HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007-1299.Taylor.09-12-08 Decision
Commission de Commission de
Crown Employeess
Grievance Grievance
règlement des griefs règlement des griefs
Settlement Board Settlement Board
des employés de la des employés de la
Couronne Couronne
Suite 600 Suite 600 Bureau 600 Bureau 600
180 Dundas St. West 180 Dundas St. West 180, rue Dundas Ouest 180, rue Dundas Ouest
Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z8 Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z8 Toronto (Ontario) M5G 1Z8 Toronto (Ontario) M5G 1Z8
Tel. (416) 326-1388 Tel. (416) 326-1388 Tél. : (416) 326-1388 Tél. : (416) 326-1388
Fax (416) 326-1396 Fax (416) 326-1396 Téléc. : (416) 326-1396 Téléc. : (416) 326-1396
GSB#2007-1299 GSB#2007-1299
UNION#2007-0368-0094UNION#2007-0368-0094
IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION
UUnnddeerr
THE CROWN EMPLOYEES COLLECTHE CROWN EMPLOYEES COLLECTIVE BARGAINING ACT TIVE BARGAINING ACT
BBeeffoorree
THE GRIEVANCE SETTLEMENT BOARD THE GRIEVANCE SETTLEMENT BOARD
BETWEENBETWEEN
Ontario Public Service Employees Union
èÏÔÎÏ
(Taylor)
- and -
The Crown in Right of Ontario
(Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services) Employer
BEFOREVice-Chair
Felicity D. Briggs
FOR THE UNION
Laura Josephson
Ontario Public Service Employees Union
Grievance Officer
FOR THE EMPLOYER
Brian Scott
Ministry of Community Safety and
Correctional Services
Staff Relations Officer
HEARING
October 22, 2009.
- 2 -
DECISION
[1]The Employer and the Union at the Central East Correctional Centre agreed to participate
in the Expedited Mediation-Arbitration process in accordance with the negotiated
Protocol. Most of the grievances were settled through that process. However, a few
remained unresolved and therefore require a decision from this Board. The Protocol
provides that decisions will be issued within a relatively short period of time after the
actual mediation sessions and will be without reasons. Further, the decision is to be
without prejudice and precedent.
[2]Vicki Taylor is an unclassified Correctional Officer who filed a grievance that alleged
she should have been paid at overtime rates for hours worked in excess of forty.
[3]After considering the facts and submissions of the parties, I am of the view that in the
very peculiar circumstances of this case there is no violation of the Collective Agreement.
th
Dated at Toronto this 8 day of December 2009.
Felicity D. Briggs, Vice-Chair