Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992-3216.Young.94-10-04 ~ ,r'-' ( ~.~- ( ONTARIO EMPLOYES DE LA COURONNE CROWN EMPLOYEES DE L'ONTARIO 1111 GRIEVANCE COMMISSION DE , SETTLEMENT REGLEMENT BOARD DES GRIEFS 180 DUNDAS STREET WEST SUITE 2100 TORONTO, ONTARIO, M5G IZ8 TELEPHONEITELEPHONE (416) 326-1388. 180, RUE DUNDAS OUEST BUREAU 2100 TORONTO (ONTARIO) M5G IZ8 FACSIMILE ITELECOPfE (416) 326-1396 3216/92 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION Under THE CROWN EMPLOYEES COLLECTIVE BARGAINING ACT Before THE GRIEVANCE SETTLEMENT BOARD BETWEEN OPSEU (Young) Grievor - and - The Crown in Right of ontario (Ministry of Health) Employer . BEFORE: W. Kaplan Vice-Chairperson E. Seymour Member M O'Toole Member FOR THE D. Wright UNION Counsel Ryder Whitaker Wright Barristers & Solicitors FOR THE M. Quick EMPLOYER Counsel .; Legal Services Branch Ministry of Health HEARING August 12, 1993 February 14, 17, 25, 1994 Apri,l 11, 12, 13, 1994 . ~ I ~ ~. / - / 'i" i ( \ 2 Introduction By letter dated September 9, 1994, Ms Mary Quick, counsel for the employer, requestec;:J that the Board issue an order consolidating two ~ grievances, one dated July 20, 1994 and one dated August 24, 1994, with this case which has already proceeded to a number of days of hearing. The grievor is the same in all of these grievances, and the employer took the position that the new grievances related directly to the grievances already " before the Board and that for reasons of economy and efficiency all of these grievances shquld be heard at the same time By letter dated September 13, 1994, Mr David Wright, counsel for the union, objected to the employer's consolidation request and took the position that the new grievances should not be consolidated with the instant case A number of reasons were advanced in support of this submission " It was the parties wish that this consolidation request be considered as - expeditiously as possible in order to avoid attendance at previously scheduled pre-hearings if the Board" decided to grant the employer's request. \., By conference call on September 14, 1 994, counsel were advised that the Board had decided to grant the employer's request. It was agreed, at that time, to adjourn the hearing scheduled to proceed on September 20, 1994 It was further decided that the union would, on the next scheduled date, call its evidence with re?pect to the two new grievances. . .p ~ ( I \ 3 \ DATED at Toronto this 4th day of October, 1994 I~I -- Iv '- ----------------- William Kaplan Vice-Chairperson 4/a - v~.....:--- ----------------- E. Seymour Member m_~_~l:1~ M O'Toole Member .