HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-0319.Leung et al.02-07-15 Order
~M~ om~o EA1PLOYES DE LA COURONNE
_Wi iii~~~i~T DE L "ONTARIO
COMMISSION DE
REGLEMENT
"IIIl__1I'" BOARD DES GRIEFS
Ontario
180 DUNDAS STREET WEST SUITE 600 TORONTO ON M5G 128 TELEPHONElTELEPHONE. (416) 326-1388
180 RUE DUNDAS OUEST BUREAU 600 TORONTO (ON) M5G 128 FACSIMILE/TELECOPIE. (416) 326-1396
GS8#0319/00, 0388/00, 0974/00, 1112/00, 1182/00, 1247/00, 1248/00
UNION# 008194,008206,008207,008343,008344,008345,008346,
008365, 008374, 008404, 008405
IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION
Under
THE CROWN EMPLOYEES COLLECTIVE BARGAINING ACT
Before
THE GRIEVANCE SETTLEMENT BOARD
BETWEEN
Ontario Public Service Employees Union
(Leung et ai, GUillermo/Chen)
Grievor
-and-
The Crown In Right of Ontario
(Ministry of Finance)
Employer
BEFORE Randl H Abramsky Vice-Chair
FOR THE UNION Don Martin
Grievance Officer
Ontario Public Service Employees Union
FOR THE EMPLOYER Helen Ecker
Labour Relations Consultant
Ministry of Finance
HEARING July 15, 2002
2
ORDER
Whereas the Grievance Settlement Board In Its decIsion of July 26, 2001, found
that the January, 1999, competition for seven Financial Officer 5 (AtYPical)
positions In the North York Regional Tax Office was Improperly canceled, and,
Whereas the Grievance Settlement Board In ItS decIsion of July 26,2001, stated
that the usual remedy for such a finding would be a declaration that the February
2000 competition for TA5 positions In the North York Regional Tax Office IS a
nullity, and,
Whereas the Grievance Settlement Board In ItS decIsion of July 26, 2001,
directed that the parties attempt to agree upon an acceptable remedy that IS
satisfactory and less disruptive of the Ministry's operations,
Therefore, on consent of the parties, Without precedent and Without prejudice, In
full and final resolution of all the Issues related to the canceled competition of
January, 1999, and the subsequent T A5 competition of February, 2000, the
Grievance Settlement Board orders as follows
1 The Incumbents remaining of the 10 successful candidates In the February,
2000 competition (652-99) for the Sr Corporations Tax Auditor pOSitions,
classified at the Tax Auditor 5 level, In the North York Regional Tax Office will
remain In their pOSitions, subject to the conditions set out below In paragraphs
6 and 7
2 The employer, making use of the best Information available to It will, In good
faith, select the 7 grlevors In the Chen et al and Leung et al grievances, who
are not now employed as Senior Corporations Tax Auditors, and who are, In
the employer's opinion, most qualified to fill positions as Senior Corporations
Tax Auditors, and will classify and pay those grlevors as Senior Corporations
Tax Auditors at the Tax Auditor 5 level effective July 1, 2002
3 The employer's selection of the 7 grlevors will be final and shall not be the
subject of any grievance on the merits or that Involves a comparison among
grlevors' qualifications
4 Any of those grlevors who were not selected for the Senior Corporations Tax
Auditor positions may request an Interview With the appropriate supervlsor(s)
for the purpose of gaining an understanding of any weaknesses or
defiCienCies which account for not being selected among the seven, and
which might be strengthened or corrected In order to Improve his or her
career prospects
3
5 There will be no retroactive payments to the seven grlevors associated With
their appointment to the positions of Senior Corporations Tax Auditors set out
In paragraph 2
6 Four Senior Corporations Tax Auditors from among the total of the
Incumbents from the February, 2000, competition and the selected grlevors
will be deployed to the Etoblcoke sub-office of the North York Regional Tax
Office In accordance With the procedure outlined In paragraph 7
7 The Incumbents from the February, 2000, competition and the selected
grlevors will be given the opportunity to volunteer for the Etoblcoke positions
In the event that there are more than 4 volunteers, the Employer will assign
the four most senior to Etoblcoke In the event that there are less than 4
volunteers, the employer will first assign the volunteers If any, and will assign
the least senior of the others to fill the balance of the four positions not filled
by volunteers The actual phYSical start date of those employees In the
Etoblcoke sub-office will be determined by management based on operational
considerations
8 The employer may fill the positions In the manner outlined In paragraphs 2
and 7 above Without posting the positions and the union will not grieve the
failure to post.
9 For purposes of any articles of the Collective Agreement related to
employment stability, the headquarters of the employees assigned as a result
of thiS agreement to the Etoblcoke sub-office will be the North York Regional
Tax Office
10 In the event that there IS not suffiCient work at the Tax Auditor 5 level
available In the North York Regional Tax Office as of July 1,2002, the
effective date of appointment of the grlevors selected by the employer who
are not being deployed to the Etoblcoke sub-office, those employees may be
required to perform a combination of work assigned to Corporations Tax
Auditors classified at the Tax Auditor 4 level, as well as work assigned to
Senior Corporations Tax Auditors, classified at the Tax Auditor 5 level Such
employees will remain classified and paid at the Senior Corporations Tax
Auditor, Tax Auditor 5 level
11 For the purposes of the job posting provIsions of the Collective Agreement no
vacancies will occur by the departure of Incumbents of the Senior
Corporations Tax Auditors at the Tax Auditor 5 level In the North York
Regional Tax Office until such time as the number of Senior Corporations Tax
Auditors IS equal to or less than the complement of Senior Corporations Tax
Auditors at the North York Regional Tax Office
4
12 Subsequent to the time that the complement of Senior Corporations Tax
Auditors In the North York Regional Tax Office location IS equal to or greater
than the number of Senior Corporations Tax Auditors In the North York
Regional Tax Office location, vacancies at that location will be offered In order
of seniority to employees assigned as a result of this agreement to the
Etoblcoke sub-office until such time as each such employee has either
accepted or rejected one such offer
13 Neither the fact that as a result of this agreement some Senior Corporations
Tax Auditors paid at the Tax Auditor 5 level are performing work at the
Corporations Tax Auditor, Tax Auditor 4 level, nor any of the facts concerning
the work they are dOing or the amount they are paid while working In
accordance with this agreement will be used In support of any proposal or
demand for the reclassification of any other Tax Auditors
14 The employer shall distribute, In accordance with Instructions from the union,
the sum of $156,00000, less applicable statutory deductions, to the Individual
grlevors named by the union
15 All grievances related to the February, 2000, competition for Senior
Corporations Tax Auditors In the North York Regional Tax Office are hereby
dismissed as pertaining to a Job competition which ought never to have taken
place
16 The employer will not cause any Corporations Tax Auditors classified at the
T A4 or T A5 level to be declared surplus as a result of the over complement In
the North York Regional Tax Office caused by thiS agreement.
17 Other than by the limitations expressly stated, the employer's right to manage
IS not restricted by thiS order
18 Vice-chair Randl Abramsky will remain seised with respect to any disputes
concerning the Implementation of thiS agreement.
Dated at Toronto, thiS 15th day of July, 2002
H'1hrmtE1c
Randl H Abramsky, Vice-Chair