HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001-1234.Ranck.09-04-23 Decision
Commission de Commission de
Crown Employeess
Grievance Settlement Grievance Settlement
règlement des griefs règlement des griefs
BoardBoard
des employés de la des employés de la
Couronne Couronne
Suite 600 Suite 600 Bureau 600 Bureau 600
180 Dundas St. West 180 Dundas St. West 180, rue Dundas Ouest 180, rue Dundas Ouest
Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z8 Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z8 Toronto (Ontario) M5G 1Z8 Toronto (Ontario) M5G 1Z8
Tel. (416) 326-1388 Tel. (416) 326-1388 Tél. : (416) 326-1388 Tél. : (416) 326-1388
Fax (416) 326-1396 Fax (416) 326-1396 Téléc. : (416) 326-1396 Téléc. : (416) 326-1396
GSB#2001-1234 GSB#2001-1234
UNION#2001-0119-0006, 2001-0119-0007 UNION#2001-0119-0006, 2001-0119-0007
IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION
UUnnddeerr
THE CROWN EMPLOYEES COLLECTHE CROWN EMPLOYEES COLLECTIVE BARGAINING ACT TIVE BARGAINING ACT
BBeeffoorree
THE GRIEVANCE SETTLEMENT BOARD THE GRIEVANCE SETTLEMENT BOARD
BETWEENBETWEEN
Ontario Public Service Employees Union
èÏÔÎÏ
(Ranck)
- and -
The Crown in Right of Ontario
(Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services)
Employer
BEFOREVice-Chair
Barry Stephens
FOR THE UNION
Anastasios Zafiriadis, Frank Inglis
Ontario Public Service Employees Union
Grievance Officers
FOR THE EMPLOYERGreg Gledhill, Sean Milloy
Ministry of Community Safety and
Correctional Services
Staff Relations Officers
HEARINGFebruary 18, 2009.
DECISION
[1]The parties have agreed to an Expedited Mediation-Arbitration Protocol. It is not
necessary to reproduce the entire Protocol here. Suffice it to say that the parties have
agreed to a ?True Mediation-Arbitration? process, wherein each provides the Vice-Chair
with submissions, which include the facts and authorities each relies upon. This decision
is issued in accordance with the Protocol and with Article 22.16 of the collective
agreement, and is without prejudice or precedent.
[2]The grievor filed two grievances relating to allegations of discrimination and unfair
distribution of overtime. The union presented evidence at the hearing that reasonable
efforts had been made to investigate the grievor?s complaint but that no evidence could
be submitted. In my view, the union has had sufficient time to investigate and
particularize the grievances. There being no evidence proffered to support the grievor?s
case, the grievances are dismissed.
rd
Dated at Toronto this 23 day of April 2009.
Barry Stephens, Vice-Chair