Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988-0809.Baijnauth et al & Bloom et al.93-02-09 'i ..(~, ONTARIO EMPLOYES DE LA COURONNB. J: CROWN EMPLOYEES DEL 'ONTARIO \; 1111 GRIEVANCE COMMISSION DE , SETTLEMENT REGLEMENT BOARD DES GRIEFS 180 OUNDAS STREET WEST SUtTf= 2100 TORONTO ONTARIO MSG lZ8 TELEPHONEITELEPHON~ (.: 16) 326- 388 180 RUE: OUNDAS OUE:ST BURE:AU 2100 TORONTO (ONTARIO) MSG lZ8 FACSIMILE ITELECOPIE (.: 16) J26- r 396 809/88, 810/88 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION under THE CROWN EMPLOYEES COLLECTIVE BARGAINING ACT Before THE GR.IEVANCE SETTLEMENT BOAllD BETWEEN OPSEU (Baijnauth et aI/Bloom et all Grievor - and - The Crown in Right of Ontario (Ministry of Government Services) Employer BEFORE M. Watters Vice-Chairperson I Freedman Me111ber D. Walkinshaw Member FOR THE H. Law GRIEVOR Grievance Officer ontario Public service Employees Union FOR THE S Patterson RESPONDBNT Counsel Legal Services Branch Management Board of Cabinet HEARING November 24, 1992 \ \ ~ i:" ...1) By way of an Award dated March 5, 1991 , this panel of the Board ordered the Employer to properly classify Quantity Surveyors and Senior Quantity Surveyors working in the Design Services Branch of the Ministry of Government Services Pursuant to our Award, the Employer prepared a new class standard for the Construction Cost Analyst series The Union, in this proceeding, asserted that this new standard does not reflect the findings contained within our earlier decision We were asked to declare that the standard does not adequately describe the nature of the work performed by these employees The new class standard is attached hereto as Schedule lA' . On page one (1) of the class standard, the work of the Construction Cost Analyst 2 (C C A 2) is described as including the largest and most complex projects The Union submitted that this language undervalues the grievors' duties It proposed that the class standard should indicate that the responsibilities of the C C A 2 .. generally" include such projects The Employer, in response, argued that the new language is sufficient for purposes of the class standards The additional language suggested was described as merely a semantic prOblem at best " It was asserted that the class standards, when read in their entirety, adequately describe the work performed by these grievors. The Board accepts the Employer's submission. We note, in this regard, that the responsibilities of the C C A 2 are more 1 .. . , ;,;.. fully described in the opening paragraph on page four (4) of the class standards The heading of 'Knowledge and SkillsJ on page five (5) also references large and complex proJects The Board is satisfied that, in an overa 11 sense, the complexity of the grievors' work is captured by the new class standard when read 1n its entirety Page two (2) of the class standard contains the following description of the role of the Construction Cost Analyst 1 (C C A 1) As members of the design team, they engage in the cost control process throughout the project design phase. . .. .. . .. . . . Incumbents are accountable for the accuracy and quality of cost estimates for design projects The Union submitted that, instead, the language should state "As cost experts on the design team, they engage in cost control throughout the project design phase . . Incumbents are accountable for providing effective cost control on projects and economy of design It was the position of the Union that the proposed class standards do not sUfficiently recognize the grievors as being the "cost experts" on the design team Additionally, we were urged to conclude that their level of accountability exceeds that outlined in the standards In response, the Employer asserted that the grievors' role as experts is expressly recognized in the class standards It was further submitted that their accountability is adequately described by the current language 2 .....' Specific reference is made of the grievers' status as cost experts in the sixth bullet point on page two (2) of the class standards Additionally, under the headlng of tKnowledge and Skills' on page three (3) , there is reference to their provision of advice and consultation on cost and design economy Nevertheless! we think that insufficient emphasis is given in the class standards to the grievors! role as cost experts on the design team In our judgment! this could be corrected by amending this part of the class standards to include a specific reference to this role! as suggested by the Union With respect to the second objection, the Board concludes that a more accurate description of the level of the grievors' accountability would be achieved by adding the Union's proposed wording to that advanced by the Employer The provision would then read Incumbents are accountable for the accuracy and quality of cost estimates for design projects and for providing effective cost control on projects and economy of design In our judgment, this language better reflects the nature of the grievorsJ accountability, particUlarly as it relates to the cost centrol process We do not wiSh to suggest, however, that these grievors are solely accountable for cost control and design economy Our earlier award recognizes that the design team is also involved in this process. The Board there notes that the Quantity Surveyors play "an integra 1 , albeit not exclusive role J in matters of cost control. 3 ; i ... The first characteristic duty of the C C.A 1 listed on page two (2) of the class standards is descrlbed as follows Analyzing written reports outlining proposed building functions and accomodation requirements and developing concept of probable building configuration, design complexity, site servicing problems, work to protect adjoining properties, etc t and preparing cost estimates .. The Union proposed that this statement be replaced by the I following description "In the absence of solid design data, they analyze available written reports outlining proposed building function and accomodation requirements, develop concept of prObable building design. such as building configuration. design complexity, site servicing problems, work to protect adjoining properties, etc , project costs on the basis of the design, prepare budget estimates It was submitted by the Union that the class standards do not capture the extent of design knowledge which is integral to the performance of the Job The Union's representative emphasized that such knowledge is particularly important at the commencement of a project given the lack of solid design data . the more the C C A 1 He suggested that the scarcer the data, must extrapolate based on their knowledge of design The Employer acKnowledged that the C C A 1 must have a working knowledge of architectural and engineering design principles and teChniques. Counsel noted that such knowledge is expressly provided for under the heading of IKnowledge and Skills' on page three (3) of the class standards. He further 4 .;, ~ agreed that relatively little information is available in the early going of a project Counsel suggested that this fact is also contemplated by the class standards, as presently worded The Board has been persuaded that the knowledge required of aCCA1, specifically with respect to design, is adequately captured by the class standards We accept the Employer's submission that it is expressly incorporated into the 'Knowledge and Skills' portion of the standard The first two (2) bullet points on page two (2) of the class standards suggest that the initial work on a project is performed in the absence of solid data After considering the point, we conclude that specific mention should be made of that fact The Board finds that otherwise, the present language is consistent with the tenor of our earlier award The third characteristic duty of the C C A.1 is described in ~ the class standards as "Examining completed working drawings and specifications and preparing detailed pre-tender estimates The Union proposed that this language be replaced by the fOllowing sentence uExamining completed working drawings and specifications, determining falr market value of construction projects by preparing detal1ed pre-tender estimates It was the position of the Union that the grlevors, as part of their cost control function, must ensure that the Ministry is Obtaining fair value for the monies expended The Union representative asserted 5 .. ~~ that the assessment of fa1r market value is a critical component of the grievors' responsibility In response, it was submitted by the Employer that the addition of the proposed language is unnecessary Counsel appeared to agree that a pre-tender estimate, based on working drawings and specifications, should normally reflect fair market value He arguedJ however I that it would be inappropriate to include the proposed language in a class standard Rather, we were urged to conclude that it would be more appropriate for inclusion in a position specification The Board has not been convinced that the additional language should form part of the class standards The sUbject of fair market value was not addressed in any depth at the original hearing Further, it was not a crucial factor in our assessment that the grievors were improperly classified under the former standards In the final analysis, we find the language 1n the new class standard,to be an adequate description of the task The fourth characteristic duty listed on page two (2) of the class standards reads Analyzing variances between pre-tender estimates and actual bids received The Union proposed that the words Ute determine the reasonableness of the bid" be added. Its representative submitted that this would better describe the nature of the task Counsel for the Employer argued that the proposed wording is unduly narrow and potentially just wrong He suggested that it ignores the involvement of the design team in issues relating to cost. 6 ! J After considering the submissions, the Board has not been persuaded that the current language is materially deficient or that a statement of purpose is necessary The sixth characteristic duty listed on page two (2) of the class standards reads "Monitoring project design developmentt deciding on potential for budget over-runs, and as cost experts, recommending to the mUlti-disciplinary design team less costly design alternatives (e g determining cost of alternative building configurationst materi a 1 s , systems etc ) , consulting with designers and professionals to effectively complete their responsibilities .. The Union suggested that this language be amended to state. Monitoring project design development, deciding on potential for budget overruns, providing more economic design solutions to design team architects and engineers (e g ), and provides remedial cost reduction strategies in order to keep the project within the budget as initially estimated It was the position of the Union that the current language does not adequately depict the grievors' role within the design team The union's representative submitted that they have primary responsibility to generate, assess and provide the most economic design solution These efforts require that they deal with architects and engineers on the design team. It was submitted that the C.C.A l's provide leadership on this issue given their status as cost experts. In response, it was asserted by the Employer that the present language fully captures the work performed by these employees Counsel stated that there is 7 little difference in substance between this language and that proposed by the Union He further suggested that the grievors' recommendations are directed to the design team and not merely to architects and engineers The Board concludes that the Employer's position is to be preferred We think that the current wording of the c1ass standards is a sufficient description of this aspect of the work of the C C A 1's We find that the phrase designers and professionals adequately covers the nature of their contacts The seventh characteristic duty of the C.C A 1 is described in the first bullet point on page three (3) of the class standards It provides as follows "Analyzing project costs by building elements and systems to evaluate economy of design solutions The Union proposed that this language be amended to read Analyzing project to evaluate design solutions in order to ensure economy of design" It advanced the same supporting arguments as made with respect to the sixth characteristic duty The Employer argued that this proposal was misleading as it suggests final authority rests with the C C A.1 for ensuring economy of design Counsel submitted that it ignores the involvement of the design team, the Project Coordinator and the Project Manager in this process He acknowledged, however, that the grievors have an integral role to play in this area 8 ~ The Board is not convinced that the present language misinterprets or undervalues the grievors' role vis a vis design economy Our award expressly states that the grievors work together with the design team to bring an excessively costly venture back within budget Ultimately, we have not been persuaded that the Employer's language should be changed The 'Knowledge and Skills' requirements set out on page three (3) of the class standards reads, in part Work requires a thorough knowledge of and skill in applying construction estimating techniques and practices and providing advice and consultation on cost and design economy The Union proposed the following addition to the class standards "Incumbents must have successfully completed the curriculum of the Canadian Institute of Quantity Surveyors or an equivalent combination of training and experience. Work requires a thorough knowledge of and skill in applying construction estimating and cost control techniques and practices. It was the position of the Union that the class standards should indicate that the C C A.1 has successfully completed the curriculum of the Canadian Institute of Quantity Surveyors or an equivalent combination of training and experience Its representative submitted that this level of knowledge is an essential foundation for the performance of the Job We were asked to find that failure to include this requirement in the class standards would leave the grievors' wrongly classified as 9 7 I their knowledge would remain undervalued It was noted that the . specifications for the Quantity Surveyor and Senior Quantity Surveyor positions require graduation from an accredited institute of technology with major courses in Quantity surveying and construction estimating, preferably with membership in Canadian Institute of Quantity Surveyors or an equivalent combination of training and experience The Board was provided with the curriculum of the aforementioned Institute We were told that it takes four (4) to five (5) years of part-time study to complete same It was further submitted that the class standards should specifically mention Knowledge and Sklll in cost control techniques as this is one (1) of the core functions of the jOb The Employer, in response, described this issue as one of credential ism It was submitted that it is government policy that selection criteria should be free of credentials except where required by statute, regulations or where a credential is the sole means of acquiring the skills, knowledge and ability necessary for effective performance Counsel argued that these preconditions dO not exist 1n this case He noted that even the Union conceded that the knowledge and skills may be obtained through equivalent training and experience. It was the position of the Employer that, ultimately, the Union's proposal adds nothing to the class standard 10 I i - ~ The Board, after considering the conflicting submissions, . has not been persuaded that the class standards should refer specifically to successful completion of the curriculum 1n question We think that, subject to one (1) caveat, the Employer's language adequately encompasses the knowledge and skill required in the pos1tion. In our Judgment, it would be preferable to clearly indicate that the advice and consultation is with respect to cost control and design economy. This would more aptly describe the type of knowledge and skill demanded of the C.C A 1 The fifth characteristic responsibility of the C C A.2 listed on page four (4) of the class standards reads "Liasing with other disciplines and ministry officials to obtain costs for items outside own area of responsibility, reviewing same against historical records to ensure accuracy and completeness of project estimates The Union proposed that the words other disciplines be replaced by a specific reference to englneers and architects" It was the Employer's response that this proposal would overly narrow the potential group of persons being liased with. From its perspective, the words other disciplines capture the broad field of individuals who are consulted by the grievors The Board does not see a real need to add the language advanced by the Union. We conclude that the Employer's wording 1 1 -: constitutes sufficient recognition that other professionals, such as engineers and architects, may be consulted and liased with by the C C A 2's The Construction Cost Analyst classifications have been placed within the Technical Services Category It was the Union's position that they should have been placed in the Scientific and Professional Services Category The award in Carlson/Maves, 596,601/90 (Kirkwood) was filed in support of the argument that the Grievance Settlement Board can look to whether a position has been placed in the correct category in deciding whether a grievor is properly classified Reference was made to a 1989 job posting for a Senior Quantity Surveyor This Employer stated therein that it required a professional Surveyor/Estimator The Board was also prpvided with excerpts from the Ontario Manual of Administration which describe the positions falling within both the Technical Services Category and the Scientific And Professional Services Category It was asserted by the Union that the latter category provides the best fit" for the Construction Cost Analyst positions We were urged to conclude, in this regard, that the grievors are required to continually exercise the professional discipline of cost control Reference was also made to a position specification. dated May, 1987, for an Estimating Officer in the Ministry of Transportation And Communications The position was classified as Engineering Services Officer 4 (Atypical) and was assigned to the Scientific And Professional Services Category It was further noted that the 12 ~ ~ supervisor of this position was assigned to the same category This Board was asked to follow this "practice In response, the Employer advised that the positions filled by these grievors have historically been assigned to the Technical Services Category Counsel noted that the issue of placement in this category was not raised at the first hearing He, therefore, submitted that the Union shouid be barred from contesting the issue in this proceeding He also filed a letter dated August 15, 1991 in which the Union, in the context of another dispute, suggested to the Director, Management Board of Cabinet, that issues of category placement should be held in abeyance pending the negotiation of an entirely new classification system for the Ontario Public Service It was the Union's assertion in this correspondence that, It makes no sense to lift one jOb class out of an existing category and place in another in the face of the projected overall review Counsel argued that, in view of that position, the Union should be estopped from arguing the issue of category in this case Alternatively. it was submitted on behalf of the Employer that the descriptions of the respective categories should be flexibly construed. It was argued that the Technical Services Category best captures the tasks performed by this group of employees Counsel asserted that their jOb does not require "the exercise of a scientific or professional discipline normally 13 '0 . I acquired through university graduation or professional designation in which membership is controlled by recognized associations or licensing bodies, . , so as to fall within the scope of the Scientific And Professional Services Category Lastly, we were asked not to follow the example cited from the Ministry of Transportation and Communications Counsel suggested that such example might be nothing more than "a single, sma 1 1 error which should not be compounded The Board agrees that this issue was not raised during the course of the earlier hearings which led ultimately to the issuance of our award. We are inclined to agree with the Employer that it Should have been addressed therein Nevertheless, in an effort to expedite the final resolution of these grievances, we are prepared to speak to this aspect of the dispute The Board has not been persuaded that the doctrine of estoppel is applicable here so as to preclude the Union from advancing a claim of improper placement in the Technical Services Category The Board has reviewed the descriptions of the two (2) categories of relevance to this case We have not been satisfied that the grievors' responsibilities in respect of cost control bring them within the Scientific And Professional Services Category We agree with the Employer that the positions are not caught by the preamble thereto More specifically, we are unable to find that the grievors exercise a scientific or professional 14 - ~ discipline normally acquired through university graduation or professional designation Further, the Board concludes that the various positions described in the Scientific And Professional Services Category are unlike the technical positions which are the sUbject of this case In the final analysis, we are satisfied that the best fit is the Technical Services Category That category includes positions where incumbents are engaged in "the review and recommendation on types of construction, materials, etc , and the preparation of estimates and specifications for tendering purposes II We accept the suggestion of the Employer that the review referred to therein could include an economic review such as would occur in the cost control process We also think that the review and recommendations could have a design element In summary, the Board finds that the above-language, while not totally descriptive Of the grievors' jOb, provides a sUbstantially better fit than the language used to describe positions in the Scientific And Professional Services Category For these reasons, we have not been persuaded that positions in the Construction Cost Analyst series more properly fall within the aforementioned category We note that the Union representative stated that he was not aSking for a Berrv type order in respect of this aspect of the case Lastly, the Board is not convinced that there is sufficient evidence before us relating to the practice in the Ministry of Transportation And Communications to justify the adjustment sought In any event, we would be reluctant to follow these precedents given our 15 - . I reading of the language used to describe the two (2) categories which are of relevance to this case The Board declares that, sUbject to the caveats referred to in this Award, the new class standards capture the core duties performed by these gr;evors Further, we declare that the level of knowledge and skill required is sUfficiently described We trust that our findings will permit the parties to finally resolve this long standing dispute Dated at Windsor, Ontario this Qtb day of February ,1993. ~ J LJa.:~ M V Watters, vice Chairperson L. gember 16 , CiJ ~:~~~~--- - _~.3~ ::-~, r-_=-~ _ ~c.~ed",le I A ~ i. ..J" '.....,:..'- _ ~ .ana :ategcry i l':.rc ..... -I l...... ........ TEClHCAL SERVICES 1 15-02 DRAf'lIofG, DESIGN AND ES'TlMAl1NG ---1 Series , I Class Coae CONSTRUC11ON COST ANALYST i I , CONSTRUCTION COST ANALYST , I The Construction Cost Analyst series covers those positions whose primary responsibilities include facilitating the economic construction, renovation and maintenance of new or existing pubfic buildings. , - There are two levels within this series as follows' I , i I i CONSTRUCT10N COST ANALYST 1 This is the full working level. Responsibilities are of varied scope and moderate complexity and require I the appfication ot considerable initiative and judgement 1 CONSTRUCTION COST ANALYST 2 I This is a senior working level. Responsibifities include the largest and most complex projects. , I I I l EffectIve Date Issued Page of 5 1 0808 (08189) @- ""'_....3'3 ~-~\. Cj,;:~S ~' SeNlce . ...............- -...;<" ............. ~ 'I. .15,;, "" ~ Onlano & Category i Growo TEaHCAL SERVICIS I TS-42 DRAFTlNG. DESIGN AND ES'TlIIAllHG , i Class Cooe Senes CONSTRucnON COST ANALYST I I CONSTRUCnON COST ANAlYST 1 Positions in this class prepare cost estimates for a variety of construction projects at the preliminary planning stage and for tender, induding estimating quantities of labour, materials, equipment. overheads etc., developing unit prices and developing projected cash-flow requirements. A$ members of the design team, they engage in the cost control process throughout the project design phase. They are iovolved in projects such as new office buildings, laboratory buildings, renovations to office buildings and garages, and leasehold improvements. The preliminary cost estimates serve as the basis for establishing project budgets for approval and for subsequent program and ministry financial planning. Incumbents are accountable tor the accuracy and Quality of cost estimates for design projects. Characteristic responsibilities may include the following' . Analyzing written reports outlining proposed building functions and accommodation requirements and developing concept of probable building configuration, design complexity, site servieng problems, work to protect adjoining properties, etc., and preparing cost estimates. . Interpreting preliminary sketches and reports, deciding on p/'Qbable final construction details and requirements and preparing detailed definitive cost estimates. . Examining completed working drawings and specifications and preparing detailed pre-tender estimates. . Analyzing variances between pre-tender estimates and actual bids received. . Developing project cash-flow projections by deciding on effect of factors such as project size, complexity, location, sequence of construction operations, seasonal productivity ete. . Monitoring project design development deciding on potential for budget over-runs, and as cost experts, recommending to the multi~iscip6nary design team less cosUy design alternatives (e.g., detennining CXlst of alternative building configurations, materials, systems etc.), consulting with designers and professionals to effectively complete their responsibilities. Effective Date Issued Page ') of 2 5 0808 (08189) @- :_,j.,SS S-..\NDARDS ~, Service f. :ommlSSiCr. Ontar,o : Caregory : GrOUD - lECHNCAL SERVICES I TS-02 DRAFTING, OESlGN AND ESl1IIA lING i i j Senes I I Class Cooe I CONSTRUC"nON COST ANALYST I I I i . Analyzing project costs by building elements and systems to evatuate economy of design solutions. I I - I . Performing analysis and checks on claims for extras and deductions from original contract prices; recommending action on the claims;generaJIy the recommendation forms the basis for the negotiated resolution. . Checking estimates. prepared by consultants. identifying errors and omissions and resoMng same with appropriate party Knowledae and Skills Work requires a thorough knowledge of construction materials. quantity requirements, methods and building systems and a working knowledge of architectural and engineering design principles and techniques. Abifity to understand and apply the content of design drawings and reports. Work requires a thorough knowledge of and skill in applying construction estimating techniques and practices and providing advice and consultation on cost and design economy Good problem-soMng. analytical. interpersonal and communications skills. ~ ... .....- - Effective Date Issued Page of 3 5 0808 (08189) ~ :;,VI) :L..ASS 3~ANDARCS . Sennee CommiSSion , Omano Category ! Group I TEClllCAL SERVICES I TS-02 DRAFTlNG, DESIGN AHD ES11IIA11NG Serres i Class Cooa CONS11WC1IONCOST ANALYST i I I I I CONSTRUCTION COST ANALYST 2 ; - Positions in this class are responsible for the largest and most intricate proiects. While they may perform all of the duties of level 1, they deal with added complexities arising from the types of projects assigned, such as difficult renovations; e.g. historical buildings or large new construction projects with complications due to complexity of design, overlapping of cost responsibilities, lack of precedents. Other characterisUc responsibilities may include the following: . Estimating costs by anticipating nature, scope and quality of design from limited design information available and by determining costs allowances for many variables and unforseen problems and design developments. . Preparing tender estimates from almost completed working drawings and developing cash.flows for same. ~ Developing multi-year cash.flow projects. . UtiDzing fife cycle costing methodologies to provide specialized insights into design economies. . Uaising with other discip6nes and ministry officials to obtain costs for items outside own area of responsibi6ty, reviewing same against historical records to ensure accuracy and completeness of project estimates. . Recommending solutions for contract disputes. . Providing technical coordination and guidance to level 1 cost analysts assigned to assist on very large projects or working in an underfill capacity Effective Date Issued Page of 4 5 0808 (08189) , ~ C,V:I SLASS STANDARDS Service ~ CommiSSion Or.tano Category Group -- TECfllCAL SERVICES TS-02 ORAFnNG., DESIGN AND ESiIIIAl1NG Series Class Code CONS1RUC'TION COST ANALYST Knowledae and Skills - In addition to the knowledge and skill required at level one, this work requires extensive knowledge of and skill in applying construction estimating techniques and practices in order to provide appropriate advice and I consultation to the design team and senior officials on large and complex projects. Good technical knowledge of architectural and engineering design. Thorough knowledge of life cycle costing and value management methodology Good leadership, coordination, interpersonal and oommunication skills. Excellent analytical and problem-soMng skills to deal with many variables and design developments. I Effective Date Issued Page 01 5 5 . 0808 (081891