HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-1530.Fournier.94-05-05
- __~_M__.
,r -~._.-
"' ,.. ,':i' or:; ( (,
, l.' .
, ONTARIO EMPLOYES DE LA COURONNE
.. i~~' -." CROWN EMPLOYEES DE L'ONTAR/O
~IIII' 'GRIEVANCE cpMMISSION DE
SETTLEMENT REGLEMENT
BOARD DES GRIEFS
180 DUNDAS STREET WEST SUITE 2100, TORONTO, ONTARIO. MSG lZ8 TELEPHONE/TELEPHONE (476) 326-1388
180, RUE DUNDAS OUEST BUREAU 2100, TORONTO (ONTARIO) MSG lZ8 FACSIMILE /TELECOPIE (416) 326-1396
.1530/93
IN THE HATTER OF AN ARBITRATION
Under
THE CROWN EMPLOYEES COLLECTIVE BARGAINING ACT
Before
T~E GRIEVANCE SETTLEMENT BOARD
)
BETWEEN ,~
OPSEU (Fournier)
- Grievor
- and -
The Crown in Right of Ontario
(Ministry of Transportation)
Employer
BEFORE: W Kapl~n Vice-Chairperson
P. KlYm Member
F Collict Member
FOR THE N. Roland
GRIEVOR Barristers & Solicitors
FOR THE P. Thorup
EMPLOYER Counsel
Filion, Wakely & Thorup
Barristers & Solicitors
HEARING April 8, 1994
\
j
( (' .- ---.....-...-
,. 2 \..
€' - ~
Introduction
" By two grievances dated May 18, 1993, Karen Fournier, a Sign Painter
Improver employed by the Ministry of Transportation, grieves that she has
been discriminated against and harassed in the workplace These two
grievances proceeded to a heanng in Toronto at which time a number of
preliminary issues were raised For the convenience of the' parties, and at
their request, the following sets out in writing the Board's disposition of
the preliminary issues in dispute
1 The parties are directed to disclose to each other, in advance of the next
scheduled hearing date, all relevant documents. It is understood that
certain documents relating to the attempted settlement of the gnevor's
human rights complaint are not subject to this order It is also understood
that the use of these documents by either of the parties during either the
pre-hearing process, or during the hearing itself, is by order of the Board
----
2 The union is directed to provide the employer with particulars
underlying both of the grievances
3 The employer is directed to respond to these particulars by Indicating
./
acceptance, disagreement or any alternate facts or explanation It is
(
understood that the employer's response will be based on information
obtained from members of management.
4 The union and the employer are directed to provide the members of the
Board with copies of these particulars in advance of the next scheduled
date
I
( ( .-
3
!fo -,......~
5 The employer is directed to advise the follOWing persons of these
I
proceedings and of the fact that they may have the nght to participate in
these proceedings either alone or represented by counsel
Frank Babiak
Rod Bishop
Wayne Johnson
Robert Lisenchuk
Scott McCallum
The employer is further directed to provide each of these persons with a
I
copy of this award
j
6 The Board directs that witnesses be excluded from this hearing
7 The hearing will reconvene in Thunder Bay on November 3, 1 994
DATED at Toronto this 5th day of May, 1994
/// '- ----
----------------
William Kaplan
Vice-Chairperson
11t
-4- --- -------
P Klym
Member
~~J ..J
F-Col -------
Member
\