HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-1928.Policy Grievance.04-03-29 DecisionCrown Employees
Grievance Settlement
Board
Suite 600
180 Dundas St. West
Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z8
Tel. (416) 326-1388
Fax (416) 326-1396
Commission de
règlement des griefs
des employés de la
Couronne
Bureau 600
180, rue Dundas Ouest
Toronto (Ontario) M5G 1Z8
Tél. : (416) 326-1388
Téléc. : (416) 326-1396
GSB#2002-1928
IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION
Under
THE CROWN EMPLOYEES COLLECTIVE BARGAINING ACT
Before
THE GRIEVANCE SETTLEMENT BOARD
BETWEEN
Association of Management Administrative
and Professional Crown Employees of Ontario
(Policy Grievance) Grievor
- and -
The Crown in Right of Ontario
(Management Board Secretariat) Employer
BEFORE Richard Brown Vice-Chair
FOR THE UNION Michael Mitchell
Sack Goldblatt Mitchell
Barristers and Solicitors
FOR THE EMPLOYER David Strang and Mary-Pat Moore
Counsel
Management Board Secretariat
HEARING March 29, 2004.
2
Decision
Pursuant to an order of this board dated December 19, 2003, the employer provided to the union
information about people engaged by the Ministry of Health who are not formally classified as
public servants. Included in this package was a brief description of the work performed. In a
document provided to the employer on March 24, 2004, the association used the designations
“y”, “x” and “?” to designate respectively persons claimed as members of its bargaining unit,
persons not so claimed and person about whom additional information was required. In most
cases, such information relates to the nature of the work performed as indicated by the notation
“job specs.”
The association seeks a further order relating to individuals with a designation of “y” or “?” and
a notation relating to “job specs.” For these individuals, the employer is ordered to produce to the
association by April 26, 2004:
· any contract or secondment agreement for an individual, and
· if such a contract or agreement does not exist or does not describe the work performed by
an individual, a job specification or any other document containing a description of this work
Such documents need not be provided for any individual whom the employer concedes should be
treated as a member of the bargaining unit.
In the event there is no existing document describing a person’s work, the employer undertakes,
where appropriate, to prepare a fuller description than the one already provided.
3
Dated at Toronto this 29th day of March 2004.
Richard Brown
Vice-Chair