Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014-4095 MacVicar.17-06-09 Decision Crown Employees Grievance Settlement Board Suite 600 180 Dundas St. West Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z8 Tel. (416) 326-1388 Fax (416) 326-1396 Commission de règlement des griefs des employés de la Couronne Bureau 600 180, rue Dundas Ouest Toronto (Ontario) M5G 1Z8 Tél. : (416) 326-1388 Téléc. : (416) 326-1396 GSB#2014-4095, 2014-4096 UNION#2014-0499-0134, 2014-0499-0135 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION Under THE CROWN EMPLOYEES COLLECTIVE BARGAINING ACT Before THE GRIEVANCE SETTLEMENT BOARD BETWEEN Ontario Public Service Employees Union (MacVicar) Union - and - The Crown in Right of Ontario (Liquor Control Board of Ontario) Employer BEFORE Janice Johnston Vice-Chair FOR THE UNION Brodie MacRae Ontario Public Service Employees Union Grievance Officer FOR THE EMPLOYER Erin Charbonneau Liquor Control Board of Ontario HR Manager HEARING June 8, 2017 - 2 - Decision [1] The Employer and the Union agreed to participate in the expedited Mediation- Arbitration process in accordance with the Memorandum of Agreement found in Appendix 2 to the collective agreement. The majority of the grievances are normally settled pursuant to that process. However, where a mediated agreement is not attainable and the grievance remains unresolved, the parties have agreed that the Vice- Chair will determine the matter without formal proceedings. The process provides that the Vice-Chair shall issue a decision which shall be applicable only to the case heard, shall be without prejudice, shall not be used as a precedent for future cases and is not appealable. Any decision rendered must be issued within two weeks of the date of the hearing and shall provide only brief reasons, if any. [2] On June 8, 2017, the parties at Ottawa Retail Service Centre agreed to participate in the expedited Mediation-Arbitration process in accordance with the Memorandum of Agreement found in Appendix 2 to the collective agreement. The grievances that are the subject of this decision were ones that the parties agreed to deal with. [3] The grievances before me deal with two letters of reprimand issued to the grievor. [4] The first is dated May 23, 2014. Pursuant to Article 27.2 of the collective agreement as this letter is more than three years old it may no longer be used in a subsequent disciplinary proceeding. Accordingly, the employer is directed to remove it from the grievor’s file. [5] The second letter of reprimand is dated December 5, 2014. Given the length of time that has passed since it was issued, I direct the employer to convert the letter of reprimand to a letter of counsel dated the same date. - 3 - [6] Therefore, Grievance Number 2014-0499-0134 is upheld in part and Grievance Number 2014-0499-0135 is dismissed. Dated at Toronto, Ontario this 9th day of June 2017. Janice Johnston, Vice-Chair