Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014-3642.Cayer et al.16-06-29 DecisionCrown Employees Grievance Settlement Board Suite 600 180 Dundas St. West Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z8 Tel. (416) 326-1388 Fax (416) 326-1396 Commission de règlement des griefs des employés de la Couronne Bureau 600 180, rue Dundas Ouest Toronto (Ontario) M5G 1Z8 Tél. : (416) 326-1388 Téléc. : (416) 326-1396 GSB#2014-3642 UNION#2014-0411-0029 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION Under THE CROWN EMPLOYEES COLLECTIVE BARGAINING ACT Before THE GRIEVANCE SETTLEMENT BOARD BETWEEN Ontario Public Service Employees Union (Cayer et al) Union - and - The Crown in Right of Ontario (Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services) Employer BEFORE Felicity D. Briggs Vice-Chair FOR THE UNION Dan Sidsworth Ontario Public Service Employees Union Grievance Officer FOR THE EMPLOYER Brian Scott Treasury Board Secretariat Centre for Employee Relations Employee Relations Advisor HEARING June 14, 2016 - 2 - Decision [1] The Employer and the Union at the Ottawa Carleton Detention Centre agreed to participate in the Expedited Mediation-Arbitration process in accordance with the negotiated Protocol. A number of the grievances were settled through that process. However, this grievance remained unresolved requiring a decision from this Board. The Protocol provides that decisions will be issued within a relatively short period of time after the actual mediation sessions and will be without reasons. Further, the decision is to be without prejudice and precedent. [2] Mr. Michel Cayer filed a group grievance on his own behalf and for other MM2 employees working in the maintenance department at OCDC. The grievance contended “that we have been performing MM3 work since 2008 as per the job description. We believe that we should be getting paid as MM3s”. [3] The Union raised a number of duties and responsibilities that the grievors relied upon in defence of the grievance. The Employer contended that this Board is without jurisdiction to hear and determine this matter because classification grievances are inarbitrable. [4] I must agree with the Employer. I am without the jurisdiction to adjudicate this matter. The grievance must be dismissed. Dated at Toronto, Ontario this 29th day of June 2016. Felicity D. Briggs, Vice Chair