HomeMy WebLinkAboutDunstan 93-10-05 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION
BETWEEN:
GEORGE BROWN COLLEGE
- and-
ONTARIO PUBLIC SERVICE EMPLOYEES UNION
CLASSIFICATION GRIEVANCE OF P. DUNSTAN
ROARD OF ARRTTRATION:
JANE H. DEVLIN CHAIRMAN
DAVID W. GUPTILL COLLEGE NOMINEE
SHERRIL MURRAY UNION NOMINEE
Jane Smale, for the College
Pamela A. Chapman, for the Union
OPS~U FII.R NO.: 92F854
HEARING DATE: September 29, 1993
The Grievor, Paul Dunstan, is classified as a General
Maintenance Worker at payband 7 and seeks reclassification to
payband 8.
The factors in dispute are as follows:
Factors College Rating Union Rating
Job Difficulty C3 D3
Communications B2 C3
Working Conditions:
Manual Effort D3 D4
Visual Strain C3 C5
Work Environment C5 D5
The Grievor works at the St. James campus where he
assists Skilled Trades Workers in a wide variety of tasks
including the maintenance of machinery such as motors and fans,
changing filters, installing couplings om gas equipment, minor
plumbing and furniture repairs and painting. Although the
Grievor works primarily with the mechanic, the electrician and
the plumber, from time to time, he also assists the painter and
the carpenter. As well, the Grievor performs certain duties
independently, including lighting maintenance which involves
replacing fluorescent tubes, mercury vapour lamps, holders and
2
ballasts. The Grievor also works on switches when the
electrician is in close proximity. As well, he prepares purchase
recommendations for materials which he provides to the Lead Hand.
On occasion, he also contacts suppliers directly with regard to
the availability of lighting although he is not involved in
ordering lighting or other materials.
The Grievor's work assignments are allocated to him by
the Lead hand and, when necessary, direction is provided by the
~appropriate Skilled Trades Worker. The Grievor also has contact
with College staff, for the purpose of gaining access to various
work locations and in the event of any difficulty, he contacts
the Campus Manager. As well, he may assist contractors working
at the College to locate particular items they require and on an
infrequent basis, he demonstrates his work to students.
The Grievor uses various tools in carrying out his
duties, including saws which are located in the shop as well as a
hammer drill and a number of hand tools. Although he has a cart
to transport materials, he explained that he generally carries
light bulbs and ladders by hand as only a 7 foot ladder can be
carried on the cart. In the course of work, he also assists
Skilled Trades Workers in moving items such as blackboards,
furniture, motors and heavy sinks.
3
The Grievor performs the bulk of his work indoors
although twice each year, he works on the roof in connection with
the heating and air conditioning systems. On occasion, he may
also work on the roof when assisting to repair a motor. As well,
he works in the freezer or refrigeration areas where he assists
the mechanic and he works in the plant room when assisting with
motors repairs and maintenance. He also works in ventilation
shafts where he is involved in changing filters and when
assisting the plumber, he may be required to work in crawl spaces
where the lighting is poor.
The Grievor estimated that at least 2 to 3 times each
week, he works on a ladder and, for the most part, he uses an 8
foot ladder. Occasionally, however, he uses a 10 to 12 foot
ladder to change lighting in the weight room. He also uses an
extension ladder when changing outdoor lighting and lighting in
the stairwell. Occasionally, he uses scaffolding when working on
gymnasium lighting or repairing chimney screens.
When assisting the various Skilled Trades Workers, the
Grievor is exposed to fumes from products such as paint, varsol,
glycol, drain cleaner and contact cement. He is also exposed to
dust when changing filters and when performing this work as well
as when painting in enclosed areas, he wears a respirator. He
also wears other protective equipment such as glasses, safety
4
shoes and gloves and when changing lighting in the gymnasium, he
wears a safety harness.
It is necessary, then, to consider the factors in
dispute.
1 Job Difficulty
The parties agree that in respect of the element of
judgement, the Grievor's job is properly rated at level 3 but
they disagree as to the rating for the element of complexity.
As indicated previously, the' Grievor performs some of
his work independently and also assists Skilled Trades Workers.
In the Board's view, much of the work which the Grievor performs
independently, particularly in relation' to lighting maintenance,
is routine in nature and given that this accounts for a
significant portion of his time, we find that his position is
properly rated at level C in that his work involves various
complex tasks that include both routine and non-routine aspects
requiring different and unrelated processes and methods.
5
2. Communications:
Dealing firstly with the element of purpose of
contacts, the Board finds that, for the most part, the Grievor is
not involved in providing guidance, instruction or technical
advice, nor is he involved in interpreting policies or procedures
which is characteristic of a rating at level C. In the result,
the Board is not prepared to alter the present rating at level B.
As to level of contacts, while the Grievor has some
contact with employees at higher levels within the College, it
would appear that his main contacts are with the Skilled Trades
Workers whom he assists. Moreover, there is no indication that
the Grievor has contact with employees at middle management
levels outside the College and, accordingly, his position is
appropriately rated at level 2.
3. Working Conditions
In the element of manual effort~ both parties agree
that the Grievor's job is properly rated at level D in that work
requires heavy manual effort and physical exertion although they
disagree as to the prevalence or extent to which such effort is
required.
6
Having considered the evidence carefully, it is the
Board's view that the Grievor is occasionally required to exert
heavy manual effort and that he is not involved in extensive
climbing, using heavy tools or machinery or lifting heavy
materials to a sufficient extent to justify a rating at level 4.
In the result, the rating in this element shall remain at level
D3.
As to visual strain, both parties agree that
considerable visual concentration is required but, again, they
disagree on the prevalence of the degree of visual strain.
Taking into account the strain caused when performing duties
relating to lighting maintenance as well as the requirement to
focus on small objects when performing repairs and the necessity
to work, from time to time, in poorly lit areas, the Board finds
that the Grievor's position is properly rated at level C4.
Finally, in the element of work environment, the
Board agrees with the Union that the Grievor is exposed to very
disagreeable working conditions to a sufficient extent to warrant
a rating at level D. Moreover, taking into account the
cumulative effect of his exposure to extreme cold and fumes, the
requirement to work from heights with the attendant risk of
~n3ury together with his use of protective equipment, the Board
finds that in this element, the Grievor's position is
appropriately rated at level D3.
In summary, in respect of the factors in dispute, the
Board finds that the Grievor's position is properly rated as
follows:
Job Difficulty C3
Communications B2
Working Conditions:
Manual Effort D3
Visual Strain C4
Work Environment D3
Based upon these ratings, the total points for the
position increase from 456 to 462. As this does not result in a
change in payband, the grievance of Mr. Dunstan is hereby
dismissed.
DATED AT TORONTO, this 5th day of October, 1993.
Chairman
"David W. Guptill"
College Nominee
"Sherri! Murray"
Union Nominee