Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutUnion 18-04-19In the Matter of an Arbitration Between Art Gallery of Ontario (employer) And OPSEU (union) Before: M. Brian Keller, Arbitrator Alan Freedman, for the employer Jesse Gutman, for the union Hearing in Toronto, January 26, 2018 - 2 - AWARD This award deals with a policy grievance that OPSEU filed in relation to the contracting out of audio-visual services that are provided for events at the Gallery. The grievance was referred to arbitration and I was appointed by the parties as a sole arbitrator to hear the grievance. At the outset of the hearing on January 26, 2018, the parties agreed to have me act as a mediator-arbitrator under section 50 of the Labour Relations Act, 1995. They further agreed to expand my jurisdiction beyond the terms of the grievance to deal with all issues raised by the parties in the mediation phase of this case. This award sets out my decision on these issues. The grievance alleges a breach of Article 36.01 of the full-time collective agreement and Article 21.01 of the part-time collective agreement between the parties. These provisions state: Full-Time Collective Agreement ARTICLE 36— CONTRACTING OUT 36.01 No Bargaining Unit employee shall be laid off or terminated as a result of the employer contracting out any of its work or services. No union positions shall be contracted out when an employee can perform the position and all such positions shall be posted in accordance with Article 17— Vacancies and New Positions. In circumstances where the Gallery is considering using third party services due to scheduling, resource, technical, or capacity reasons, the Department Manager will meet with the Local President or designate to seek advice and discuss where the capacity to service may be met with in-house resources, the type of third party service to be utilized, and the duration of the assignment. Part-Time Collective Agreement ARTICLE 21 — CONTRACTING OUT 21.01 No regular part-time Bargaining Unit employee shall be laid off or terminated as a result of the Employer contracting out any of its work or services. In the circumstances where the Gallery is considering using third- party services due to scheduling, resource, technical, or capacity reasons, the Department Manager will meet with the Local President or designate to seek advice and discuss where the 3 capacity to service may be met with in-house resources, the type of third-party service to be utilized, and the duration of the assignment. At the hearing, it became apparent that the real issue in the grievance was the Gallery's ability to contract out audio-visual services for events instead of assigning the work to occasional part-time employees. The grievance was therefore really about the parties' rights under Article 21.01 of the part-time collective agreement. In issuing this award, I have determined that it is appropriate to make a demarcation between internal and external events. The following definitions will generally apply to internal and external events unless otherwise mutually agreed between the parties: •Internal events: Any event booked by an internal department such as education lectures and public programming, Development donor and sponsor recognition events, Curator and President Circle events, Volunteer events, etc. •External events: Any event booked by an external corporate or private client such as weddings, bar mitzvahs, conferences, corporate AGMs, trade shows, product launches, corporate galas, etc. Audio-visual services shall be generally provided in the following manner unless otherwise mutually agreed between the parties: •All audio-visual requirements for external events at the Gallery, with the exception of those located in Jackman Hall, may be contracted out by the Gallery to be handled through a third party audio-visual services provider. •Jackman Hall will be serviced exclusively by in-house audio-visual services (for clarity, the issue of contracting out the work or services of projectionists working in Jackman Hall was not covered by the instant Grievance and is not covered by this award). •In-house audio-visual services will have first refusal on all internal events. If it is determined by the Gallery that in-house audio-visual services are unable to service an internal event due to scheduling, resource, technical or capacity reasons, then the Gallery may contract out such work to a third party provider. •As an exception to the above, the Gallery may contract out audio-visual services for large scale internal fundraising events such as Shadow Ball and Massive Party where the capacity to service is beyond in-house resources. In these exceptional circumstances, however, Gallery employees will continue to service all audio-visual requirements of artwork commissioned for those events. 4 Article 21.01 of the part-time collective agreement remains the governing provision in respect of contracting out and the parties shall abide by its terms. The second paragraph of Article 21.01 states that where the Gallery is considering using third party services due to scheduling, resource, technical or capacity reasons, the Department Manager will meet with the Local President or designate "to seek advice and discuss where the capacity to service may be met with in-house resources, the type of third party service to be utilized, and the duration of the assignment" In my view, it is appropriate that a committee be established for the purpose of discussing the Gallery's audio-visual services operation, including its audio-visual services capacity. The establishment and meetings of this committee in accordance with the terms of this award shall be deemed to satisfy the obligations set out in the second paragraph of Article 21.01 of the part-time collective agreement insofar as audio-visual services are concerned. There shall be an equal number of Union and Management members on the committee, with the Union members consisting of two employees, the OPSEU Local President or designate and the OPSEU Staff representative. The committee shall meet every six months or, if the parties mutually agree, more frequently. The committee shall engage in meaningful discussion of the matters covered by Article 21.01. When the Gallery's contract with its current third party audio-visual services provider comes up for renewal and before the Gallery goes to market again for these services, the Union can make representations at the committee in support of trying to have more of this work assigned to employees in the bargaining unit. The Gallery, however, retains the sole discretion to make decisions regarding the contracting out of audio-visual work or services within the terms of Article 21.01. At the same time, the Union retains the ability to assert its rights under Article 21.01. I shall remain seized with any issues arising from the implementation of this award. Ottawa, this 19th day of April, 2018 M. Brian Keller, arbitrator