HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004-3472.Gilbert.06-12-19 Decision
Crown Employees
Grievance Settlement
Board
Suite 600
180 Dundas Sl. West
Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z8
Tel. (416) 326-1388
Fax (416) 326-1396
Commission de
reglement des griefs
des employes de la
Couronne
Nj
~
Ontario
Bureau 600
180, rue Dundas Ouest
Toronto (Ontario) M5G 1Z8
Tel. : (416) 326-1388
Telec. : (416) 326-1396
GSB# 2004-3472,2004-3473,2004-3474
UNION# 2004-0248-0223,2004-0248-0224,2004-0248-0225
IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION
Under
THE CROWN EMPLOYEES COLLECTIVE BARGAINING ACT
BETWEEN
BEFORE
FOR THE UNION
FOR THE EMPLOYER
HEARING
Before
THE GRIEVANCE SETTLEMENT BOARD
Ontario Public Service Employees Union
(Gilbert)
- and -
The Crown in Right of Ontario
(Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services)
Barry Stephens
Scott Andrews
Grievance Officer
Ontario Public Service Employees Union
Mary-Jo Knappet
Staff Relations Officer
Ministry of Community Safety and
Correctional Services
May 24, 2006.
Union
Employer
Vice-Chair
2
Decision
INTRODUCTION
The parties have agreed to a Med-Arb Protocol, signed February 27, 2006. It is not necessary to
reproduce the entire Protocol here. Suffice it to say that, as part of the Protocol, the parties have
agreed to a "True Mediation-Arbitration" process, wherein each provides the vice-chair with
submissions, which include the facts and authorities each relies upon. The process adopted by
the parties provides for a canvassing of the facts during the mediation phase under the Protocol.
Arbitration decisions are issued in accordance with Article 22.16 of the collective agreement,
without reasons, and are without prejudice or precedent. The parties were unable to resolve this
matter in mediation.
Accordingly, the matter has been referred to me as a True
Mediation/Arbitration decision under the Protocol.
At the beginning of the session on May 24, 2006, it was determined that the union had not
provided the employer with full or appropriate Appendix B's, as required under the Protocol, and
as a result, the employer had been unable to prepare appropriate Appendix C's. I met with the
representatives of the parties, and it was agreed the three-day mediation session would proceed.
In order to assist the parties, I advised that the union would be expected to prepare appropriate
Appendix B' s prior to the discussion of any specific case. This they did, and, in the process,
numerous grievances were withdrawn by the union. The employer then reviewed each grievance,
and mediation was attempted. There were a number of grievances referred to arbitration, and the
employer was provided with a full opportunity to submit formal Appendix C's after the session.
FACTS
3
On September 24 and 25, 2003 the grievor left work sick after having a discussion with his
manager about a work assignment to a living unit, rather than the exercise yard. The employer
takes the position the grievor was not ill, but went home in protest against the employer's
unquestioned right to assign work under Article 2 - Management Rights. The grievor failed to
produce a medical certificate as required by Article 44.10, and the employer authorized a payroll
deduction for both days. The employer takes the position that, if the grievor had any concerns
with respect to his assigned work, he was required to "obey now, grieve later."
The union argues that the grievor went home sick due to the stress he encountered during the
disputes over his work assignments. The grievor advised the employer at the time that he was
going home sick, yet no request was made that the grievor bring a medical note to justify the
absence. It is now too late for the employer to seek such a note, and the grievances should be
upheld. The employer asserts that such a note is required under Article. 44.10 and that
assignment of work is a management right under Article 2.
DECISION
The grievances are upheld in part. The grievor is to be compensated for the two days. I will
remain seized to deal with any issues arising from the implementation of this decision.
Dated at Toronto, this 19th day of December, 2006.