HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-1545.Hill.92-05-28 ONTARIO
CROWN EMPLOYEES DE L'ONTARIO , .
GRIEVANCE C,OMMISSION DE
SETTLEMENT REGLEMENT
BOARD DES GRIEFS
T$O DUNDAS STREET WE,~T, SUITE 2100, TORONTO, ONTARIO. MSG ~Z$ TELE~HONE/T~£EPHONE:
180, RUE DUNDAS OUEST, ~UREAU 2~ TORONTO (ONTAR~O)~ MSG ~Z8 FACS~/LE/TELECO~IE : (4 ~6~ 326-~396
[545/90
ZN ~ ~TTER OF ~ ~ZT~TZON
Under
~ CRO~ ~P~ES COL~I~ B~GAZNING
Before
~ GRI~CE 8ETT~~ BO~
BE~EN
OPS~ (Hill)
Grievor
The Cro~ in Right of Ontario
(M[n~st~ of Co--unity ~ Social Semites)
~plo~er
BEFOg: G. Simmons Vice-Chai~erson
M. Vorster Me. er
I.. Cowan Me. er
FOR THE R. Wells
GRIEVOR Counsel
Gowling, Strathy & Henderson
Barristers & Solicitors
FOR THE S. White
EMPLOYER Counsel
Legal Services Branch
Ministry of Community & Social Services
HEARING April 30, 1992
2
The BOard released its award in the above matter on November 25, 1991.
Subsequently it was informed that the parties were having difficulty in
implementing the award and sought a reconvening of the Board. By letter dated
February 18, 1992, the Board informed the parties that it would be willing to
reconvene at an early date and requested the RegislTar to schedule a hearing.
A heating was scheduled for April 30, 1992 at which time the Board heard
representations from the parties concerning the difficulties they were
encountering in impJementing this award. At the conclusion of their
representations the Board, after caucuslng, delivered certain oral comments
which were intended to assist the parties in clatifying wt~at the BOard decided in
its decislon dated November 25, 1991.
The Board directed the parties to page 20 of its November 25, 1991 decision
and in particular to the following comments:
We therefore find that the EmplOyer had cause to
discipline the grievor. We do not agree, based on all of
the evidence, that the gdevor's actions render him
incapable of carrying out the duties of a Residential
Counsellor.
As stated above, the Board intended to assist the parties in clarifying its
decision and we therefore paraphrased the second sentence that is in the above
quote. The paraphrase reads: "Based on all of the evidence, we have found
that the grievor's actions render him capable of cam/ing out the duties of a
3
Residential Counsello¢'. We further'informed the parties that the normal rules of
reinstatement taking into account the three month suspension are to apply.
The Board frusts that the foregoing sufficiently clarifies the decision of
November 25, 1991 in order that the parties may now proceed to implement the
decision.
Dated at Kingston, Ontado, this ~Sth day of Mav, 1992.
C. Gordon Simmons
Vice Chairperson
M. Vorster
Member
~. Co~n
Member