HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-1936.Slusarchuk.03-02-04 Decision
Crown Employees Commission de ~~
Grievance Settlement reglement des griefs
Board des employes de la
Couronne
~-,...
Suite 600 Bureau 600 Ontario
180 Dundas Sl. West 180 rue Dundas Ouest
Toronto Ontario M5G 1Z8 Toronto (Ontario) M5G 1Z8
Tel. (416) 326-1388 Tel. (416) 326-1388
Fax (416) 326-1396 Telec. (416) 326-1396
GSB# 1936/95 0756/96 0762/96 2145/96 2146/96 2147/96 2148/96 2149/96 2150/96
UNION# 95G287 95G288 95G289 95G290 95G291 96D704 96D703 96H206
96H205 96H204 96H203 96H202, 96H199 96H200
IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION
Under
THE CROWN EMPLOYEES COLLECTIVE BARGAINING ACT
Before
THE GRIEVANCE SETTLEMENT BOARD
BETWEEN
Ontano PublIc ServIce Employees Umon
(Sl usarchuk) Grievor
- and -
The Crown In RIght of Ontano
(Mimstry of Commumty and SocIal ServIces) Employer
BEFORE Owen V Gray Vice-Chair
FOR THE UNION Kathleen Lawrence
Gnevance Officer
Ontano PublIc ServIce Employees Umon
FOR THE EMPLOYER LIsa Nowak
CoordInator Employee RelatIOns
Mimstry of Commumty FamIly and
ChIldren's ServIces
HEARING January 30 2003
2
DECISION
[1] By Order dated December 18, 2002, thIS Board (dIfferently constItuted) ordered as
follows
1 The gnevor wIll be provIded one final opportumty to appear before the Gnevance
Settlement Board m regard to these matters on January '30 200:3 Her faIlure to attend
that hearmg barrmg exceptIOnal CIrcumstances WIll be grounds to chsmIss the matter
2. The gnevor IS advIsed that she IS represented m thIs proceedmg by the Umon not a
pnvate SolIcItor In the CIrcumstances of thIs case the gnevor has no nght to be
represented by pnvate counsel.
'3 WIth the consent of all partIes the hearmg on January '30 2008 WIll proceed before
Vice-ChaIr Owen Gray
[2] The hearmg m these matters was scheduled for hearmg on Thursday, January 30,
2003 at 10,00 a,m, at the Board's premIses RepresentatIves of the employer and the umon
attended at that tIme and place The gnevor dId not attend at 10,00 a,m" nor wIthm 45
mmutes thereafter The umon's representatIve advIsed me that at the gnevor's request the
umon had been commumcatmg wIth her through the offices of her M P P , that notIce of the
Board's order of December 18, 2002 and of the tIme and place of the hearmg provIded for m
that order had been gIven to the gnevor by that means, and that the M P P's office had
confirmed receIpt thereof by the gnevor Thereafter, neIther the employer nor the umon had
heard from the gnevor
[3] As It appeared that there were no exceptIOn cIrcumstances, I dIsmIssed these
gnevances orally, m accordance wIth the order of December 18, 2002 ThIs wntten decIsIOn
confirms that dISposItIOn,
Dated at Toronto thIS 4th day of February, 2003