Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009-2531.Cranley.10-01-05 Decision Commission de Commission de Crown Employeess Grievance Grievance règlement des griefs règlement des griefs Settlement Board Settlement Board des employés de la des employés de la Couronne Couronne Suite 600 Suite 600 Bureau 600 Bureau 600 180 Dundas St. West 180 Dundas St. West 180, rue Dundas Ouest 180, rue Dundas Ouest Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z8 Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z8 Toronto (Ontario) M5G 1Z8 Toronto (Ontario) M5G 1Z8 Tel. (416) 326-1388 Tel. (416) 326-1388 Tél. : (416) 326-1388 Tél. : (416) 326-1388 Fax (416) 326-1396 Fax (416) 326-1396 Téléc. : (416) 326-1396 Téléc. : (416) 326-1396 GSB#2009-2531 GSB#2009-2531 UNION#UNION#2007-0467-00262007-0467-0026 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION UUnnddeerr THE CROWN EMPLOYEES COLLECTHE CROWN EMPLOYEES COLLECTIVE BARGAINING ACT TIVE BARGAINING ACT BBeeffoorree THE GRIEVANCE SETTLEMENT BOARD THE GRIEVANCE SETTLEMENT BOARD BETWEENBETWEEN Ontario Public Service Employees Union èÏÔÎÏ (Cranley) - and - The Crown in Right of Ontario (Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services) Employer BEFOREVice-Chair Deborah J.D. Leighton FOR THE UNION Anastasios Zafiriadis Grievance Officer Ontario Public Service Employees Union Frank Inglis Grievance Officer Ontario Public Service Employees Union FOR THE EMPLOYER Gary Wylie Staff Relations Officer Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services Brian Scott Staff Relations Advisor Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services HEARINGDecember 15, 2009. - 2 - DECISION [1] Mr. Michael Cranley, a correctional officer at Quinte Detention Centre, grieved on February 17, 2007 alleging that the employer had not treated him fairly in ?balancing his hours?, when he made the transition from the unclassified to the classified service ( at the end of his first schedule). The employer took the position that it had not violated the collective agreement or done anything to treat the grievor differentially. [2] The parties referred this grievance to mediation/arbitration in accordance with Article 22.16 of the collective agreement. At the outset of the hearing the parties agreed that I had the jurisdiction to deal with this matter. They asked that I issue a decision without precedent or prejudice, and without written reasons in accord with the policy of the parties for expedited hearings under Article 22.16. [3] Having carefully considered the submissions of the parties, as well as the jurisprudence of the Board, I hereby deny this grievance. th Dated at Toronto this 5 day of January 2010. Deborah J.D. Leighton, Vice-Chair