Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004-2561.Moore.10-11-03 Decision Commission de Crown Employees Grievance UqJOHPHQWGHV Settlement Board griefs GHVHPSOR\pVGHOD Couronne Suite 600 180 Dundas St. West Bureau 600 Toronto, Ontario M5G 180, rue Dundas Ouest 1Z8 Toronto (Ontario) M5G Tel. (416) 326-1388 1Z8 Fax (416) 326-1396 7pO   7pOpF   GSB#2004-2561, 2004-2562, 2004-2563 UNION#2004-0122-0016, 2004-0122-0017, 2004-0122-0018 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION Under THE CROWN EMPLOYEES COLLECTIVE BARGAINING ACT Before THE GRIEVANCE SETTLEMENT BOARD BETWEEN Ontario Public Service Employees Union (Moore/Denomme/Holland) Union - and - The Crown in Right of Ontario (Ministry of Children and Youth Services) Employer BEFOREVice-Chair Felicity D. Briggs FOR THE UNION Anastasios Zafiriadis Ontario Public Service Employees Union Grievance Officer FOR THE EMPLOYER Nicholas Sapp Ministry of Government Services Employee Relations Division Employee Relations Adviser HEARINGJune 4, 2010. - 2 - Decision [1]Kim Moore, Mark Denomme and Joanne Holland are Youth Services Officers with the Ministry of Child and Youth Services. In June of 2004, each filed a grievance VWDWLQJ³,JULHYHWKDWWKHEmployer has not properly compensated me on my classified status retroactive to July 31, 2003. [2]Each of the grievors were involved in a Rollover from unclassified to classified status that took place in the Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services. According to the agreement between the parties certain unclassified employees were to have their status altered to classified as of July 31, 2003. The Rollovers did not take place until April of 2004. [3]These grievances were filed when the grievors were Correctional Officers working in the Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services. For that reason, the parties agreHGWRVHQGWKLVPDWWHUWRWKH³7UDQVLWLRQ7DEOH´IRUGLVSRVLWLRQ$V LVWKHFDVHZLWKRWKHU³7UDQVLWLRQ´PDWWHUVthis decision has no precedential value. [4]At the hearing I was provided with all of the facts and various documents including payroll records. [5]After considering the facts and submissions I am of the view that there has been no violation of the Collective Agreement and therefore the grievances are dismissed. rd Dated at Toronto this 3 day of November 2010. Felicity D. Briggs, Vice-Chair