HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001-0534.Hunt et al.10-05-11 Decision
Commission de Commission de
Crown Employeess
Grievance Grievance
règlement des griefs règlement des griefs
Settlement Board Settlement Board
des employés de la des employés de la
Couronne Couronne
Suite 600 Suite 600 Bureau 600 Bureau 600
180 Dundas St. West 180 Dundas St. West 180, rue Dundas Ouest 180, rue Dundas Ouest
Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z8 Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z8 Toronto (Ontario) M5G 1Z8 Toronto (Ontario) M5G 1Z8
Tel. (416) 326-1388 Tel. (416) 326-1388 Tél. : (416) 326-1388 Tél. : (416) 326-1388
Fax (416) 326-1396 Fax (416) 326-1396 Téléc. : (416) 326-1396 Téléc. : (416) 326-1396
GSB#2001-0534, 2003-2944, 2008-3397 GSB#2001-0534, 2003-2944, 2008-3397
UNION#2001-0551-0001, 2003-0999-0023, 2008-0526-0018 UNION#2001-0551-0001, 2003-0999-0023, 2008-0526-0018
IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION
UUnnddeerr
THE CROWN EMPLOYEES COLLECTHE CROWN EMPLOYEES COLLECTIVE BARGAINING ACT TIVE BARGAINING ACT
BBeeffoorree
THE GRIEVANCE SETTLEMENT BOARD THE GRIEVANCE SETTLEMENT BOARD
BETWEENBETWEEN
Ontario Public Service Employees Union
èÏÔÎÏ
(Hunt et al)
- and -
The Crown in Right of Ontario
Employer
(Ministry of Attorney General)
BEFORERandi H. Abramsky Vice-Chair
FOR THE UNIONTim Hannigan
Ryder Wright Blair & Holmes, LLP
Barristers and Solicitors
FOR THE EMPLOYERLen Hatzis
Ministry of Government Services
Counsel
TELECONFERENCE
April 22, 2010.
.
- 2 -
DECISION
[1]On April 22, 2010, a conference call as held, at which the Union requested an extension
of time until May 17, 2010 to provide the particulars ordered in the Board?s decision of
March 11, 2010.
[2]Counsel for the Union stated that the Union was diligently working on the particulars, but
that, given the number of employees involved (in excess of 400), the task was time-
consuming and difficult. The Employer opposed the request.
[3]As stated during the conference call, the Union?s request for the extension is granted.
The Union provided valid reasons for its request. As noted in paragraph 3 of the Board?s
March 11, 2010 decision, the original time frame provided a ?relatively brief timeline for
compliance.?
[4]The Union is to make its best efforts to complete the required particulars by May 17,
2010.
[5]The hearing in this matter will continue on June 2, 2010.
th
Dated at Toronto this 11 day of May 2010.
Randi H. Abramsky, Vice-Chair