HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998-1422.Felora.99-05-04EMPLOY& DE LA CCURONNE
DE L’ONTARK)
COMMISSION DE
RkGLEMENT
DES GRIEFS
180 DUNDAS STREi7 WEST; SUITE 800, TORONTO ON M5G IZ8 TELEPHONElTiLiPHONE : (416) 326-1388
160, RUE DUNDAS OUES 7; BUREAU 600, TORONTO (Ot$ M5G lZ8 FACSIMILE/l-itiCOPIE : (416)326-1396
GSB #1422/98, 1428198, 1429198, 1430198, 143 l/98, 1432198, 1433198, 1432198
OLB #188/98, 189198, 203-205/98, 210/98, 226198, 283/98
IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION
Under
THE CROWN EMPLOYEES COLLECTIVE BARGAINING ACT
Before
THE GRIEVANCE SETTLEMENT iOARD
BETWEEN
Ontario Liquor Boards Employees’ Union
(Felora et al)
- and -
The Crown in Right of Ontario
(Liquor Control Board of Ontario)
BEFORE Bram Herlich Vice-Chair
FOR THE
GRIEVORS
Julia Noble
Legal Counsel
Ontario Liquor Board Employees Union
FOR THE
EMPLOYER
Alison Renton
Counsel, Legal Services
Liquor Control Board of Ontario
HEARING April 29, 1999
Grievors
Employer
AWARD
The.hearing in these matters, which are all grievances arising out of job competition
CR#14/98, convened on April 29, 1999. At that time employer counsel filed copies of
written notices of hearing which had been sent to each of the 12 incumbents potentially
affected by these proceedings. Four of those incumbents, Ms. Elizabeth Pszenny and
Messrs. Robert Saliba, Arnold Au, and Tom Kolokotronis, were in attendance at the
hearing. ,
Prior to the commencement of the hearing, counsel for the parties each met
separately with the incumbents to explain to them the nature of the proceedings and to
answer any questions they might have had. When the hearing commenced, I explained to
the incumbents that they were entitled to fully participate in the proceedings should they
so choose and that they were free to seek whatever independent advice they might see fit.
However, the parties advised that the only matters to be dealt with on the initial hearing
day related to settin, 0 further hearing dates and dealing with an uncontentious matter
regarding the production of certain documents. The calling of any further evidence will
therefore await the next scheduled hearing date. Thus, as a practical matter, the
incumbents (both those in and not in attendance at the hearing) will have the benefit of
some time to reflect on and consider the precise form of their future participation.
-2-
documents The .union has requested an order that the employer produce the relevant
from the personnel files of each of the incumbents who were successful
competition. The employer has not objected to this request. It is so ordered.
in the job
The Board notes that the union has provided its undertaking to hold any such
information disclosed by this order in the strictest confidence, to use it only for the 7
l&poses of this case, and to return or destroy all such documents at the conclusion of
these proceedings.
Hearing in these matters will continue on dates to-be set in consultation with the
parties. Employer counsel will advise the incumbents of the next scheduled hearing
dates.
Dated this 4’h day of May, 1999 at Toronto, Ontario.
\$
Bram Herlich
Vice-Chair