Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2023-00429.Hebert.24-07-23 Decision Crown Employees Grievance Settlement Board Suite 600 180 Dundas St. West Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z8 Tel. (416) 326-1388 Commission de règlement des griefs des employés de la Couronne Bureau 600 180, rue Dundas Ouest Toronto (Ontario) M5G 1Z8 Tél. : (416) 326-1388 GSB# 2023-00429 UNION# 2023-0737-0003 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION Under THE CROWN EMPLOYEES COLLECTIVE BARGAINING ACT Before THE GRIEVANCE SETTLEMENT BOARD BETWEEN Ontario Public Service Employees Union (Hebert) Union - and - The Crown in Right of Ontario (Ministry of the Solicitor General) Employer BEFORE Brian McLean Arbitrator FOR THE UNION Robert Healey Ryder Wright Holmes Bryden Nam LLP Counsel FOR THE EMPLOYER Katie Ayers Treasury Board Secretariat Legal Services Branch Counsel HEARING July 19, 2024 -2 - Decision [1] This is a discharge grievance. The parties appeared at the Board on July 19, 2024, but were unable to commence the hearing because the Employer was unable to provide full production to the Union. [2] The Employer intends to rely on a number of video recordings as part of its case. In addition, the Union seeks production of certain video recordings. However, certain of these recordings were not produced by the Employer prior to July 19. The Employer explained that its failure to produce the videos was occasioned by technical difficulties which it was unable to resolve. In short, the Employer could watch the videos on its security system but is unable to transfer them to a form which the Union (or I) can view on our own computers. [3] The Union argues that the Employer's position is unacceptable. While the Employer strenuously resisted the Union’s position, it was obvious to me that the Employer had not addressed the issue with the seriousness it deserves. For example, it relied on its workplace representatives to resolve the problem rather than seek the assistance of a tech expert or someone from the company that created or supplied the camera/recording equipment. [4] Rather than determine the Union's motions at this point, I find it appropriate to give the Employer more time to resolve the issue. Accordingly, the Employer shall have until September 30, 2024 to produce to the Union the videos at issue and any other documents it intends to rely on or which the Union has sought production of. [5] If the Employer does not produce the required videos and materials I shall convene a conference call to determine next steps including whether the Employer should be permitted to rely on the events which were recorded on the videos at issue. Dated at Toronto, Ontario this 23rd day of July 2024. “Brian McLean” Brian McLean, Arbitrator