HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009-2922.Sindall.10-11-05 DecisionCommission de
Crown Employees
Grievance
UqJOHPHQWGHVJULHIV
Settlement Board
GHVHPSOR\pVGHOD
Couronne
Suite 600 Bureau 600
180 Dundas St. West 180, rue Dundas Ouest
Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z8 Toronto (Ontario) M5G 1Z8
Tel. (416) 326-1388 7pO
Fax (416) 326-1396 7pOpF
GSB#2009-2922, 2009-2923
UNION#2009-0248-0050, 2009-0248-0051
IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION
Under
THE CROWN EMPLOYEES COLLECTIVE BARGAINING ACT
Before
THE GRIEVANCE SETTLEMENT BOARD
BETWEEN
Ontario Public Service Employees Union
(Sindall)
Union
- and -
The Crown in Right of Ontario
(Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services)
Employer
BEFOREVice-Chair
M.B. Keller
FOR THE UNION
Anastasios Zafiriadis & Scott Andrews
Ontario Public Service Employees Union
Grievance Officers
FOR THE EMPLOYER
Greg Gledhill
Ministry of Government Services
Employee Relations Division
Staff Relations Officer
HEARINGApril 27, 2010.
- 2 -
Decision
[1]The parties have agreed to an Expedited Mediation-Arbitration Protocol. It is not
necessary to reproduce the entire Protocol here. Suffice it to say that the parties have agreed to a
³7UXH0HGLDWLRQ$UELWUDWLRQ´SURFHVVZKHUHLQeach provides the Vice-Chair with submissions,
which include the facts and authorities each relies upon. This decision is issued in accordance
with the Protocol and with Article 22.16 of the collective agreement, and is without prejudice or
precedent.
[2]At a med-arb session at HWDC, the Vice-Chair dealt with a number of grievances filed
by the union on behalf of Mr. Sindall. At the conclusion of the session, decisions were required
to deal with some of them. The Vice-Chair erred in not associating his decision with the correct
files. The Board issued the decision with the wrong files associated, as drafted by the Vice-
Chair. This decision confirms the earlier one, but lists the correct file numbers.
[3]For the purposes of clarity, the Vice-Chair considered the submissions of the parties
when drafting his earlier decision. There is no need to re-visit the matter as the error by the
Vice-Chair was clerical only and the only reason there is a need to deal with this matter at all is
to correct that clerical error.
[4]To reiterate the finding in the earlier decision, the grievances are dismissed.
th
Dated at Toronto this 5 day of November 2010.
M.B. Keller, Vice-Chair