Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutStewart 93-00-00 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION between FANSHAWE COLLEGE OF APPLIED ARTS AND TECHNOLOGY (hereinafter referred to as the College) and ONTARIO PUBLIC SERVICE EMPLOYEES UNION, LOCAL 109 (hereinafter referred to as the Union) Classification Grievance of A. Stewart Sole Arbitrator: G. J. Brandt Appearances: For the College: Peter Myers, Ass't Dir, Human Res. Saskia Gingrich, Mgr. Acc/ting Services For the Union: Sandra Kippen, Chief Steward Arthur Stewart, Grievor Brenda Smith, Observer Hearing: London, Ont. January 20, 1993 2 AWARD 1. Introduction The grievor, Arthur Stewart is a Reconciliation Clerk in the Accounting Services Department of the College. He is classified as a Clerk D General, Payband 7. In this grievance he seeks to be reclassified as a Clerk Atypical, Payband 9 with retroactive pay, benefits and seniority to the date of the grievance, December 13, 1991. The parties are agreed as to the contents of the Position Description Form. However, they differ on the appropriate ratings for a number of the job factors in the Manual. The following table sets out the respective ratings assigned to the various factors by the parties. College Union 1. Job Difficulty C4 144 C5 166 2. Guidance Received D3 129 D4 150 3. Communications C3 84 D3 109 4. Knowledge (Training/Exp) D4 90 D4 90 (Skill) 3 34 3 34 5. Working Conditions Manual Effort A5 3 B4 10 Visual Strain B4 10 C4 18 Environmental A5 3 B5 13 Total Points 497 590 Pay Band 7 9 3 2. Facts The position summary reads as follows: Under general supervision of the Manager, Accounting Services, the incumbent is responsible for reconciliation of all payroll deductions. Responsible for ensuring all deductions are interpreted and set up appropriately on - line payroll system for each benefit offered (currently around 140 deductions on file). Responsible for ensuring deduction premium payments are made on a timely basis. Responsible for maintaining records of appointments for sessional, partial load and part-time faculty, and ensuring departments are advised if the appointments contravene Collective Agreement. The grievor performs his duties while seated at a desk located in a cubicle that is separated from other cubicles by six foot high partitions. His cubicle is one of 4 cubicles located in a fairly confined area. Each cubicle has a telephone, calculators, computers and printers where other members of the Accounting Services Department carry out their functions. In addition there is nearby a machine that periodically issues cheques. Virtually all of the grievor's duties (90% on his estimation) are performed while sitting at his desk. Although he is able to leave his desk on breaks or, for example, to go to a printer to print a document etc, he would not be able to complete his work if he were to absent himself from his desk for more than 10% of his time. Most of his time is spent working with names and numbers on a printed page. Each month after the payroll cycle has been 4 completed the grievor generates deduction reconciliation sheets numbering 280 pages in total. These are single spaced documents which use a type font that is smaller than the normal type font seen on the printed page. In the course of doing his duties the grievor spends ten full days a month closely examining these numbers. His cubicle is lit by an overhead fluorescent light that casts a shadow on his page. Consequently, he has been provided with a desk top lamp to light the page. Somewhat in excess of 50% of the grievor's duties involve him in reconciling the deductions from payroll of all employees of the College, full time and on contract, with the remittance of the monies so deducted to those to whom it is to be directed. Thus, 35% of his time is spent reconciling Sun Life and CIGNA benefit premiums and remittances to the carrier. A similar kind of function is performed with respect to tax, UIC, CPP and pension deductions (8%); union dues (5%); and CSBs, Parking, ASA, Blue Cross and United Way deductions (5%) Although the precise way in which this is done varies with the particular deduction the essential process is one in which the grievor initially seeks to verify that the total amount deducted corresponds to the amount paid out to insurance carriers, the union, Receiver General etc. Where, as is usually the case, those numbers do not balance, he examines more closely the deduction reconciliation sheets looking for possible explanations for the 5 discrepancy. In some instances there may have been new employees added or other employees deleted since the previous month's reconciliation; or there many have been some change in salary that triggers a different deduction. Or errors could arise as a result of incorrect data entry by payroll clerks or through computer malfunction. When the explanation for the discrepancy is discovered the grievor goes into the system and, by computer, either sets up an arrears or a reimbursement for the employee to be reflected in the next month's direct deposit of salary to the employee's bank account. However, in order to avoid confusion and conflict when monthly bank statements are sent to employees the grievor notifies them in advance of what he has done. He testified that he frequently encounters opposition from other employees who either want a credit paid out immediately in the form of a cheque or who resist the notion that their next succeeding pay will be reduced by a greater amount sufficient to recover the loss suffered as a result of the error. The other portion of this aspect of the grievor's duties require him to determine the amount of money that is to be remitted to eg, the insurance carrier, to prepare the necessary remittance forms and to ensure that the remittances are made by the due date. Where that date is missed the College can incur a substantial penalty. A significant proportion (25%) of the grievor's time is spent on slightly different, through related, duties. Faculty who are under contract with the College could be part time employees, sessional employees, or on partial load. Under the collective agreement different salaries and benefits trigger once these employees reach certain service levels. Consequently, the grievor is required to monitor their months of service and to advise Department or Division heads when the status of an employee is about to change in order that the appropriate salary or benefits can be paid in the next pay period. Or, the grievor may be expected to monitor progress for the purpose of alerting Department or Division Heads to the fact that an employee is getting close to the trigger point and so permit them to avoid such increases by reducing the number of hours to be assigned in future pay periods. There is very little close review of the grievor's work by his supervisor. Ms. Saskia Gingrich. There is no review at all of the monitoring of the months of service of sessional or partial load faculty. The grievor deals entirely with the Department or Division heads on those matters. As for the deduction reconciliation duties Ms. Gingrich ensures that the payments to insurance carriers, Receiver General, union, etc. are within the prescribed deadlines. Further, she looks at the "reasonability" of the dollar amounts on the cheques. However, she does no specific review of his work. The only other kind of review that is done is 7 a year end analysis and reconciliation of liability accounts. 3. Analysis Initially it must be determined whether or not this is an appropriate case for the application of Core Point Rating. The Manual indicates that Core Point Rating is reserved for cases which are atypical and that an effort should be made initially to classify the position according to the Classification Guidelines. The grievor is classified as a Clerk General D. The Typical Duties for that classification as set out in the Guidelines are as follows: 1 Determines student financial assistance and eligibility 2 Verifies the completeness and accuracy of produced payroll. 3 Analyzes statements to determine causes of budget variance 4 Conducts cost analysis studies 5 Processes and controls purchase orders Organizes systems, procedures and paper flow 7 Analyzes problems relating to clerical systems and procedures and recommends revisions. 8. Organizes the clerical activities of activities such as convocation, open house, orientation, etc. In my opinion this list of typical duties does not accurately reflect the duties performed by the grievor. First, a number of the duties there listed, (viz, numbers 1,4,5,7) do not (according to the evidence) appear to be done by him at all. However, secondly (and more importantly) important parts of the grievor's duties are not referred to or suggested at all by these duties. I refer to the contact with staff to avoid conflict and confusion 8 over future adjustments to bank deposits, the calculation and processing of remittance payments to recipients by an established deadline, and the monitoring of service of sessional and partial load faculty. Each of these functions requires a level of accountability and sensitivity which is not reflected in the list of duties set out in the Classification Guidelines. Accordingly, I would find the grievor's position to be one which is atypical thereby warranting an application of the Core Point Rating Plan. I proceed to a consideration of the factors in dispute in the Core Point Rating Plan. 1. Job Difficulty (Judgment) In my opinion the level of judgment required for this position should be set at level 5. It is to be noted that this requirement will be met if problem solving involves either the interpretation of complex data or the refining of work methods and techniques. I am satisfied that the nature of the position is such that the grievor is frequently required to refine his methods and techniques. I am impressed with the significant variety in the situations that confront the grievor. The data that he works with involves faculty and staff whose status varies considerably (full time, part time, sessional.) Deductions from payroll are made for a large number of purposes not all of which are the same for each employee 9 or group of employees. Benefit carriers may decide to offer a premium free holiday to employees, some of whom may qualify and some of whom may not. Further, the employee absence system according to which an earnings line is set up for people on various kinds of absence (eg. Long Term Disability, Post Retirement, Leave of Absence,etc.) contributes to a situation in which it is difficult to speak of any conventional way of approaching a particular problem. I find it difficult to accept in these circumstances that the problem solving that the grievor is engaged in involves a "variety of conventional problems with "established analytical techniques". In my opinion the problems are neither "conventional" nor the methods of solution "established". Accordingly, I would rate this factor at level 5. 2. Guidance Received (Nature of Review) There can be little dispute that the grievor's work is only subject to a "general form of review for achievement of specific objectives and adherence to established deadlines." A significant portion of his work (the monitoring of service of sessional and partial load employees) is not reviewed at all by Ms. Gingrich. The deduction reconciliation work is reviewed for adherence to the payment deadlines and only in terms of whether the figure that he has calculated is "reasonable". The year end analysis is, at most, 10 a very general form of review. Accordingly, I would rate this factor at level 4. 3. Communications (Purpose of Contacts) Although I accept that the grievor, in his dealings with faculty over questions of adjustment to their pay, may require a measure of tact, diplomacy and persuasion, I do not believe that, on balance, the union's claim that the purpose of contacts should be rated at level D should be accepted. I note first the Manual requirement that only those contacts which occupy a significant part of the job and are a regular and integral part of the job should be considered. While I accept that there may be a number of errors that appear in the deduction reconciliation statements I am sceptical of the claim that the task of persuading employees to accept change in their next salary deposit is of such a magnitude as to meet this threshold. Moreover, as an interpretive matter, level D requires that the contacts be "for the purpose of problem identification and solution" with respect to certain matters. The grievor does not have contacts with staff for this purpose. He identifies the problem and the probable solution to that problem through his analysis of the deduction reconciliation statements. His purpose 11 in contacting staff is not generally to aid him in identifying or solving the problem but rather to tell them what he intends to do about it. In my view that function is better captured by the standards set down in level C, viz "explaining various matters by interpreting procedures or policy". Accordingly, I would rate this factor at level C. 4. Working Conditions (Manual Effort) The evidence is undisputed that the griever is required to sit at his desk for approximately 90% of his time in order to complete his duties. I do not believe that the fact that he is permitted to leave his desk on occasion converts what is in reality "prolonged" sitting into "intermittent sitting", particularly where as a practical matter he would be unable to do his job if he were to leave his desk for any significant period of time. Accordingly I would rate this factor at B4. 5. Visual Strain On the evidence there is no serious dispute that the griever is required to concentrate on small objects for periods of up to 2 hours at a time. 12 Consequently, the Visual Strain factor should be rated at level C. 6. Work Environment. The evidence is clear that the environment in which the grievor work is "somewhat noisy" He is in close proximity to a number of machines and to other employees and to a cheque producing machine. Although the guidelines suggest that an office environment should generally be rated at level A I am of the view that exceptions can and should be made from that general rule. In this case I am satisfied that an exception should be made. First, it appears that the design of the office is such that the grievor is in very close proximity to a number of other noise producing sources, either human or mechanical. The cubicles are small and close to one another and the occupant and equipment in each cubicle is capable of producing considerable noise. Secondly, the nature of the work that the incumbent is required to do is of some significance. In this case I am persuaded that, given the need to concentrate closely on the deduction reconciliation sheets and the need to search for discrepancies and their possible solutions, the position occupied by the grievor is one in which the noise in the environment is perhaps more distracting than it may be in an area where, for example, an employee is doing relatively routine work that requires less concentration. 13 Accordingly, I rate this factor at level B. 4. Summary The following table summarizes my evaluation of the factors in dispute. 1. Job Difficulty C5 166 2. Guidance Received D4 150 3. Communications C3 84 4. Knowledge (Training/Exp) D4 90 (Skill) 3 34 5. Working Conditions Manual Effort B4 10 Visual Strain C4 18 Environmental B5 13 Total Points 565 Pay Band 8 Consequently, the grievance is allowed, in part, and the College is directed to reclassify the grievor as a Clerk Atypical Payband 8 and to compensate him for his losses flowing from incorrect classification. I do not, however, consider this to be an appropriate case for the award of interest. I remain seised of jurisdiction to deal with any issues that may arise out of the calculation of the compensation to which the grievor is entitled. Dated at LONDON, Ont. this day of , 1993 14 G. J. Brandt, Arbitrator