Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998-0518.Huff.02-02-06 Decision ~~~ o@~o EA1PLOYES DE LA COURONNE _Wi iii~~~i~T DE L 'ONTARIO COMMISSION DE REGLEMENT "IIIl__1I'" BOARD DES GRIEFS Ontario 180 DUNDAS STREET WEST SUITE 600 TORONTO ON M5G 128 TELEPHONElTELEPHONE. (416) 326-1388 180 RUE DUNDAS OUEST BUREAU 600 TORONTO (ON) M5G 128 FACSIMILE/TELECOPIE. (416) 326-1396 GSB#0518/98 UNION#98B332 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION Under THE CROWN EMPLOYEES COLLECTIVE BARGAINING ACT Before THE GRIEVANCE SETTLEMENT BOARD BETWEEN Ontano PublIc ServIce Employees Umon (Huff) Grievor -and- The Crown in Right of Ontario (Ministry of Finance) Employer BEFORE Daniel Harris Vice-Chair FOR THE GRIEVOR Don Martin Grievance Officer Ontario Public Service Employees Union FOR THE EMPLOYER Fateh Salim Counsel Legal Services Branch Management Board Secretariat HEARING January 24 2002 AWARD 1 ThIS gnevance mvolves a claim that the Mimstry IS responsIble for the payment of the Gnevor's professIOnal dues to the SocIety of Management Accountants ofOntano The Employer submItted that It was not oblIged to do so by the collectIve agreement, nor was thIS sItuatIOn covered by ItS polIcy regardmg payment of such dues The Umon dId not dIsagree wIth those submIssIOns Accordmgly the gnevance IS dIsmIssed for the followmg reasons 2 The Gnevor was a Semor FIeld AudItor wIth the RetaIl Sales Tax Branch of the Mimstry ofFmance He was also a CertIfied Management Accountant (Hereafter "CMA") 3 The Employer reqUIres that applicants to the Gnevor's posItIOn hold a CMA credentIal It does so as a convemence, m order to permIt It to assess the skIlls and qualIficatIOns of applIcants for the posItIOn. However the Employer does not reqUIre successful applIcants to mamtam membershIp m the SocIety nor does It reqUIre that a successful applIcant mamtam her or hIS status as a CMA. 4 The Employer's "Travel Management and General Expenses" polIcy mcludes the followmg OTHERENWLOYEEEXPENSES Membership Fees: Payment of membership fees may be authorized when membership in an organization is beneficial to the ministry or when required, under the provisions of collective agreements. Memberships are NOT considered a taxable benefit to employees when the lninistry is the primary beneficiary of the membership This would be the case when the employee s professional membership is necessary for the effective perfonnance of his/her duties. 5 Payment of CMA professIOnal dues IS not an entItlement under the collectIve agreement. There IS also no legIslatIve reqUIrement that persons m the gnevor's posItIOn mamtam theIr certIficatIOn. The Employer said that the payment of such dues IS covered only by the polIcy set out above, whIch, on ItS face, leaves payment of membershIp fees to the Employer's dIscretIOn. 6 There IS no eVIdence that thIS case IS an arbItrary or dIscnmmatory applIcatIOn of the Employer's polIcy 7 The Umon IS m agreement WIth the foregomg submIssIOns of the Employer 2 8 As there eXIsts no dIspute between the partIes to the collectIve agreement, bemg the Umon and the Employer the Board has no JunsdIctIOn over thIS matter Accordmgly the gnevance IS hereby dIsmIssed. Dated at Toronto thIS 6th day of February 2002 '\ ,.. ''I Damel Hams, Vice-Chair 3