HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988-1129.Malyon.89-07-17 ONTARIO EMPLOY~'S DE LA COURONNE
CROWN EMPLOYEES DE L 'ONTARIO
GRIEVANCE C,OMMISSlON DE
SETFLEMENT REGLEMENT
BOARD DES GRIEFS
180 DUNDAS STREET WEST, TORONTO, ONTARIO. MSG 1Z$- SUITE2100 TELEPHONE/T~L~'PHONE
180. RUE OUNDAS OUEST, TORONTO. (ONTARIO) M5G 1Z8 - BUREAU 2100 (41~) 598-0688
1129/88
IN THE FATTER OF AN ARBITRATION
Under
THE CROWN EMPnOYEES COLLECTIVE BARGAINING ACT
Before
THE GRIEVANCE SETTLE~tENT BOARD
Be tween:
OPSEU (Malyon)
Grievor
- and-
The Crown in Right of Ontario
(Ministry of Revenue)
Employer
Before:
R.J. Roberts - Vice-Chairperson
T. Browe s-Bugden - Member
W. Lobraico - Member
APPEARING FOR M. Bevan
THE GRIEVOR: Grievance Officer
Ontario Public Service Employees Union
APPEARING FOR D. Daniels
THE EMPLOYER: Staff Relations Officer
Personnel Services Branch
Ministry of Revenue
HEARING: February 3, 1989
March 16, 1989
AWARD
In the present arbitration the Union submitted on behalf 6f
the Grievor that she was unreasonably denied compassionate leave
under the following provision of the Collective Agreement.
ARTICLE 55 - SPECIAL AND COMPASSIONATE LEAVE
55.1 A Deputy Minister or his designee may Grant an
employee leave-of-absence with pay for not more
than three (3) days in a year upon special or
compassionate grounds.
For reasons which follow, the grievance is allowed.
The grievor is a Property Assessor employed by the Ministry
of Revenue in its offices in Cornwall, Ontario. At about 8:00
a.m. on September 21, 1988, the Grievor went to her supervisor
and requested compassionate leave for that day. She filled out
the appropriate form and stated as the reason for her request, "I
need the day to be coach for my sister while she has her baby".
The supervisor took this request to the Assessment Commissioner,
Mr. Gagnon. The two of them briefly discussed it. Mr. Gagnon
then requested that the grievor come in to Give him additional
details. The gr'ievor, however, had already left. She received
permission to leave from her supervisor at the time she filled
out the form.
When he ~as advised that the grievor was no longer in the
building, Mr. GaGnon sought further information from Ms. Connie
Gaucher, the Manager, Budget and Office Services. He asked Ms.
Gaucher if she knew anything about the gr~ievor's sister. Ms.
Gaucher replied that she ,knew that the sister was a registered
nurse and a single mother in her mid-30's. Thereafter, Mr.
Gagnon returned to his office and at about noon on that same daY,
he denied the grievor's request for compassionate leave.
At the hearing, the grievor testified that throughout the
course of her sister's pregnancy, her sister was quite alone.
The father of the child had disassociated himself as soon as he
found out that her sister was pregnant. The mother and father of
the grievor and her sister were advanced in years and unable to
assist during the birth. The ~rievor was the only one to whom
her sister could turn for support during labour and delivery of
the baby. Mr. Gagnon candidly agreed in his testimony that none
of these additional facts was known to him at the time he made
his decision to deny compassionate leave.
Under Article 55.1 of the Collective Agreement, the Ministry
has the discretionary authority to grant paid compassionate leave
to an employee for up to 3 days per year. This discretion is not
unlimited. It must be exercised reasonably. Re O'Brien and
Ministry of Correctional Services (1987)r G.$.B. #1157/86
(Gandz); Re Stace¥ and Ministry of Correction Services (1987),
G.S.B. #0193/85 (Roberts). This requirement of reasonableness
demands that the decision-making process conform to certain
3
minimum standards. In Re Kuyntjes and Ministry of TransDortation
and Communications (1984), G.$.B. #513/84 (Verity), these minimum
standards were set forth as follows:
1) The decision must be made in good faith and
without discrimination.
2) It must be a genuine exercise of discretionary
power, as opposed to rigid policy adherence.
3) Consideration must be given to the merits of the
individual application under review.
4) All relevant facts must be considered and
conversely irrelevant consideration must be
re~ected. Id. at p. 16.
In the present case, there seems to be no doubt that Mr. Gagnon's
decision was made in good faith and constituted a genuine
exercise of discretionary power with respect to the individual
application of the grievor; however, it appears that Mr. Gagnon
failed to consider all relevant facts before he reached his
decision.
When he made his decision, Mr. Gagnon did not have any facts
before him relating to the genuiness of the need of the grievor's
sister for the grievor's aid and comfort during the course of
labour and delivery. For all that Mr. Gagnon knew, the father or
other family members were there at the hospital to render this
kind of assistance. This, of course, was not the case.
4
We do not doubt that what motivated the grievor to seek
leave on the day in question was her sister's special need for
her help during labour and childbirth. There was some argument
advanced by the Ministry' that it was not "necessary" in the
physical sense for the grievor to be with her sister because the
sister'was a registered nurse and, to her knowledge, the hospital
staff were competent to handle any complications which might
arise in the course of labour and delivery. But Article 55.1
does not confine the exercise of discretion to such "bloodless"
criteria. Considering the grievor's testimony in light of the
surrounding circumstances, we accept that there was a moral and
emotional necessity for her to be with her sister on that day.
She was in a "situation deserving of a sympathetic treatment."
Re Elesie and Ministry of Health (1980), G.S.B. ~24/79, at p. 7
.(Swinton). This is what compassionate leave is all about.
Accordingly, the grievance is allowed. It is ordered that
the records of the grievor be corrected to indicate that on
September 21, 1988, the grievor was on compassionate leave, and
it is further ordered that the vacation day which the grievor was
required to take to cover this absence be reinstated to her.
DATED at London, Ontario, this 17th day of July,
1989.