HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001-1635.Group Grievance Corcoran et al.02-10-18 Order
~~~ o@~o EA1PLOYES DE L4 COURONNE
_Wi iii~~~i~T DE L ONTARIO
COMMISSION DE
REGLEMENT
"IIIl__1I'" BOARD DES GRIEFS
Ontario
180 DUNDAS STREET WEST SUITE 600 TORONTO ON M5G 128 TELEPHONElTELEPHONE. (416) 326-1388
180 RUE DUNDAS OUEST BUREAU 600 TORONTO (ON) M5G 128 FACSIMILE/TELECOPIE. (416) 326-1396
GSB#1635/01 1831/01 1832/01 1839/01 1840/01, 1841/01 1843/01 1844/01 1845/01 1865/01
1866/01 1867/01 1874/01 1875/01 1876/01 1877/01 1885/01, 1886/01 1887/01 1888/01 1889/01
1890/01 1891/01 1892/01 1893/01 1894/01 1895/01 1896/01, 1897/01 1898/01 1899/01 1900/01
1901/01 1902/01 1903/01 1904/01 1905/01 1906/01 1907/01, 1908/01 1909/01 1910/01 1511/02
UNION#02BI24 02B213 02B214 02B221 02B222,02B223 02B225 02B226 02B227
02B230 02B231 02B232,02B239 02B240 02B241 02B242,02B243 02B244 02B245 02B246
02B247 02B248 02B249 02B251 02B252, 02B253 02B254 02B255 02B256 02B257 02B25K
02B259 02B260 02B261,02B262,02B263 02B264 02B265 02B266 02B267 02B268 02B269
2001-0523-0001
IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION
Under
THE CROWN EMPLOYEES COLLECTIVE BARGAINING ACT
Before
THE GRIEVANCE SETTLEMENT BOARD
BETWEEN
Ontano Pubhc ServIce Employees Umon
(Group Gnevance Corcoran et al )
Gnevor
-and-
The Crown III RIght of Ontano
(Mimstn of the Attome, General)
Employer
BEFORE RandI H. Abramsk, Vice-ChaIr
FOR THE UNION Mark Barela,
Gnevance Officer
Ontano Pubhc ServIce Employees Umon
FOR THE EMPLOYER Man Gersht
Counsel
Management Board Secretanat
HEARING October 8 2002
2
ORDER
By agreement of the partIes, the folloWIng clanficatIOn of the March 14 2000 "Carvalho"
order regardIng reportIng pay IS hereby Issued
ReportIng Pay
ReportIng pay as descnbed In the Carvalho order (GSB#0871/94 1461/98 0945/99) wIll
be paid under the folloWIng CIrcumstances
1 The employee must commence work In a courtroom In a court proceedIng.
2 The court must be adjourned for a penod of tIme longer than the 60-mInute lunch
break, not IncludIng the approved paid set-up and take down tImes A break whIch
Includes a 60-mInute lunch and approved paid set-up and take down tIme does not
tngger reportIng pay as set forth In the Carvalho order A break In excess of that wIll
tngger reportIng pay
3 FolloWIng the adjournment, the employee must report to hIs/her supervIsor and advIse
the supervIsor that the court has been adjourned and that he/she IS avaIlable for work.
The supervIsor must then offer work to the employee, If work IS avaIlable If the
offered work IS as an employee In a court proceedIng, that employee must perform
the work. If the offered work IS not the work of an employee In a court proceedIng,
the employee may choose whether or not to perform the work. ThIS paragraph IS not
Intended to usurp an employee's 60-mInute responsIbIlIty free lunch break.
4 If the employee performs the offered work, the employee wIll be paid for all of the
hours worked.
5 If there IS no work offered, or the employee declInes the work, the employee wIll be
consIdered responsIbIlIty free and wIll not be paid for the responsIbIlIty free penod.
The employee wIll, however be paid for a mImmum of two hours upon return to an
assIgned court proceedIng. The partIes agree that assIgnment to a dIfferent courtroom
does not tngger reportIng pay unless there has been a break In proceedIngs as
described above In paragraph 2
6 The court utIlIzatIOn form and the employee's tIme sheet must accurately reflect both
the tIme In whIch the employee worked and the tIme In whIch the employee was
responsIbIlIty free Management wIll reVIew and venfy these forms at ItS dIscretIOn.
7 If management has a dIsagreement wIth an employee's tIme sheet, management wIll
reVIew the tIme sheet wIth the employee In a tImely manner
3
8 I shall remaIn seIzed wIth thIS matter
Issued at Toronto thIS 18th day of October 2002
Ran~am~; ~rnJ{[Jc
Vice-Chair