Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2017-3092.Perreault.18-05-07 Decision Crown Employees Grievance Settlement Board Suite 600 180 Dundas St. West Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z8 Tel. (416) 326-1388 Fax (416) 326-1396 Commission de règlement des griefs des employés de la Couronne Bureau 600 180, rue Dundas Ouest Toronto (Ontario) M5G 1Z8 Tél. : (416) 326-1388 Téléc. : (416) 326-1396 GSB# 2017-3092 UNION# 2017-0499-0068 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION Under THE CROWN EMPLOYEES COLLECTIVE BARGAINING ACT Before THE GRIEVANCE SETTLEMENT BOARD BETWEEN Ontario Public Service Employees Union (Perreault) Union - and - The Crown in Right of Ontario (Liquor Control Board of Ontario) Employer BEFORE Janice Johnston Arbitrator FOR THE UNION Alison Nielsen-Jones Ontario Public Service Employees Union Grievance Officer FOR THE EMPLOYER Erin Charbonneau Liquor Control Board of Ontario HR Manager Carlos Valencia Liquor Control Board of Ontario General Manager HEARING May 3, 2018 -2- Decision [1] The Employer and the Union agreed to participate in the expedited Mediation- Arbitration process in accordance with the Memorandum of Agreement found in Appendix 2 to the collective agreement. The majority of the grievances are normally settled pursuant to that process. However, where a mediated agreement is not attainable and the grievance remains unresolved, the parties have agreed that the Arbitrator will determine the matter without formal proceedings. The process provides that the Arbitrator shall issue a decision which shall be applicable only to the case heard, shall be without prejudice, shall not be used as a precedent for future cases and is not appealable. Any decision rendered must be issued within two weeks of the date of the hearing and shall provide only brief reasons, if any. [2] On May 3 and 4, 2018 the parties at Ottawa Retail Service Centre agreed to participate in the expedited Mediation-Arbitration process in accordance with the Memorandum of Agreement found in Appendix 2 to the collective agreement. The grievance that is the subject of this decision was one that the parties agreed to deal with. [3] The grievance before me alleges that the grievor was not appropriately scheduled hours of work according to his seniority and the collective agreement. After considering the submissions of the parties I am of the view that there has been no violation of the collective agreement. [4] The grievance is dismissed. Dated at Toronto, Ontario this 7th day of May, 2018. “Janice Johnston” Janice Johnston, Arbitrator