Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDe Freitas 17-07-04IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION AWARD BETWEEN: UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK (The "Employer") OPSEU, LOCAL S71 (The "Union") AND in the matter of two individual grievances ARBITRATOR: William A. Marcotte APPEARANCES: FOR THE EMPLOYER: T. Agnew, counsel V. Trotman, dir., L.R. and others FOR THE UNION: A. Mathew, counsel J. Healy, pres., Loc. 571 P. Myers, OPSEU staff rep. L. Furgiuele, grievor K. De Freitas, gri.evor and others Hearing held in Toronto on June 29, 2017. 11 I was appointed by the parties under their collective agreement (the "Collective Agreement") to hear a grievance filed by Ms. Kim De Freitas on March 2, 2017 (the "De Freitas Grievance") and a grievance filed by Ms. Lina Furgiuele on May 24, 2017 (the "Furgiuele Grievance"). 2. The parties met on June 29, 2017 and agreed to participate in mediation/ arbitration under section 50 of the Labour Relations Act. 3. The De Freitas Grievance alleges breaches of the Collective Agreement, Employer policies, and, the Ontario Human Rights Code. The Furgiuele Grievance alleges breaches of the Collective Agreement related to her job transfer_ 4. Ms. De Freitas is a full-time Pharmacy Technician who currently works at the Employer's Toronto Western Hospital site. Ms. Furgiuele is a part- time Pharmacy Technician who was working at the Employer's Toronto Western Hospital site until May 2, 2017 when she was transferred to the Employer's Toronto General Hospital site. 5. It is fair to say that both grievances arise out of a long-standing, interpersonal conflict between Ms. De Freitas and Ms. Furgiuele that dates back to at least 2015. The Employer has made several attempts to address the issues between the gri.evors with little success. b. As the interpersonal conflict between the two grievors continued into 2017, the Employer decided to temporarily transfer Ms. Furgiuele to the Toronto General Hospital site, effective May 2, 2017, to provide an opportunity for a long term, sustainable solution. 7. Having heard the representations of the parties, I have determined that there have been no breaches of the Collective Agreement, Employer policies, or, any applicable legislation. Therefore, I order that both grievances are dismissed. In addition, I order the following: (a) Effective the date of this Award, Ms. F urgiuele's transfer to the Toronto General Hospital site will be considered indefinite and no longer temporary. (b) For a period of five years from the date of this award, Ms. Furgiuele will not be considered for any positions at the Toronto Western Hospital site as long as Ms. De Freitas remains employed there. University Health Network & OPSEU, Local. 571 July 2017 (c) For a period of five years from the date of this award, Ms. De Freitas will not be considered for any positions at the Toronto General Hospital site as long as Ms. Furgiuele remains employed there. (d) The intent of this Award is to keep Ms. De Freitas and Ms. Furgiuele working at different sites. However, nothing in this Award prevents the Employer from making staffing changes in the future that would otherwise be permitted by the Collective Agreement, as long as those decisions do not result in Ms. De Freitas and Ms. Furgiuele working at the same site. S. Nothing in this Award prevents the Employer from making transfers that would otherwise be permitted by the Collective Agreement, subject to the Union's right to challenge alleged violations through the grievance process. Dated at Toronto, this 41h day of July, 2017. William A. Marcotte Arbitrator University Health Network & OPSEU, Local 571 July 2017