HomeMy WebLinkAbout1978-0071.Tomasini.78-07-06CROWN
Between:
iN ~TtiE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATiON
Before:
Under The
EMPLOYEES.COLLECTIVE BARGAINING ACT
i32fore
THE GRIEVANCE SETTLEMENT BOARD
Mr. L. Tomasini T!ie Grievor
and
Ministry of 'Transportaticn and The Employer
Communications
Professor i. W. Adams - Chairman
Mrs. M. Gibb - Member
Mr. ii. Simcn - Member
For the Grievor
Mrs. L. Stevens, Grievance Officer
Ontario Public Service Employees Union
1901 Yange Strfet
Toronto, Ontario
For the Employer
Hearing
Mr. N. il. Pettifor, Staff Relations Supervisor
Personnel Branch
Ministry of Transportation & Communications
Downsview, Cntario
June Znd, 1978
Suite 2100~, 18~3 3undas St. Nest, Toronto, Ontario
i +-. -3
-2 -
In this case, the grievor, Mr. Tomasini,
requests compensation for time spent travelling on a regular day
off in accord with Article 23. Article 23 provides:
ARTICLE 23 - TIME CREDITS WHILETFAVELLING
23.1 Employees shall be credited with all
time spent in travelling outside of
working hours when authorized by the Ministry.
23.2 When travel is by public carrier, time
will be credited from one (1) hour be-
fore the scheduled time of departure of the
carrier until one (1) hour after the actual
arrival of the carrier at the destination.
23.3 When travel is by automobile and the
employee travels directly from his
home or place of employment, time will be cred-
ited from the assigned hour of departure until
he reaches his destination and from the assig"ed
hour of departure from the destination until he
reaches his home or place of employment.
23.4 When sleeping accommodation is provided,
the hours between eleven 111:OO) p.m.
and .the regular starting time of the employee
shall not be credited.
23.5 When a" employee is required to travel on
his regular day off or a holiday listed
in Article 9 of the Employee Benefits Agreemnt,
he shall be credited with a minimum of four (4)
hours.
23.6 All travelling time shall be paid at the
employee's basic hourly rate or where
mutually agreed, by compensating leave.
Mr. Tomasini is employed as a Municipal Super-
visor, a position allocated to the class of Technician 1, Mu-
nicipal Engineering, in the Bancroft District of the Ministry of
Transportation and Coaanunications. His job duties include
attending meetings at various municipal offices responsible for
highway constructionand/or maintenance to explain Ministry
policy or procedures or to provide technical assistance. To
attend those meetings, he is required to'travel;
On October 8, 1977, a Saturday, land therefore
-3-
a scheduled day off for the grievor, Mr. Tomasini attended a
meeting of the McKenzie Lake and Madawaska Local Roads Board.
This assignment required him to travel for a total of three
hours and to be in attendance at the meeting for four and one-
half~ hours. The, dispute between the parties is in respect
of the compensation to which Mr. Tomasini is.entitled for the
duties carried out on this date.
The grievor claims he is entitled
under Articles 23.5 and 23.6 to payment for a minimum of four
hours, plus four and one-half hours of compensating time off
under Article 19.6 of the same agreement. Article 19.6 pro-
vides:
19.6 Notwithstanding anything in Article
19, employees who are in classifications
assigned to, Schedule 6, who are required to work
on their day off or on a holiday included in
Article 9 of the Employee Benefits Agreement,
shall receive equivalent tire off.
1.t is the .position of the Ministry that Mr.
Tomasini is occupying a position which is allocated to the class
of Technician 1, Municipal Engineering, which class is alloca-
ted to Schedule 6, to which Article 7.3 of the Working Condi-
tions Agreement applies. This article specifies that the
hours of work for these employees shall be a minimum of thirty-
six and one-quarter hours per week, with no maximum set. Because
there are no fixed hours per week to be worked by these employees
and because their salary rates are set in the collective ag-
reement in terms of weekly and annual amounts, the Ministry
contends that there is no computation possible of the "basic
hourly rate" referred to in Article 23.6 of the Working Condi-
tions Agreement. Thus, the Ministry has taken the position
that the grievor is entitled only to compensation for seven and
one-half hours under Article 19.6.
Alternatively, the Ministry states the
grievor was performing duties on this occasion which were
identical to those performed on a normal work day, including
-4 -
the time spent travelling. Accordingly, all the time spent
on Ministry business on the occasion in-question was work on
a day off, and therefore subject to compensation only in accord-
ance with Article 19.6.
A summary of the grievor's duties and re-.
sponsibilities were also introduced into evidence and they'.'
read:
3. SUMMARY OF DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES - Under
the direct supervision of the Assistant
to the Municipal Engineer, performs such duties
as:
1. Assists in the office administration by:
- assisting in checking and processing nor-
mal municipal allotments and road programs,
requests for supplementary allotments,
interim and annual returns for compliance
with regulations and arithmetical correct-
ions.
- reviewing, as directed, requests for des-
ignation of development roads and connect-
ing link construction projects; preparing
recomndations for approval of municipal
engineer.
- assisting municipalities in the preparation
of equipment specifications.
- reviewing proposals for equipment storage
building construction and making recommend-
ations to supervisor.
- assisting in checking contract documents,
drawings, progress reports, etc., pertain-
ing to development roads, consultant con-
tracts, payment certificates, consultant
accou"ts, and preparing money requests on
forms D.4, D.4.S and BA.3 for work orders.
-5 -
- checking, as directed, design cri-
teria to comply with standards and
also ctimplying with mOst recent traf-
fic count*.
40%
- assisting, as directed, in organizing
local roads boards by attendiny meetings
and providing all relevant information.
- obtaining notes and estimates relative
to local roads boards, statute labour
boards and submitting to supervisor for
approval.
- answering correspondence, as directed by
supervisor, to various municipalities,
boards, consultants, etc.
- assisting in the updating of mileage
charts on township roads in municipali-
ties throughout the District.
- providing information to various author-
ities by telephone.
- assisting in reviewing final tender awards
submitted by municipalities for subsidy
eligibility.
- attending meetings at various municipal
offices to explain Ministry policy or'pro-
cedures, or providing technical assistance.
- recommending staff requirements for season-
al jobs.
- other related 'duties as assigned.
2. As assigned by supervisor carries out field
duties such as:
- viewing or inspecting on site, construct-
ion for compliance to standards (road
construction, bridges, culverts. surfac-
ing, fencing, etc.).
-conducting road inspection with municipal
representatives and viewing conditions;
recoimnending solutions and proposals to
municipal representatives and supervisor.
- supervising M.T.C. survey work on munici-
pal roads.
- supervising day labour and statute labour
groups (not supervised by Statute Labour
Boards) engaged in~municipal work, day
labour projects, etc.
- arranging day labous assignments of foremen
as rec&wended by supervisor.
- recommending hiring of seasonal staff.
50% - arranging for the hiring of seasonal staff
and equipment for day labour projects.
- ensuring that safety regulations and pro-
visions are complied with.
- ensuring that concrete, asphalt and ayyre-
gate samples are provided and that miter-
ials meet M.T.C. standards.
I
- 6 -
- instructing municipal employees
in the techniques of taking tests
and samples, and the administrative
methods for gravel and surface
treatment contracts.
- assisting others in establishing de-
sign criteria by making on-site visits.
-taking photographs of existing conditions
of roads, etc.
- checking elevations, profiles and cross-
sections in the field.
- inspecting projects throughout construct-
ion'and upon completion.
- other related duties as assigned.
3. Supervises activities of day labour foremen by:
- reviewing and approving work assignments
and duties.
10%
-providing technical guidace and resolv-
ing problems.
- approving time sheets and checking ex-
penses.
- acting for supervisor during his absence.
- updating personal knowledge by reading
all related circulars, publications, and
attending or taking prescribed courses,
reading publications and extracting
advertisements.
- as assigned.
The Board is of the opinion that the grievance
must succeed. The wording of the collective agreement is quite
specific, and makes, no exception for Schedule 6 employees. When
an employee is required to travel on his regular day off, and
the grievor was so required, he is to be credited with a min-
imum of fourhours. The fact that 23.1 may have no application
to Schedule 6 employees who are required to travel on a regular
working day because there is no maximum number of weekly hours
that applies to them is no reason to conclude that the entire ar-
ticle has no application to them. Similarly, the fact that there
is some difficulty in making a compilation under Article 23.6 is
an insufficient reason for concluding that no compilation can be
made. In our view, the parties should be able to agree to a
reasonable period of work time preceding the regular day off (i.e. a
monthly) providing .his representationon which travel occurs for
the purposes of calculating the employee's average number of
weekly hours from which a compilation under Article 23.6 can be
made. Moreover, a review of the grievor's duties and responsi-
bilities convinces us that he is not employed to drive as
I
-?-
would be a driver but rather, such travelling as occurred on,
October 8, 1977 wasp incidental to his primary job duties and well
within the kind of travel intended by Article 23. For example,
Article 23.3 refers to travel aimed at taking the employee to a
"destination", where presumably, his principal job duties would
be exercised. This is exactly the kind of travel undertaken by
the,grievor on October 8, 1977. The grievor in "Marcotte" was
not engaged in responsibility-free travel but was engaged in
the performance of a specific job duty.
For all of these reasons, the grievor is upheld
and the Ministry is directed to compensate the grievor as requested.
The Board retains jurisdiction to entertain and resolve any diffi-
culties with respect to the necessary computation should the
parties be unable to agree on an appropriate procedure.
DATED at Toronto this '6th day of July 1978.
G. W. Adams Chairman
M. Gibb Member
H. Simon Member