HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-1065.Rutledge.91-10-18
¡¡. :-
'q ONTARIO EMPLOYÉS DE LA COURONNE
CAOWN EMPLOYEES DE L'ONTAR¡O
1111 GRIEVANCE COMMISSION DE
~
SETTLEMENT REGLEMENT
BOARD DES GRIEFS
180 DUNDAS STREET WEST, SUITE 2100, TORONTO, ONTARIO. M5G lZ8 TELEPHONEIT£ÉLÊPHONE' (416) 326-1388
180, RUE DUNDAS OUEST, BUREAU 2100, TORONTO (ONTARIO), MSG lZ8 FACSiMiLEITÊLÉCOPIE: (416) 326-1396
1065/90
.
:IN THB HATTBR OJ' AN' ARBI:TRAT:ION
UDder
THB CROWN BKPLOYBBS COLLECTIVE BARGAINING ACT
Before
THE GRIEVANCB SBTTLEMENT BOARD
BBTWBEN
OPSEU (Rutledge)
Grievor
- and -
The Crown in Right of Ontario
(Ministry of Transportation)
Employer
BEFORE: M. Watters Vice-Chairperson
J. Carruthers Member
M. O'Toole Member
FOR THB R. Stephenson
GRIEVOR Counsel
Gowling, Strathy & Henderson
Barristers & solicitors
FOR THE A. Rae
EMPLOYER Counsel
Winkler, Filion &I Wakely
Barristers & Solicitors
HE~RI~G February 22, 1991
July 11, 1991
.
.
!\;
~'
The grievor is employed as the sole Garage Attendant at the
Ministry's District Garage in Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario. He has
worked in that capacity since '1986. Thl3: grievor claimed that he
1S improperly classified as a Garage Attendant. The Union
requested a Berrv order on his behalf. The grievor was the sole
witness called on behalf of the Union. The Employer elected
against the calling of evidence.
The District Garage is a single story structure which
:¡-
,
~
from an earlier 1986 job description in, three (3 ) respects. I
I
Firstly, it confirms that the grievor 1S no longer required to
clean the washroom and lunchroom areas. Secondly, it "includes a
reference to grass cutting and general yard duties. Lastly, it
notes that the grievor operatès various pieces of equipment in
the performance of his duties. Both specifications list the
duties and responsibilities of the Garage Attendant under the
following headings: ( i ) Servicing of Ministry equipment; ( i i)
Maintaining general cleanliness of the District Garage (and yard
in the case of the most recent document); (iii) Assisting the
mechanic; and ( i v) Assisting the Equipment Control Clerk. The
grievor has not assisted the Equipment Control Clerk Slnce 1989.
With this exception, we are satisfied from the evidence that he
performs the bulk of the duties listed under the first three ( 3 )
headings of the amended job description.
The grievor testified that he performs additional work which
is not described in the position specification. Numerous
.
examples were provided of extra work reìating to the servicing of
equipment and to the provision of assistance to the mechanics.
In our judgment, this ,evidence does not need to be reproduced as
such additional work clearly falls within the scope of the class
standards. We elect, rather, to restrict our consideration to
those responsibilities which relate to the appropriateness of the
grievor's present classification. These may be grouped under the
following headings: ( i ) Snow removal and lawn mowing; ( ; i ) Yard
Maintenance; (iiì) Storage; ,and ( i v ) Steam cleaning.
2
I
!,
I,
,
The grievor testified that he removes snow from the complex
in the winter months. He stated that this task is performed more
than once per week. He estimated that it takes approximately
eight (8 ) hours to clear the yard after a light storm. We accE=pt
that approximately thirty (30) working days are taken up by this
task in the period December to April in any given year.
The grievor advised that he takes care of the 1 awns adjace:¡nt
to the garage. He cuts the grass once every two ( 2 ) weeks in t.he
Spring and once per month in the Fall. This task is assigned t.o
a student in the summer period. Each cut takes approximately six
( 6 ) to eight (8) hours. These figures translate to about eight
(8 ) days per year spent on this activity. Additionally, on two
(2) or three (3) occasions each year~ the grievor cuts hay in the
field and ditches surrounding the Garage property. He estimatHd
that this work takes ten ( 10) hours to complete on each occasion.
The grievor utilizes the following equipment in this work: hay
mower, riding lawnmower, push mower, whipper snipper, and weed
, eater. He also effects repairs to this equipment on an as-needed
basis.
The grievor provided a substantial amount of evidence
relating to the performance of yard maintenance. These effort~;
included the following:
( i ) the grievor spent between one (1) and two (2) weeks
"building up" the storage yard. Scrap and garbage was removed
3
:.-<!
\.,
.
from the site and gravel was hauled in and levelled. The grievor
used a dump truck, loader, grader, bull-dozer, fork lift and boom
t r,u c k in this process. He was assisted by an Equipment Operator
and a s,tudent.
( i i ) the,grievor repaired the·fence surrounding the yard on two
( 2 ) occaSlons. He also disassembled part of same when he bu i 1 t
up the storage yard.
(iii) each year the, grievor spends one ( 1 ) day fixing the
curbs in the parking lot which have been'damaged during snow
remova 1 . The fork, 1 i ft, pry bars and sledge hammer are used to
complete this work.
(iv) the, grievor also fi 1 15 in the pot holes in the yard. This
is done three ( 3 ) to four (4) times each year. Loaders, graders
.
and the fork lift are employed in the completion of this task.
A considerable amount of the grievor's time is devoted to
the storage of equipment in the yard. Sanders, sander bodies,
dump bodies, wings, plqws, and wing standards are stored in that
area. The grievor has constructed special racks and platforms
for the s~orage of many of these items. The fork lift is used
extensively in this process. From time to, time, the grievor 1S
also required to use the hiab crane. In addition to the above,
the grievor stores mini-trailers, packers, rollers, t rl ax ,1 e
trailers, compressors, roadsweepers and snow blowers in the yard.
The grievor also moves these items from the yard into the garage
for storage or servicing when that 1S required. He conceded that
4
.
,
.
the majority of his work with all of this equipment is related to
the moving and storage of same.
The grievor spends a substantial amount of time working w~th
a high pressure steam generatòr. This piece of equipment, which
is fired by natural gas) emits boiling water and steam under
significant pressure. Under the direction of the mechanics, the
grievor uses U)e dev i ce to remove grease) oi 1 and dirt from the
frame) ball-joints, rear ends, springs, steering mechanism)
radiators, motors, and transmissions of vehicles and equipment so
that the mechanic may effectively work on same. The steam
generator is also used to remove unwanted material, such as salt)
from the sander bodies and dump bodies. This piece of equipment
is not'used on the exterior body of vehicles. A high pressure
washer) which sprays soap and water) is used for that purpose as
wel1 as to clean surfaces such as the garage floor. When the
grievor uses the steam generator, he wears a rain-suit, hood,
mask, rubber g,l aves, and boots to protect himself from the
scalding water. From time to time, the grievor has serviced and
repaired þoth the steam generator and the high pressure washer.
It was his evidence that approximately seven ( 7 ) hours a week i :3
spent using the former equipment. The grievor could not be
precise as to the amount of time expended on the use of the high
pressure washer. He did note that more time is devoted to
cleaning in the winter season.
S
.
',.
""
,
In cross-examination, the grievor stated that eighty percent
(80%) to eighty-five percent (85%) of his time is spent steam
cleaning, operating the fork lift, removing snow. cleaning the
garage and maintaining the yard. He considered the moving of
equipment for storage purposes to fall within the heading of yard
maintenance. The grievor further testified that bètween thirty
percent (30%) and forty percent (40%) of his time is spent on
snow removal and yard maintenance. It, is somewhat unclear as to
whether this approximation was based on the total amount of time
,
spent on his job or on the time devoted to the five ( 5 ) tasks
mentioned above. The grievor testified that building maintenance
and assistance to the mechanic fell within the remaining fifteen
percent (15%). It is apparent to the Board that his estimates of
time spent are not exact. Indeed, they conflict with his
evidence in chief to the effect that the first three ( 3 ) headings
on the position specification occupied thirty-five percent (35%) ,
thirty--five percent (35%) and thirty percent (30%) of his time,
respectively. Nevertheless, having heard and considered all of
the grievor's evidence, we t h ink it more likely than not that
somewhere. in excess of twenty-fi ve percent (25%) of his time 1 s
devoted to snow removal lawn mowing, yard maintenance and
storage.
It was the position of the Union that a number of'core
duties performed by the gr i evor fa 11 outside of the, class
standar·ds. Counsel submitted that these "substantial and glaring
omissions" result from the fact that the standards are not
6
I
~
~
des 'j gned to apply to a facility such as the District Garage and
adjacent yard. He suggested, t-ather, that they are intended to I
I
cover persons working indoors ' ' " service station"
1 n a gara!3e or
like setting. Counsel noted that ~he Class Definition refers to
the performance of unskilled manual work "i n a large government
garage" . He further emphasized that the types of duties
contained within the class standards would normally be performed
in a garage. It was the submission of counsel that the grievor's
workplace could not be so restricted. Indeed, he referred to the
position specification which differentiates between the garage
and the yard. As noted earlier, that document specifically
mentions certain duties and responsibilities which must be done
1n the yard. Reference was made ~o the grievor's estimate that
yard maintenance, as broadly defined, and snow removal constitute
between thirty percent (30%) and forty-percent (40%) of the job.
From counsel's perspective, these are inherently outdoor
activities which, consequently, fall outside of the scope of the
class standards.
Counsel for the Union reviewed the various tasks performed
by the grievor in the area of yard maintenance. As stated above,
these include the storage of equipment (sander bodies, dump
bodies, plows, wing standards etc. };construction of storage
pìatforms and racks; lawn and hay mowing; maintenance of asphalt
and pothoìe repair; fence repair and maintenance; and levelling
of the storage yard. It was argued that none of the
7
..
~
aforementioned activities are contemplated ln the class
standards. We were urged to conclude that this was because the
standards are de~igned for a "different job".
The Union further submitted that the kind of equipment and
tools used by the grievor to perform his duties are not
contemplated by the class standards. Reference was made In this
regard to the use of the lawnmower. chainsaw, grader, roller,
packer and fork 1'1 ft. Counsel also argued that the use of the
steam cleaner does not fall within the words "wash and polish
vehicles" as found in the first paragraph under 'Characteristic
Duties' . It was noted that the high pressure washer is employed
for that task.
The Union relied on the following awards in support of its
position: Beach, 816/86 (Fisher) and Cardno et a1., 530/88 et
a 1 . (Stewart) .
In Beach. the grievor who was classified as an E'l ectron i cs
TeChnician clearly performed the type of duties envisaged by the
class standards. He also, however. performed other significant
duties not covered by the standards. These related to design and
modification of existing equipment, purchasing, ,and external
contacts. The first of thöse duties occupied five percent (5%)
to ten per'cent (10%) of the grievor's time. rn finding that the
grievor was wrongly classified, the Board stated:
8
~
¡
"The mere fact that the dut i es as contemp 1 ated by,
the Class Standard are in fact performed by th~
grievor does not in itself mean that the Class
Standard is appropriate where the evidence reveals
that there are further core duties also performed
by the grievor which are not covered by the Class
Standard. " (page 2)
In 9ardno, ten percent ( 10%) òf thegr iEwor' s duties fe 11 outside
of the class standards. This work related to certain design and
modification tasks performed by Electrical Maintenance
Technicians. The discrepancy formed the basis for a Berry order.
Counsel fo~ the Union asked that we take a similar approach
to the resolution of the instant dispute. He argued that the ten
percent (10%) threshold was exceeded by a substantial marg1n 1n
this case.
In response, it was the position of the Employer that the
grievor's core duties are caught by the class standards. It was
submitted that all of the grievor's responsibilities could be
described as unskilled manual labour in a large Government
garage. Counsel for the Employer argued that the grievor
performs ~he bulk of the duties referred to in the first three
(3} paragraphs under 'Characteristic Duties'. She alsb asserted
that yard maintenance and snow removal fall within the phrase
.. ,performed assigned maintenance tasks on the premises" found in
the class standards. Counsel suggested that the performance of
these duties should not be restricted to the garage itself, as
claimed by the Union. In th i s I~espect I it was argued that
9
~.'
.,
l'
disposal of waste material and scrap and chauffeuring could be
considered as outdoor activities. Counsel further submitted that
the grievor's evidence as to the extent of snow removal and yard
maintenance was somewhat uncertain and, perhaps, contradictory.
We were urged to conclude that this work occupied only fifteen
percent (15%) of the grievor's time at most.
It was the further position of the Employer, that the failure
of the class standards to refer to certain equipment used by the
grievor 1S irrelevant. Counsel argued that class standards do
not purport to list tools and equipment as they would need to be
constantly revised with each advance in technology. Lastly,
counsel asserted that steam cleaning amounted to " upkeep and
cleanliness of Government owned motor vehicles " under the class
standards before us.
The Employer relied on the following awards in support of
its position: Booth I .192/90 ( Low) ; Ai rd et a 1 . I 1349/87 (Slone) ;
and Roy, 946/89 ,( Knopf ),.
In Booth, the Board described the test to be applied in cases of
. this nature. It stated:
"The jurisprudence as to the test which must be
met before the awarding of a Berry order 1S
appropriate is that there must be a substantial
variation in either the nature or scope of the
duties performed by the grìevor from that set out
ln the class standard, and no other class standard
reasonably describes the functìonswhich are
carried out by thegrievor. " (page 9)
10
~
(
In Aird et al. the Board made the following comments as to
the onus facing a grievor in this type of dispute:
"For a classification grievance to succeed, the
grievor must show that his job does not fairly fit
within the relevant class standard. The class
standard must necessarily contain some general
language, but it must not be phrased in such
generalities as to make the description
meaningless. Like the strings of a musical
instrument the standard must be neither too tight
nor too loose." (page 4)
- and -
"The onus is on the grievor to show that he 1S
actually performing a job, the essence or core
duties of which do not fit,within the class
standard to which it has been assigned by the
employer." (page 9)
In Roy, the grievor who held the position of warehouseman
claimed that he was wrongfully classified as a Clerk 3, Supply.
The Union sought a Berry order on the basis of a number of extra
,duties performed by the grievor. One of these duties was snow
removal through the use of a snow blower. The class standards in
that instance read in part:
"These classes cover the positions of employees
,who perform a variety of clerical, manual,
administrative, repair or purchasing functions
that are common to stockkeeping operations in the
Provincial Government Service."
In dismissing the grievance, the Board reached the following
conclusions:
"The fact that he performs work in buildings and
on materials outside of the warehouse building
itself are not of significance in the facts at
hand. The definition of the size of an operation
in a preamble to the Class Standards and the
1 1
I
".
,
\-
preamble itself does riot talk only of working 1n a
warehouse. The 1 anguage refers to performing
duties -of a 'stockkeeping operation'...........
. . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . Thus, given the definition of
stockkeeping operation within the Class Standards,
it cannot be said that there is any significance
to be attached in this case to the fact that the
Grievor works outside the main warehouse.....
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ; Fu rthe r, the snow remova 1 ,
work with contractors and general j an i to ria 1 type
. of duties can also be said to fall within the
manual portion of the Clerk Supply series
preamble."
(pages 10 to 1 1 )
It was submitted by the Employer that this logic was equally
applicable to the outdoor work performed by the present grievor.
It is apparent that the Class Standards to a large extent
contemplate servicing and mechanical type work. The Class
Definition states that the "unskilled manual work" is to be
performed by servicemen or mechanical helpers. This work 1S
generally described as "a variety of assigned tas~s with respect
to the upkeep and cleanliness of Government-owned motor
vehicles." The reference to tool-room attendant 1S inapplicable
here. Most, if not all, of the tasks 1 i sted 1n the first two ( 2 )
paragraphs under 'Characteristic Duties' involve the service or
.
repair to" vehicles or the provision of assistance to mechanics.
The mechani'cal-automotive element of the job is further reflected
by the qualifications required. Amongst other attributes, the
Garage Attendant must possess the following: ( i ) a working
know1edge of automotive equipment and motor vehicles; ( i i ) at
least two (2} years experience as a service station attendant, or
12
I
t
I
!
I
,
some comparable employment; and (iii) a mechanical aptitude ard
fami1iarity with the use of service station equipment. In this
respect the job of the Garage Attendant would seem to be very
much like that performed by a helper at a large service staticn.
In the case of the grievor, hóweverJ th'3 work 1S performed on
Government owned vehicles and equipment. On a consideration of
a11 of the evidence, the Board is satisfied that this part of the
grievor's work falls squarely within the language of the class
standards. We reach the same conclusion with respect to what
might be described as Ii nterna 1 maintenance' .
In our judgment, this case presents two ( 2 ) separate, albeit
interrelated, issues. Firstly, do the class standards
contemplate the performance of tasks outside of the actual garage
building? Secondly, if this initial qUElst ion is answered in the
affirmative, are the specific outdoor activities described by the
grievor encompassed by the language of the standards?
We note, with respect to the first issue, that the unsk i 1 '1 ed
manual work is to be performed by employees "in a large
Government garage. " The third paragraph under 'Characteristic
Dut.ies' further states that the Garage Attendant performs
"assigned maintenance tasks on the premises. .. Certain specific
examples of this type of maintenance work are then provided which
involve painting, cleaning, sweeping and waste disposal. It i C·
d
clear from the language of the paragraph that these items are not
1 3
I'
"
...
,
intended to be an inclusive list of activities. We agree that
I
the majority of the duties set ~ut in the class standards are to I
¡
I
be performed by the Garage Attendant inside the garage building. I
The Board is satisfied; however, that some external work is also
contemplated by the class sta~dards. We refe r in this regard to I
waste disposal; chauffeuring and driving; and acting as a night
watchman. All of these duties could clearly involve an aspect of
outdoor work. S i mil a r 1 y" the removal of equ i pment .from outdoor
storage for purposes of servicing or
t
..
,
and character as the other work expressly enumerated in the class
standards. The additionaì work described by the grievor lS, in
our judgment, ,. unsk i ", ed manua 1 work" of the type contemplated by
the class standards. Further, it is performed as part of, and
necessarily incidental to, thé operation of "a large Government
garage .. We also conclude that the typical duties set out in the
.
standards are not the sole determinants of the propriety of t\')e
classification. Regard must also be had t9 the level of
responsibility; complexity of the job; and qualifications
required. In the context of the facts before us, there is
insufficient evidence to establish that the outdoor work requlres
a higher level of responsibility, expertise or qualifications.
The Board concludes, as a result, that such work falls within the
parameters of the class standards. Given this conclusion1 we
find the awards in Beach and Cardno to be distinguishable. We
prefer, instead, to follow the approach adopted in Booth and
Aìrd. Lastly, we note that our decision in respect of the snow
removal is consistent with the result in Roy. In view of our
conclusion, it is unnecessary to conclusively determine the
extent of. the outdoor work performed by this grievor. We have
earlier stated that snow removal, lawn mowing, yard ma i ntenanC'9
and storage likely accounted for twenty-five percent (25%) of the
time spent on the job. This level of activity would have
supported a Berrv order had we found the work to be inconsistent
with the class standards.
15
,.
"
The Board accepts the Employer's submission that the class
standards need not refer to specific tools used to perform the
characteristic duties. We were referred to numerous tools, and
other pieces of equipment, used by the grievor. Generally, we
think that such use can be implied from the types of duties
contained within the class standards. In this regard, the Board
finds that the grievor's use of the steam generator arises f~om
the provision of assistance to mechanics vi~ a vis repairs and
overhauls.
For a 11 of the above reasons, the Board concludes that the
grievor iß properly classified as a Garage Attendant. We
,therefore decline to issue the Berry order as claimed by the
Union. The grievance is denied.
Dated at Toronto ,Ontario this 18th day of December , 1991 .
J ' . rxt/¡
írf], J¡CJ..i< V, LL.. JA
M.V. Watters, Vice-Chairperson
~~~-
/' J. Carruthers, Member
i~ ?l1.~ o!7~
M. O'Toole, Member
16
-----
. 11
.
C h l ~'-- I {tJ .
I .~ BJ,U' e_ _,_- God
I CATEGOI.Y: Maintenance services
GROUP t MS-Q38 Veh1cle Opu'ae1ol'
SE1U1S : Garaqe Attendant
CLASS COC~: 11600
GARAGE ATTt.:liÐA~
cu.ss nEFtmttoN: .
,
This 1, ~s~:Uleci, ~ual ~rk perforllled by ~cemeri or _1D~chan,ical
belp!n@. l~g., GovetmD~t ¡ara,e. Under generùSùpe~i.sion_ theste
employees pel"fol'll . ftJ'i.e'ty of assigDecl tasks vi th resptlct to the upkeep
~~, ele.uù.iness of Goven=en~-çw.ed. IlDtor vehicles, and may also ac't aa
tool.~~:t~~c. Outies all the day shift II&Y include usistt.nce to
liceneed mechaniC3 on repairs and overhaulJ, and to ~&li(;e~ we14ers
eng'¡'-ged in lfehic:le repairs and neel tabril:ation work.' On the ni~ht
shift duties may include thOle of a vat~~ and those of a chauffeur
as well as those of ~\l.1::i.ne servicing_.QÍ-Y.tthicles. The work h subject
to continuous supervision and check.
CHARACTERISTIC WTn:S:
I
Se~ce ears and trucks; check gasoline, oil, batteries, antifree:e; I
chance tires and reþ&ir tubes; lubriuu, vaü and polish vehicllS; . I
, I
.sdlt vi th the servicing and repairin¡ of batteries. I
I
Assist mechanics or welders in repairs, ovel~aul or steel fabricating I
jobS as· assi¡ned: keep count of repaizo materials used; strip ca.rs ~í I
eQuipllen~ ta þe removed 01" exchangêd.
Perform Assi,ned maintenance task3 ~n the premises including painting
~ara~e walls and windows, cleaning gara!~ fl~Qrs ~d ~intin~ :one lines:
swe~p I&~a~e Qf!ices~ s~OCkroOM, lunch room and vashroo.: dispose Qf
waste materials and scrap as auigned.
As tool-room attendant, issue and account fot' specialised ,ara~e equipment
and tools; issue garage expense items and cleaning materials: ~ke main-
,=--e!\ance repail's,u to specialized t.aob and arrange for replacements u
di.r~eted.
~
Occa~ionally assist ift boiler room operations And repair of electrical and
neam-fitt1n.C l!C\uipI'Un't; act as chauffeur Qr' <\rive!" ud perform. Qther
. related work as assi~ned.
QrALLF!CA noss:
1- Elementary school education; satisfactory vørkin~ knavledge of
automotive equipmen~ and motor vehicles: PQssession ~f a Chauffeur's
licence.
2. At leas~ twO years' acceptable eXþerience ~s & service stati~o
_. aJl~ndant. or some comparable employment.
3. ~echanic~l aptitude and familiarier with the use of ~ervice
station equipment: good physical condition.
Revised
Jul"- 19('4 .
\
1 ,),......-: '~. ~ ¡ J...,;.:-....,:;¡. r 1"<r.l1 i l-~ i '... .. ,,'f'; ro::. ¡;;, \"J rri cn~ . ¡ v .;.t ~ I·\H~ L to.
,- -I""'l\.':" . ,_"__
J :'>
,
, f} S:c.1- do,,\le' B' PoeIdon ~ a ex... AlhxAth;n ctc "10
'~ (R* to bKk of farm far ClClo'41~) tnetrucaona)
-
, 'OUIriO [ I o.Þ lWI1eMd t '''''''_i.1 ~ I New WII' "..- i
,. CIC
I -..,
I PalittClll title -, 11'cMttlott COdt r kIØlMr 11M -
'GARAGE ATTENDANT' , 06-5917-16 _ 1
d1. Hn. WCII'Il ¡",P.T. P_,G11lyl lc¡..lIlIl' ---- -,,- .-.....-. CðdIûI l"~ IllIdt ,
40 . 00 4 7 - 0 -- 0 - 0 ,... 0 I I _filA.
l'Oti"" 1l,1e · I P"'¡tíClll CcIoR - 'e.. tltIt MId c-.
~: Garage Attendant 06·5917·16 Garage Attendant, f7600
~~1Ia'Y 0Mil0n
TranspartatLon Northwestern Region
~ -' S-iClll ,'--Ian 160 McDougall Street ¡c;.oe,1.oa. coo.
District lð - Sault Ste. ..rle S'~lt $te. ..r1.. Ontaí~' .Hi· 1''''
'0. of P_ ' jPt_ __ ~ '01 IIMrMIIIiI. Su--'_ Ii llOt'- _lion coGI
1\10. d....u- No.. crI ~
1 Nil Nil Shop ForemanlWoman' 06-5917-02
..-
.. I'u,... of .-.hIan C"",,,,'-'lIIlw -"*' am?)
To service Ministry equipment, to assist mechanics 1n the repairs of District equipment,
to perform duties of maintenance and cleaning of the District Garage and Yard Complex.
t. ow. n:I ,.1nId ... 1",,* 11"",*,-,.,.,"-110.. _ eftcI.....,?,~..... of tllIIe "*" on -" dvtyl
Under tne supervision of the Shop Foreman/Woman" the incumbent will:
1- Service Minist~y equipment by:
- cleaning by using high pressure, steam equipment, washing and/or polishing equipment;
';0' - Checking fluid levels in radiators, transmissions, etc., filling if necessary;
- lubricating engines, chassis, etc.. including filter changes;
· changing tIres ~nd tubes, repairing If necessary. I
Z. Maintain general cleanliness of District Garage and Yard Complex by: I
¡
· sweeping and washing garage floors, removing §rease and oil slicks ~s required~ I
- cleaning walls and windows using ladders/stan s, if necessary; I
30\ _ sweeping approaches and entrance-ways in summer months, grass cutting and general I
I
yard duties as required. , j
_- _...-~~st t~&io P'lrYhor fQr ~'Utionl¡' ~lesAi~9 SUppUOl N-~e~ylre4t--. -
- disposing of wute materials and scrip.
· cleaning tools such as jacks; hoists, stands, etc.; ,
- during winter months, shovellIng snow and sands walkways as required, 'snow removal
iR yard by mechaníéaJ means.
3. Assist mechanic by performing tasks such as:
- cleaning ,paTts and equipment by washing;
,35\ · obtaining repair parts from stockroom: '
- assists lifting transmissions I wheels, springs, installing or r6lllOvi ng snowplOW
I equipment, Installing sander bodies, water tanks"dump boxes, weed spray equipment,
I hydro seeders, etc.;
. I
- IlIQving e< ulpment In yard;
L ~ picking up and delivering of equipment for privatization. _ cont'd....2
¡ 4. 1kil1J ... Mclwltd.. ,....,... to PtrfGnn ~ It fl.tQ -'d:;t.....' n........ nwå~ ~ Of I~ If _ioMØl
\ Working ~nowledge of automot ve'equipmen and motor vehicles. Some reiated experience In
¡ cleaning methods tnd procedures. Must passess a valid Ontario Class "6" oriver's Licence with
I the ability to obtain a Class 110" licenee and an H. T.O. Operator'S Permit. AbiUty to under-
I', stand ....l:;::;. and oral ¡ nstruetl ons ._Good PhY:~~~;¡;:~· :!if 0"" .anuel ..rk,;,.
T~":2J=* I/f I idjft;..... _~. 1'/5"1 ¡-;' I~
J. Ainsworth, Shop Foreman 'R. van Veen, District Engineer
l. ø..t1Daltion a. tIå 'ì oodt ~.... ftUnlllI r I IffectM d.Þ
~ Mon1l) v_
Garage Attendant 17600 MS-038 15 I 10 I 90
I !IeW e_¡ftte lIIlli ~,Ioq ItI ~ toHl "" Cfwll s-Ice ConIIII" C11111fl1:1ttan ItIlIGIrdI far llII fllllowl,. '-.on:
A, Ina1.llllb&nt pe.l"t'onn,ø II varie.~Y of ðut1e.. w:l..thr~l p6ct to the Ì1þ-keeP', and ele.anl:l.ne.aB
of governmmtt cwne4 vehicll!s, equipment ud garaqe !aeil1.t1a..'
a, Rnpons1Dle fel: assistinq 'iaraqe ~bani.e. in p1ckinq up pu2 delivery of e.qu1pme.nt
and/or componenta, lIIOving equipment 'With1n t..'us qaraqe COIIIPle.z, cl_n1nq parts, e.ta.
e. Pert'o~ anc~ll.ry ðut1ee aucn .a enow remgval.
~- ~- ,.~-~
'NO·HI7 ~ ~ ¡,.o;. N 19(7 I P.R. COOk.
PNC*1crp
L't, I.J ..;,¡ ;. ¡'It-""-; l t:. ~H~~
- .
-
. ..,
- .. .
Ntructkma b ttlt'~,",-i farm cec.e1!SO I
,
IJw ltIII_......... llellwtar... lllIIIIIqålll ll ~-.d 1Ir......... OwrClA, ,\........, ~_., _4eow.lUllcIn,.,.,. f1( 0fIIcIt
",.,\:,\"'\ .G,..,.
"'""r"'" Fun ..... ~ ~ llamIlO _ 0 lII'" lit ......., __ ..... ~ Cadt boa: .' !lIclloIll.
UMlutftIed ...... Po........ (Group * ~ B1lCt1llfl11 .. t___!W FvnctlanII CiD4I' boIc In IlecØIIft 1.111C1 till.....
Iorllliorllle In -.on ..
AD odMr p;:;"~ ~ _ _ '- III All". _ OIIt ... fw \.WIll ,_....... PoMIonI. ......
InatNctIonI for ClOdIng........ ...., ~ Jg, cocInØ 8...ol1lll we.¡ ......
CI* . 0Idt r , t. J .
, c-..... , --
~,..... , ..... -- .... -.... ..
".,.,. f ... .. 0.. -, ... ..
...,.. 2 - .... ". All. okIl, O;t;
u.- 'W ,.... ... ,. ..... .... Miw.
".. s . -
... .......... pIrIølf. DCMt~'"
... fir .. buI ... .. 41l101l1111 · 1uIlI_ .1alIaØ
II) .......................... ... -.,1#0. ~ ,.....
~ fIr~ _.. S. fa__ .. ..
t....... ~ (__0 ___°1 - 1
CINup a · It.___-- .... II ,I'll! [J' t J I
CJIwp 1 · ~ 11ft .... _
w. c.o- ., I
- ...... -. ..... a.w-.'" __
InIIl'UCIOnI tal c:acrinO ... NrL WoIfI f. nIeIII ......
- - It. __ CIIIlII III ....
. 0aIIIIpNeI"" far "'.T, .......,. .... lit ... Inl IIcII. r-œ -~l ~ 1
...... ___ III..... a.......... I. ,.. ..." .... - .....0 ~ (J ,1·ld
~ "...... III...............~ 0Rr" .......... ~
....... --..,. A.P,T. ==;'C to. lIDIIIlOft -..
'"'* ClIIII'dIII'" .. ....... Of ...... IDr
lIIII CIIIIIOII.1t#ff ___ . .. ........ .... or WOrk .. NO'ÆJ.................. A. yfllllW to CIlIIfr." IOIilIDII, I
ftIQlIIre .. , ,,. 'AL.II IrId ~ III . _
lllIIIIIDa. -
-2-
.-----.- . ,,- .--.- _.-...;- .. ~._. .
3. Duties and related tasks (cont'd.): I
4. ASSiR Equl¡øntControl Clerk by: '
- '11 1ng of Qat'age WOrk Order's; . I
- dOCUllltntlng lIIOVement of equipment wi thin the District;
S. . preparing equIpment cost reports. employee tilN sheets. daily register,,;
. . as ISslgneci.
, ,
(The operation of ;~lSrl0u$ pleces of equipment as necessary to perform the)
above noted duties. '
. I
. .
I
I
I
.....,. "'.'1i~"'" "."'IÑ~.;.'." I'. i