HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-0399.Chimilewski et al.04-02-06 Decision
Crown Employees Commission de ~~
Grievance Settlement reglement des griefs
Board des employes de la
Couronne
~-,...
Suite 600 Bureau 600 Ontario
180 Dundas Sl. West 180 rue Dundas Ouest
Toronto Ontario M5G 1Z8 Toronto (Ontario) M5G 1Z8
Tel. (416) 326-1388 Tel. (416) 326-1388
Fax (416) 326-1396 Telec. (416) 326-1396
GSB# 2002-0399 2002-0723 2002-0724 2002-1039 2002-1239 2002-1252, 2002-1253 2002-1254 2002-
1255 2002-1256 2002-1257 2002-1258 2002-1259 2002-1260 2002-1261 2002-1262,2002-1263 2002-
1264 2002-1265 2002-1266 2002-1267 2002-1682
UNION# 02B373 02B505 02B506 02B655 02D198 02D182,02D183 02D184 02D185 02D186 02D187
02D 188 02D 189 02D 190 02D 191 02D 192, 02D 193 02D 194 02D 195 02D 196 02D 197 2002-0605-0012
IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION
Under
THE CROWN EMPLOYEES COLLECTIVE BARGAINING ACT
Before
THE GRIEVANCE SETTLEMENT BOARD
BETWEEN
Ontano PublIc ServIce Employees Umon
(ChImIlewskI et al) Grievor
- and -
The Crown In RIght of Ontano
(Mimstry of Natural Resources) Employer
BEFORE Richard Brown Vice-Chair
FOR THE UNION Mark Barclay
Gnevance Officer
Ontano PublIc ServIce Employees Umon
FOR THE EMPLOYER Lon AselstIne
Staff RelatIOns Officer
Mimstry of Natural Resources
HEARING February 5 2004
2
DeCISIon
The gnevors were Group 3 seasonal employees m the MmIstry's fire program But
for the 2002 OPSEU stnke, they would have been recalled to work on vanous
staggered dates m Apnl of 2002
At the conclusIOn of the strike, the MmIstry and the gnevors executed
mdIvIdual employment contracts wIth a start date of May 6, 2002, the first workmg
day followmg the end of the strike At some pomt, mmIstry officials unIlaterally
amended some of those contracts to reflect the actual date of recall whIch preceded
May 6
The partIes agree that the MmIstry should not have unIlaterally changed the
contract start date after the contracts had been sIgned. As there IS no eVIdence that
any of the gnevors suffered any economIC loss flowmg from the changed date,
they are not entItled to damages or any form of rehef
The partIes also agree tlllS decIsIOn apphes to the RIckard et al gnevance
dated June 17, 2002 whIch has not yet been referred to tlllS Board
Dated at Toronto tlllS 6th day of February 2004
~
/. ......~ ~-----.
/ .
RIchard Brown
VIce-Chair