Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005-2144.Hutton.07-01-31 Decision Crown Employees Grievance Settlement Board Suite 600 180 Dundas Sl. West Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z8 Tel. (416) 326-1388 Fax (416) 326-1396 Commission de reglement des griefs des employes de la Couronne Bureau 600 180, rue Dundas Ouest Toronto (Ontario) M5G 1Z8 Tel. : (416) 326-1388 Telec. : (416) 326-1396 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION Under Nj ~ Ontario GSB# 2005-2144 UNION# 2005-0368-0084 THE CROWN EMPLOYEES COLLECTIVE BARGAINING ACT BETWEEN BEFORE FOR THE UNION FOR THE EMPLOYER HEARING DEADLINE FOR WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS Before THE GRIEVANCE SETTLEMENT BOARD Ontario Public Service Employees Union (Hutton) - and - The Crown in Right of Ontario (Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services) Barry Stephens Scott Andrews Grievance Officer Ontario Public Service Employees Union Karen Martin Staff Relations Officer Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services December 14, 2006. January 17,2007. Union Employer Vice-Chair 2 Decision INTRODUCTION The parties have agreed to a Med-Arb Protocol, signed February 27, 2006. It is not necessary to reproduce the entire Protocol here. Suffice it to say that, as part of the Protocol, the parties have agreed to a "True Mediation-Arbitration" process, wherein each provides the vice-chair with submissions, which include the facts and authorities each relies upon. The process adopted by the parties provides for a canvassing of the facts during the mediation phase under the Protocol. Arbitration decisions are issued in accordance with Article 22.16 of the collective agreement, without reasons, and are without prejudice or precedent. The parties were unable to resolve this matter in mediation. Accordingly, the matter has been referred to me as a True Mediation/Arbitration decision under the Protocol. FACTS The grievor relocated to CECC from Brockville in May 2005. When he first arrived at CECC, he was asked to provide medical documentation to support an ongoing accommodation to work straight nights. The last time he had provided a medical certificate to support the accommodation was in early 2004. The grievor asserts that, having just started at CECC, he did not have a physician in the Lindsay area, so he was required to secure documentation from his doctor in Brockville. As a result, he claims both mileage (730 kms) from Lindsay to Brockville, as well as 8 hours overtime pay for the travel required. The employer responds that it does not pay for such expenses, and restricts compensation for medical certificates to the fee, if any, charged by the physician for the preparation of the document. 3 DECISION The grievance is dismissed. Dated at Toronto, this 31 st day of January, 2007.