HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007-3102.Tsangaris.09-12-18 Decision
Commission de Commission de
Crown Employeess
Grievance Settlement Grievance Settlement
règlement des griefs règlement des griefs
BoardBoard
des employés de la des employés de la
Couronne Couronne
Suite 600 Suite 600 Bureau 600 Bureau 600
180 Dundas St. West 180 Dundas St. West 180, rue Dundas Ouest 180, rue Dundas Ouest
Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z8 Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z8 Toronto (Ontario) M5G 1Z8 Toronto (Ontario) M5G 1Z8
Tel. (416) 326-1388 Tel. (416) 326-1388 Tél. : (416) 326-1388 Tél. : (416) 326-1388
Fax (416) 326-1396 Fax (416) 326-1396 Téléc. : (416) 326-1396 Téléc. : (416) 326-1396
GSB#2007-3102 GSB#2007-3102
UNION#2008-0530-0001UNION#2008-0530-0001
IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION
UUnnddeerr
THE CROWN EMPLOYEES COLLECTHE CROWN EMPLOYEES COLLECTIVE BARGAINING ACT TIVE BARGAINING ACT
BBeeffoorree
THE GRIEVANCE SETTLEMENT BOARD THE GRIEVANCE SETTLEMENT BOARD
BETWEENBETWEEN
Ontario Public Service Employees Union
(Tsangaris)
Union
- and -
The Crown in Right of Ontario
(Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services)
Employer
BEFOREVice-Chair
Deborah J.D. Leighton
FOR THE UNION
Anastasios Zafiriadis and Frank Inglis
Ontario Public Service Employees Union
Grievance Officers
FOR THE EMPLOYER
Gary Wylie and Greg Gledhill
Ministry of Community Safety and
Correctional Services
Staff Relations Officers
HEARINGDecember 1, 2009.
-2-
Decision
[1]Mr. Emmanouel Tsangaris, a Cook 4 at the Toronto Jail, grieved January 21, 2008,
alleging that the employer was not exercising its management rights reasonably when it
posted schedules for the cooks, and it had failed to distribute overtime fairly. The
employer denied that it had violated the collective agreement.
[2]The parties referred this grievance to mediation/arbitration in accordance with Article
22.16 of the collective agreement. At the outset of the hearing the parties agreed that I
had the jurisdiction to deal with this matter. They asked that I issue a decision without
precedent or prejudice, and without written reasons in accord with the policy of the
parties for expedited hearings under Article 22.16.
[3]Having carefully considered the submissions of the parties, as well as the jurisprudence
of the Board, I hereby deny this grievance.
th
Dated at Toronto this 18 day of December 2009.
Deborah J.D. Leighton, Vice-Chair