Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2022-8631.Bahadur.24-06-07 Decision Crown Employees Grievance Settlement Board Suite 600 180 Dundas St. West Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z8 Tel. (416) 326-1388 Commission de règlement des griefs des employés de la Couronne Bureau 600 180, rue Dundas Ouest Toronto (Ontario) M5G 1Z8 Tél. : (416) 326-1388 GSB# 2022-8631 UNION# 2022-0526-0028 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION Under THE CROWN EMPLOYEES COLLECTIVE BARGAINING ACT Before THE GRIEVANCE SETTLEMENT BOARD BETWEEN Ontario Public Service Employees Union (Bahadur) Union - and - The Crown in Right of Ontario (Ministry of the Attorney General) Employer BEFORE Ian Anderson Arbitrator FOR THE UNION Robin Lostracco Ontario Public Service Employees Union Senior Grievance Officer FOR THE EMPLOYER Maria-Kristina Ascenzi Treasury Board Secretariat Labour Practice Group Counsel HEARING May 15, 2024 -2 - Decision [1] Further to case management directions given during a conference call with the parties’ representatives on March 25, 2024, by letter dated April 15, 2024 the Employer provided the Union with an itemized list of documents which it objects producing in whole or in part with a brief statement of the basis of its objections. The Union maintains its request for the documents in question. A conference call was held on May 15, 2024 to hear the parties’ submissions with respect to the disputed documents. [2] Having considered the representations of the parties, I make the following orders with respect to the disputed documents: (i) The Employer is ordered to produce the documents to the Union. With the exception of the documents specifically described below, the documents are to be produced to the Union in an unredacted form. (ii) The Union is directed not to provide copies of the disputed documents to the Grievor. (iii) Notwithstanding (ii), the Union may show the disputed documents to the Grievor for the purposes of preparing for and conducting the arbitration hearing, provided that the Grievor is not permitted to in any way retain or make a copy of any of the disputed documents shown to her. (iv) The documents produced may be used for the purposes of the arbitration hearing in this matter but not for any other purpose. (v) The Employer seeks to redact certain information from the documents listed below. It is not apparent at this time that the information in question is arguably relevant. Accordingly, the Employer may redact the information in question, without prejudice to the Union’s right to request that some or all of the information be unredacted should it become apparent in the course of the proceedings that it is arguably relevant. The documents and redactions which may be made in accordance with this direction are as follows: (a) March 31, 2022 12:30 PM email from Andrew Pilla, Crown Attorney: the names referenced in the email may remain redacted. (b) March 31, 2022 2:03 PM email from Andrew Pilla, Crown Attorney; the text of the email may remain redacted. -3 - (c) April 1, 2022, 12:15 PM email from “redacted” at Thunder Bay Police to Sona Advani: the name of the sender of the email may remain redacted. Dated at Toronto, Ontario this 7th day of June 2024. “Ian Anderson” Ian Anderson, Arbitrator