HomeMy WebLinkAboutSeguin 08-05-02
IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION
between
Ontario Public Service Employees Union
and
St. Clair College
Classification Grievance of Mike Seguin
Before:
Louis M. Tenace
For the College:
Joan Pocock, Manager Recruitment and Salary Administration
Patricia France, Chief Information Officer
Rick Duguay, Supervisor
For the Union:
Florry Lang, President
Sue McLelland, Chief Steward
Naz Binck
Mike Seguin
Heard in Windsor, Ontario, Tuesday, April 29, 2008
AWARD
Mike Seguin is currently employed at St. Clair College as a certified Plumber, a position
he has held since November 1999. From May 1989, he worked at the College as a
certified Electrician.
On June 20, 2007, he filed a grievance requesting that his position be reclassified from
payband H to payband I, retroactive to March 1,2007. The Position Description Form
(PDF) itself is not in dispute. It was signed by the grievor and his supervisor, Rick
Duguay, on June 7, 2007. What the grievor is disputing is the ratings accorded to three of
the factors contained therein, namely, Education, Experience and Audio Visual Effort.
Following is a summary of the disputed ratings:
1.A - Education
(not in dispute)
This factor refers to the basic level of formal education or certification required for the
position. In this case, the requirement is for a Plumber's Certificate of Qualification,
which, as noted above, the grievor possesses.
1.B - Education
College Rating -levell, 3 points,' Union Rating -level 4, 30 points
This factor refers to additional "courses, certification, qualification or accreditation" not
part of the requirement set forth in 1.A but which would be a "requirement prior to
commencement that would typically be included in the job posting".
The Union alleges that the position in question requires training in building management
systems as well as a requirement for the incumbent to perform some electrical work such
as assisting in minor repairs of electrical installations and systems. It is further alleged
that some of the duties of the position entail an additional requirement for the incumbent
to be qualified as a certified electrician as well as training in building management
systems. It was submitted that some of the duties require considerable electrical skills and
that this should be recognized in the PDF under Education 1.B. Several instances were
provided by the Union as examples of work performed by the incumbent in the past to
demonstrate that he had performed electrical work as part of his duties. The Union is
requesting that this factor be rated at level 4, with a point rating of 30.
2
The College, on the other hand, submitted that the incumbent is not required to perform
the work of an electrician. The incumbent is sometimes called upon to assist an
electrician, depending upon the nature of the task at hand. However, the electrician is
responsible for the work done and the "assisting" in question involves simple tasks of a
minor nature not requiring any special knowledge or technical skills. The incumbent is
required to exercise the skills of a plumber and there are no additional educational
requirements.
With respect to the need for the incumbent to be trained in "building management
systems", the College explained that this was an asset and not a requirement of the
position. Moreover, the College took it upon itselfto provide in-house training in this
area to those persons requiring it. The College has rated this at levell, with a point rating
of3.
The summary ofthe position as written in the PDF contains two references indicating
work of an electrical nature but, in both instances, they contain the modifier "assist"
when referring to the work to be performed, as the following excerpt from the position
summary illustrates:
........ assist in repairs and installation of electrical systems........ and assist
in minor electrical installation and repair..
Rick Duguay, the grievor's supervisor, was adamant that he would never ask a non-
electrician to perform electrical work and that, in fact, he had never done so. From time-
to-time, some non-electrician might assist an electrician to perform some task but it
would always be under the close and direct supervision of an electrician. However, he did
point out that, in his opinion, he did not consider electrical work to refer to something
along the lines of changing a light bulb or turning off a switch.
Based on what I have heard from the parties, I am satisfied that unqualified employees
are not required to perform work that would entail certain additional trade qualifications.
I am equally satisfied that the language does not presume that additional qualifications
are required to perform the "assisting" described. The language ofthe PDF noted is clear
inasmuch as it uses the modifier "assist" to describe the nature ofthe tasks. Nevertheless,
I believe it would be in the parties' best interests ifthey were to examine the pertinent
language and amend it in such a manner as to ensure its meaning is clear to all.
The rating for this factor remains unchanged at levell, with a point rating of 3.
3
2 - Exverience
College Rating -level 4, 54 points; Union Rating -level 5, 65 points
This factor refers to the number of years of experience, after acquiring the necessary
education or certification level, required to perform the duties of the position. It may be
less (or at times more) than the level of experience of the incumbent and does not
include the time needed to acquire the necessary education or certification level for the
position.
The Union submitted that previous PDF's for this position required five years or
experience and that to perform the duties properly, this amount of experience was
essential.
The College acknowledged that the previous norm was five years but believed that this
standard had been set too high and that three years of experience was more than enough
for an incumbent to perform the duties. There was also considerable on-the-job learning
that would take place. Moreover, it was a managerial prerogative to set the education and
experience requirements. The College has rated this at level 4, with a point rating of 54.
Neither party offered very much to substantiate their position. The Union felt that the
worth of the position was being devalued while the College believed that three years of
experience following acquisition of the necessary certification was more than sufficient
to perform the duties. Under the circumstances, I must defer to management's decision.
The rating for this factor remains unchanged at level 4, with a point rating of 54.
10. AudioNisual Effort
College Rating -level 2, 20 points; Union Rating -level 2, 35 points
This factor measures the requirement for audio or visual effort in terms of the degree of
attention or focus required to perform tasks as well as taking into consideration activities
over which there is little control making the maintenance of focus difficult. The "Notes to
Raters" contained in the Job Evaluation Manual are quite extensive and helpful in
evaluating PDF's in this area.
The Union submitted that the duties involve multi-tasking which makes it difficult for
incumbents to maintain focus. They carry radios which create frequent interruptions and
distractions resulting in a need to refocus on tasks.
4
The College acknowledged that there are interruptions but these are a normal part of the
duties which require an individual to go from one task to another to effect repairs.
On some occasions, when a specific part is needed, it may take a week or two for the
individual to get back to the task. Moreover, there is usually a person who has no specific
tasks to perform at that time who is assigned to respond to service calls. The tasks are not
usually of a nature where concentrated and uninterrupted focus is essential. College
records submitted show that during a two-year period from March 2006 and March 2008,
there were no emergency work orders issued (requiring one day to respond) and 96
urgent work orders (two days to respond). It was noted that there are two other Plumbers
on staff. It was explained that a common occurrence might be a backed-up toilet but that
this would not necessarily be an emergency situation unless, of course, water was flowing
freely onto the floor.
The PDF for this position acknowledges that concentration and focus usually can be
maintained throughout the duration of two of the three activities identified as relevant to
the tasks to be performed. However, it does allow that this is not the case when multi-
tasking or responding to emergency repair situations. Based on the evidence submitted,
true emergencies are infrequent. Using the "Notes to Raters" as a guide, I am satisfied
that, for the most part, there is no difficulty for the incumbent to maintain focus for the
typical tasks assigned. While there may be interruptions, the tasks are not of such a nature
that the incumbent would find it difficult to resume a previous one on which he/she may
have been working.
The rating for this factor remains unchanged at level 2, with a point rating of 20.
In conclusion, it is my finding that the levels and point rating for this PDF remain
unchanged and that the position continues to be classified at payband H, 541 points.
The completed Data Arbitration Sheet is attached.
I wish to thank the parties for their co-operation and candour during the course of the
hearing.
Signed in Ottawa, this 2nd day of May, 2008.
Louis M. Tenace (arbitrator)
Arbitration Data Sheet. Support Staff Classification
~'''1
l_. conege:~ Incumbent (Y\1J(E.5f.&W,V Supervisor' RICK
Current Payband: ---'=I Payband Requested by Grievor: -r
1. Concerning the attached Position Description Form:
o The parties agreed on the contents 0 The Union disagrees with the contents and the specific
details are attached.
2, The attached Written Submission Is from: 0 The Union 0 The College
.... .' "" ""''''11'''.: ,.. .....,.... ,.'....tl.'.". "." " ..... ......" .....::... .,.::A...rbi'....'It..'..........."..........:...... '.' ..."
;...;,';"j; . ;~~~,.,;+:~:~,:." .:.;;;~,'~::~~ni~':>:i ,.' : :' .......:~:. Union'. .. '. ..""," . .
.- ';'/; i:S':. RIQIlla'IRIoImg 0ccasI0nII ~lIIll.tcUring 0cwI<Nl Regular/Recurrln~ 0ccIsl0nII
.~I." ,~\ ~ \/~
:-:~ .W:~'" 1 ~.~~ ~II~ jll
:, 7~ '1.. 7'i5 ~ i~r"
~ .~.2. Gl 3~ 7_ ~.,
''5 I 5 J .('
'2 !L~ '2 7~ ~ 1t6
b ~'i h4 act 2. L.q
.,::) '7~ ::2 7~ "7 19-
'2, 4, '2, if1 . ~ tJ1
9.. ao.... a.. 35..... z. 2.0-
?1 ,Cf-rr-l" ,~bqr-r1 ~ bct.rT1
(al '5./ (b) (a) 5'1 g (b) (al(L I (b)
flL 5Q<is" ~ ,. I
-\.4 'L H
3. Analysis and Problem SolvIng
4. PlannlnglCoordlnaUng.
(~:: :::~::~::
7. Service Delivery
8. Commurdcallon
9. Physll;al Effort
10. AudloN1sual Effort
11.. Worklng EnvIronment
Subtoteb
Total Pointa (a) + (b)
R..ultlnll Payblnd
~L
(Grlevor)
~.
~ ~G it. tf"l.J """ J.J MauL :)~l()i
~e Represenlatlve) (Date)
.~ O/'?
tel
&.0, ploT
tel I
.., 0 IL :/J OV"
~
1. ~o1
(Dale of A