HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-1530.Fournier.94-11-25
. ~~
.1'\ --":Z'
~ \..~
ONTARIO EMPLOYES DE LA COURONNE
CROWN EMPLOYEES DE L'ONTARIO
1111 GRIEVANCE cpMMISSION DE
SETTLEMENT REGLEMENT
BOARD PES GRIEFS -
180 DUNDAS STREET WEST SUITE 2100, TORONTO. ONTARIO, MSG lZ8 TELEPHONE/TELEPHONE (476) 326-1388
180, RUE DUNDAS OUEST BUREAU 2100 TORONTO (ONTARIO) M5G lZ8 FACSIMILE ITELECOPIE (416) 326-1396
1530/93
IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION
-
Under
THE CROWN EMPLOYEES COLLECTIVE BARGAINING ACT
Before
~
THE GRIEVANCE SETTLEMENT BOARD
BETWEEN
OPSEU (Fournier) I
-',1.' Grievor
.:~" - and -
I
I
The Crown in. Right\ of Ontario I
I
(Ministry of Transportation) I
,Employer
BEFORE: W. Kaplan Vice-Chairperson
P. KlYm Member
F. Collict Member
FOR THE N. Roland )
GRIEVOR Counsel
Barristers & Solicitors
t
\
FOR THE P Thorup
EMPLOYER Counsel
Filion Wakely & Thorup
Barristers & Solicitors
HEARING April 8, 1994
November 3, 1994
"
.
~'..'
"i_
'"
'"
2
Introduction J (
This matter was scheduled to proceed to a hearing on November 17 & 18,
"
1994 In advance of these sc;:hedul~d hearing dates, the Board was advised
)
that it would not- be possible to begin the calling of evidence on either of
these dates as a result of delays in the exchange of particulars The Board
was, however, advised that it would be possible to deal with some
preliminary matters, and that it was not expected that the consideration of
these matters would take more than an hour or two After considering this
\ .
information the Board decided, given the cost of travelling to Thunder Bay,
to adjourn these scheduled hearings as the next scheduled hearing days
were only several weeks away and it made little sense, in a time of
economic restraint, for the Board to travel to Thunder Bay to deal with
matters that could be readily dealt with on the next scheduled date
I
A number of other factors were also taken into account. The Board formed
the view that some of the outstanding preliminary matters in dispute could
not be dealt with until the particulars had been exchanged.. Furthermore,
cancelling these hearing dates would not only save money but would also
make the panel available for previously scheduled GSB cases The parties
\
were advised of these deliberations and our decision and, at their request,
thi~ written order is issued
(
.
..
/'~. ~
.-,
~,
3
DATED at Toronto this 25th day of November, 1994
1/'./ v---.----
----------------
William Kaplan
Vice-Chairperson
--1 - - ,
t'1{V;~ \
-----------------
P Klym
Member
__~~i1_.
F Colli
Member
I
j
(
!
-
/
)