HomeMy WebLinkAbout2019-1804.Gondosch.20-09-30 DecisionCrown Employees
Grievance Settlement
Board
Suite 600
180 Dundas St. West
Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z8
Tel. (416) 326-1388
Fax (416) 326-1396
Commission de
règlement des griefs
des employés de la
Couronne
Bureau 600
180, rue Dundas Ouest
Toronto (Ontario) M5G 1Z8
Tél. : (416) 326-1388
Téléc. : (416) 326-1396
GSB# 2019-1804
UNION# 2019-5112-0213
IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION
Under
THE CROWN EMPLOYEES COLLECTIVE BARGAINING ACT
Before
THE GRIEVANCE SETTLEMENT BOARD
BETWEEN
Ontario Public Service Employees Union
(Gondosch) Union
- and -
The Crown in Right of Ontario
(Ministry of the Solicitor General) Employer
BEFORE
Gail Misra
Arbitrator
FOR THE UNION
Dan Sidsworth
Ontario Public Service Employees Union
Grievance Officer
FOR THE EMPLOYER Michelle LaButte
Treasury Board Secretariat
Employee Relations Advisor
HEARING July 10 and September 28, 2020 (by
videoconference)
-2-
DECISION
[1] Since the spring of 2000 the parties have been meeting regularly to address matters of
mutual interest which have arisen as the result of the Ministry of Community Safety and
Correctional Services (now, the Ministry of the Solicitor General) as well as the Ministry
of Children and Youth Services restructuring initiatives around the Province. Through
the MERC (Ministry Employment Relations Committee) a subcommittee was established
to deal with issues arising from the transition process. The parties have negotiated a
series of MERC agreements setting out the process for how organizational changes will
unfold for Correctional and Youth Services staff and for non-Correctional and non-Youth
Services staff.
[2] The parties agreed that this Board would remain seized of all issues that arise through
this process and it is this agreement that provides me the jurisdiction to resolve the
outstanding matters.
[3] Over the years as some institutions and/or youth centres decommissioned or reduced in
size others were built or expanded. The parties have made efforts to identify vacancies
and positions and the procedures for the filling of those positions as they become
available.
[4] The parties have also negotiated a number of agreements that provide for the “roll-over”
of fixed term staff to regular (classified) employee status.
[5] Hundreds of grievances have been filed as the result of the many changes that have
taken place at provincial institutions. The transition subcommittee has, with the
assistance of this Board, mediated numerous disputes. Others have come before this
Board for disposition.
[6] It was determined by this Board at the outset that the process for these disputes would
be somewhat more expedient. To that end, grievances are presented by way of
statements of fact and succinct submissions. On occasion, clarification has been sought
from grievors and institutional managers at the request of the Board. This process has
served the parties well. The decisions are without prejudice but attempt to provide
guidance for future disputes.
[7] Michael Gondosch is a Correctional Officer (“CO”) at the Toronto South Detention Centre
(“TSDC”). He filed a grievance on September 17, 2019 claiming that contrary to various
terms of the collective agreement, the Employer circumvented a long-standing process
for rollovers by secretly converting certain Fixed Term (“FXT”) COs and bypassed the
next eligible FXT CO, which appears to be referring to the Grievor himself. By way of
remedy, the Grievor seeks to be immediately converted to permanent regular status as
an employee and to be made whole.
-3-
[8] The Grievor appears to believe that on some unspecified date he was bypassed on a
rollover based on having been a few hours short of qualifying. He further believes that
had he been credited with certain hours retroactively, he would have qualified. This
belief arises out of a set of circumstances flowing from a disciplinary issue which Mr.
Gondosch had grieved on November 14, 2017. That grievance was mediated to a
resolution on March 11, 2019. As a result of the Memorandum of Settlement, the Grievor
was given 12 hours credit. It is as a result of that settlement that the Grievor believes
that he would have qualified for a rollover that occurred at the unspecified time.
[9] The MOS that resolved Mr. Gondosch’s disciplinary grievance did not have any
retroactive effect, so the point at which the 12 hours would have been credited to the
Grievor’s service would have been from the effective date of that settlement. The Grievor
was credited with the requisite hours, and on January 29, 2020, Mr. Gondosch was part
of a group of 49 COs who were rolled over as a result of a Memorandum of Agreement
(“MOA”).
[10] From a review of the January 29, 2020 rollover MOA, it is clear that even if the Grievor
had been credited with 12 hours retroactively, those hours would have made no
difference to his standing on the seniority list of FXT COs who were in line to fill vacancies
at the TSDC. Mr. Gondosch was fifth on the list of those who were rolled over on January
29th. The individual directly above Mr. Gondosch on the list of accumulated hours had
6,666.75 hours, compared to the Grievor’s 6,388 hours, a difference of 278.75 hours.
Looking at the person with the highest number of hours on the list of those who were
rolled over on January 29th, that individual had 8,021 hours. As such, that individual had
1,633 hours more than the Grievor. As there were clearly four FXT COs ahead of the
Grievor on the list, and since even the closest person to Mr. Gondosch had far more than
12 hours more than he did, it is difficult to see how the Grievor could have qualified for
any earlier rollover.
[11] In any event, there is no evidence to support a finding that there was a secret conversion
of FXTs to permanent status and that the Grievor was intentionally bypassed. It seems
apparent that at the time of the rollover previous to the filing of the grievance, the Grievor
did not have enough hours to qualify for rollover when compared to the other FXT COs
ahead of him who had obviously also not qualified before, and who had markedly more
hours than he did.
[12] Having considered the facts, and the submissions of the parties, and for the reasons
outlined above, this grievance is dismissed.
Dated at Toronto, Ontario this 30th day of September, 2020.
“Gail Misra”
_____________________
Gail Misra, Arbitrator