Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005-2499.Taylor-Baptiste.07-03-05 Decision Crown Employees Grievance Settlement Board Commission de reglement des griefs des employes de la Couronne Nj ~ Ontario Suite 600 180 Dundas Sl. West Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z8 Tel. (416) 326-1388 Fax (416) 326-1396 Bureau 600 180, rue Dundas Ouest Toronto (Ontario) M5G 1Z8 Tel. : (416) 326-1388 Telec. : (416) 326-1396 GSB# 2005-2499 UNION# 2005-0229-0028 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION Under THE CROWN EMPLOYEES COLLECTIVE BARGAINING ACT Before THE GRIEVANCE SETTLEMENT BOARD BETWEEN Ontario Public Service Employees Union (Taylor-Baptiste) Union - and - The Crown in Right of Ontario (Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services) Employer BEFORE Barry Stephens Vice-Chair FOR THE UNION Stephen Giles and Scott Andrews Grievance Officers Ontario Public Service Employees Union FOR THE EMPLOYER Pauline Jones and Faith Crocker Staff Relations Officers Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services HEARING February 19,20 & 21, 2007. DEADLINE FOR WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS March 2, 2007. 2 Decision INTRODUCTION The Ministry and OPSEU have agreed to a Med-Arb Protocol, signed February 27, 2006. Although OCI is not one of the institutions covered by the protocol, the parties agreed on February 19,2007 to be bound by the terms of the protocol for this session. It is not necessary to reproduce the entire Protocol here. Suffice it to say that, as part of the Protocol, the parties have agreed to a "True Mediation-Arbitration" process, wherein each provides the vice-chair with submissions, which include the facts and authorities each relies upon. The process adopted by the parties provides for a canvassing of the facts during the mediation phase under the Protocol. Arbitration decisions are issued in accordance with Article 22.16 of the collective agreement, without reasons, and are without prejudice or precedent. The parties were unable to resolve this matter in mediation. Accordingly, the matter has been referred to me as a True Mediation/Arbitration decision under the Protocol. FACTS The grievor was divorced in 2000. Since that time he has been involved in litigation over access to his children. As a result, he states that he has been unable to arrange a suitable access schedule such that he can work a normal rotation on the schedule, and, at the same time, care for his children on the days when he has access. He states that he has been using compensating time off, vacation time and other methods to book himself off for shifts that conflict with his access schedule. He states that, when these methods do not work, he speaks to the scheduling officer and, so long as he provides sufficient notice, the scheduling officer will typically rearrange the schedule to assist the grievor. There is no evidence that the grievor is adjusting his schedule in 3 such a way as to avoid weekend or night shifts, or for any other reason than to book time off to coincide with his access schedule. He states that, as a result of the changes he has made to his schedule, he at times may work many days in a row, which indicates his willingness to make personal sacrifices, and not to put all of the burden on the employer. In juxtaposition to the arrangement described by the grievor, the employer states that the grievor does not make efforts to book himself off, but is engaged in a form of self scheduling, in that he simply presents his access arrangements to the scheduling officer, and has the scheduling officer rearrange matters to suit his needs. The employer further states that, while some accommodation to meet family status needs may be appropriate, the grievor has been accommodated for several years, and there is no indication he has given consideration to making alternative arrangements to care for his children, particularly as the children are now getting older. The employer argues that there are other employees with worthier accommodation claims who should be given priority. The grievor seeks an order that he be permitted to carry over compensating time off from year to year past the March 31 deadline set out in COR 13.6, so that he will have greater flexibility with respect to scheduling time off, and that the employer be required to accommodate his family needs in any other reasonable manner. DECISION The grievor will be permitted to utilize shift exchanges, compensating/lieu time and vacation credits (not limited to the Ministry protocol on local vacation selection) to facilitate time off for childcare. He will not be granted any special carry-over rights with respect to compensating time off. 4 If, after exhausting the above methods, the grievor is unable to arrange a desired day off, he may advise the scheduling officer of the conflict. If notice to the scheduling officer is sufficient, the employer will make reasonable efforts to rearrange the grievor's schedule to accommodate his requested time off. This arrangement will remain in effect until July 1, 2007, at which time it will be subject to review by the parties in accordance with the employer's family accommodation policy. Dated at Toronto, this 5th day of March, 2007. Barry