Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012-0185.Harrison.15-10-29.DecisionCrown Employees Grievance Settlement Board Suite 600 180 Dundas St. West Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z8 Tel. (416) 326-1388 Fax (416) 326-1396 Commission de règlement des griefs des employés de la Couronne Bureau 600 180, rue Dundas Ouest Toronto (Ontario) M5G 1Z8 Tél. : (416) 326-1388 Téléc. : (416) 326-1396 GSB#2012-0185 UNION#2010-0252-0012 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION Under THE CROWN EMPLOYEES COLLECTIVE BARGAINING ACT Before THE GRIEVANCE SETTLEMENT BOARD BETWEEN Ontario Public Service Employees Union (Harrison) Union - and - The Crown in Right of Ontario (Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services) Employer BEFORE Brian P. Sheehan Vice-Chair FOR THE UNION Nick Mustari Ontario Public Service Employees Union Grievance Officer FOR THE EMPLOYER Greg Gledhill Treasury Board Secretariat Centre for Employee Relations Employee Relations Advisor HEARING October 22, 2015 - 2 - Decision [1] The Employer and the Union at the Niagara Detention Centre agreed to participate in the Expedited Mediation/Arbitration process in accordance with the negotiated Protocol. It is not necessary to reproduce the entire Protocol. Suffice to say, that the parties have agreed to a True Mediation/Arbitration process wherein each party provides the Vice-Chair with their submissions setting out the facts and the authorities they respectively will rely upon. This decision is issued in accordance with the Protocol and with Article 22.16 of the collective agreement; and it is without prejudice or precedent. [2] The grievor, at the time of the incident that gave rise to the grievance, was a Food Services Officer. [3] On August 4, 2010, the grievor was supervising work performed by inmates in the kitchen. She climbed onto a two-step ladder in an effort to fix or adjust a fan. The grievor fell from the ladder; and because of the fall, broke her wrist. [4] The grievor received benefits pursuant to the provisions of the Workplace Safety and Insurance Act (WSIA) with respect to her workplace accident. [5] The grievor subsequently discovered there was a “household use only” sticker on the kitchen ladder from which she fell. [6] The Employer asserted that the grievor had been previously advised, prior to the August 4, 2010 incident, not to try to fix or adjust the fan in question because of the physical restrictions associated with her workplace accommodation. [7] The Employer additionally submitted that the referral to arbitration was untimely and on that basis the grievance should be dismissed. [8] The gist of the grievance is that the Employer allegedly breached its obligations under the Occupational Health and Safety Act (OHSA) by requiring employees to use an improper and unsafe piece of equipment – the two-step “household” ladder. The remedy sought is that the Employer compensate the grievor the difference between monies she received as benefits under the WSIA and her normal wages. - 3 - [9] Pursuant to the provisions of the WSIA, an employee who is entitled to receive benefits, pursuant to the provisions of the WSIA, is precluded from bringing an action, or seeking additional relief from his/her employer, over and above the employee’s entitlement to benefits under that Act. Specifically, Section 26 (2) of the WSIA stipulates: 26 (2) Entitlement to benefits under the insurance plan is in lieu of all rights of action (statutory or otherwise) that a worker, a worker’s survivor or a worker’s spouse, child or dependant has or may have against the worker’s employer or an executive officer of the employer for or by reason of an accident happening to the worker or an occupational disease contracted by the worker while in the employment of the employer. (emphasis added) [10] As confirmed in Ontario Public Services Employees Union (Monk et al) and the Crown in Right of Ontario (Community Safety and Correctional Services and Ministry of Children and Youth Services) GSB #1995-1694 (Gray) Section 26 (2) of the WSIA constitutes the statutory codification of the “historic trade-off” of workers giving up the right to bring an action in the courts against employers for negligence in exchange for a statutory “no fault” benefits scheme with respect to workplace injuries or illnesses. In particular, Vice-Chair Gray, in that decision, offered the following comments as to the “historic trade-off”: Early in the twentieth century, Ontario (and other jurisdictions) enacted legislation to provide for no-fault compensation of workers for workplace injuries, out of a compensation scheme funded by mandatory employer contributions. Such legislation involves what is commonly described as a “historic trade-off.” The right of workers to take legal proceedings against their employers to recover compensation for workplace injuries was extinguished and replaced with a right to compensation that did not depend on the employer’s being solvent or proven to be “at fault,” and was not affected by questions of their own voluntary assumption of risk or contributory negligence. In turn, employers were protected from liability to their employees for workplace injuries, in return for their mandatory contributions to the compensation fund. As is typical in such legislation, the Ontario legislation created an administrative agency with exclusive jurisdiction to administer the fund, assess entitlement to - 4 - benefits and determine the precise boundaries of the “historic trade- off,” removing those questions from consideration by courts. [11] In accordance with the decision in OPSEU (Monk et al), Section 26 (2) of the WSIA precludes the GSB from awarding the type of relief sought by the grievor, even if it was concluded that the Employer had, in some manner, breached the provisions of the OHSA with respect to the grievor’s workplace accident. [12] Prohibited from being able to award the relief sought, there is no need to address the grievor’s assertion that there was a breach of the provisions of the OHSA by the Employer; accordingly, the grievance is, hereby, dismissed. Dated at Toronto this 29th day of October 2015. Brian P. Sheehan, Vice-Chair