Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008-3421.Whitehouse.09-06-16 Decision Commission de Crown Employees Grievance Settlement règlement des griefs Board des employés de la Couronne Suite 600 Bureau 600 180 Dundas St. West 180, rue Dundas Ouest Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z8 Toronto (Ontario) M5G 1Z8 Tel. (416) 326-1388 Tél. : (416) 326-1388 Fax (416) 326-1396 Téléc. : (416) 326-1396 GSB#2008-3421 UNION#2008-0617-0063 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION Under THE CROWN EMPLOYEES COLLECTIVE BARGAINING ACT Before THE GRIEVANCE SETTLEMENT BOARD BETWEEN Ontario Public Service Employees Union (Whitehouse) Union - and - The Crown in Right of Ontario (Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services) Employer BEFOREBarry Stephens Vice-Chair FOR THE UNIONAnastasios Zafiriadis, Frank Inglis & Greg McVeigh Ontario Public Service Employees Union Grievance Officers FOR THE EMPLOYER Karen Martin & Brian Scott Staff Relations Officers Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services HEARINGJune 12, 2009. -2- Decision [1]The parties have agreed to an Expedited Mediation-Arbitration Protocol. It is not necessary to reproduce the entire Protocol here. Suffice it to say that the parties have agreed to a ?True Mediation-Arbitration? process, wherein each provides the Vice-Chair with submissions, which include the facts and authorities each relies upon. This decision is issued in accordance with the Protocol and with Article 22.16 of the collective agreement, and is without prejudice or precedent. [2]The grievance in this case relates to an overtime shift on December 13, 2008. The employer called the grievor?s cell phone to offer her the shift in question. She was not near her cell phone at the time of the call and missed the shift. However, the grievor alleges that the employer was aware of her home phone number and that she normally received calls for overtime shifts on that number. The employer states there is no evidence that the grievor?s home number was on the overtime call sheet at the time. [3]After reviewing the submissions of the parties and the collective agreement, it is my conclusion that the grievance should be upheld in part. The grievor is to be compensated with six hours at overtime rates. th Dated at Toronto this 16 day of June 2009. Barry Stephens, Vice-Chair