Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-1702.Ducette and Union Grievance.03-06-05 Decision Crown Employees Commission de ~~ Grievance Settlement reglement des griefs Board des employes de la Couronne ~-,... Suite 600 Bureau 600 Ontario 180 Dundas Sl. West 180 rue Dundas Ouest Toronto Ontario M5G 1Z8 Toronto (Ontario) M5G 1Z8 Tel. (416) 326-1388 Tel. (416) 326-1388 Fax (416) 326-1396 Telec. (416) 326-1396 GSB# 1702/02,2427/02 UNION# 2002-0453-0031 2002-0999-0023 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION Under THE CROWN EMPLOYEES COLLECTIVE BARGAINING ACT Before THE GRIEVANCE SETTLEMENT BOARD BETWEEN Ontano PublIc ServIce Employees Umon (Ducette and Umon Gnevance) Grievor - and - The Crown In RIght of Ontano (Mimstry of TransportatIOn and Management Board Secretanat) Employer BEFORE Richard Brown Vice-Chair FOR THE UNION Richard Blair Ryder Wnght Blair & Doyle BarrIsters and SOlICItorS FOR THE EMPLOYER Sean Kearney Counsel Management Board Secretanat HEARING May 28 2003 2 DeCISIon The umon seeks call-back pay for some of the employees who provIded essentIal or emergency serVIces dunng the eIght-week stnke In early 2002 Ahson Ducette claims call-back pay In her IndIVIdual gnevance, FIle No 1702/02 The pohcy gnevance, FIle No 2427/02, concerns payment not only for beIng called back but also for standby and on-call, standby and on-call are not consIdered here ThIS decIsIOn deals only wIth call- back pay and only for employees In CIrcumstances analogous to those underlYIng the Ducette gnevance Counsel agreed that entItlement to call-back pay In other scenanos would be addressed after they receIved thIS decIsIOn I Ahson Ducette, a transportatIOn enforcement officer, was desIgnated as an essentIal servIces worker Dunng the first four weeks of the strike, she was scheduled to work three ShIftS of 7 25 hours weekly at the Lancaster tnlck InSpectIOn statIOn A schedule posted before the commencement of the stnke IndIcated she was reqUIred to work, dunng the week of March 27, on March 27, 28 and 31 A schedule posted on March 27, 2002 IndIcated she was reqUIred to work, dunng the week of Apnl3, on Apnl4, 5 and 7 On Apnl2, when Ms Ducette was not scheduled to work, a manager phoned her at home, at approxImately 6 00 a.m , and asked her to report for duty She worked approxImately 5.25 hours and was paid the basIc hourly rate for that tIme 3 II In antIcIpatIOn of a strike, the partIes executed an agreement, dated September 20, 2001, entItled CondItIons for the 2001-2002 OPS-OPSEU EssentIal ServIces and CollectIve Agreement NegotIatIOns (the condItIons document) The tenns and condItIons of employment for employees provIdIng essentIal and emergency serVIces are governed by artIcle C3a of the condItIons document The relevant portIOns of that artIcle state All collectIve agreement prOVISIOns apply to essentIal and emergency workers wIthout InterruptIOn, save only that AppendIx 9 and AppendIx 18 shall not apply F or employees who are desIgnated and used for essentIal servIces the above terms and condItIons of employment apply F or those employees who are used to perfonn emergency servIces as provIded In the emergency servIces part of the essentIal serVIces agreements and as reqUIred by the Employer the above terms and condItIons of employment apply After detennInIng that an employee IS to be used to perform emergency serVIces work, the above terms and condItIons of employment apply In OPSEU and Managem ent Board Secretarzat, FIle 1510/02, decIsIOn dated December 4, 2002, I consIdered what artIcle C3a of the condItIons document said about the apphcatIOn of the collectIve agreement to essentIal serVIce workers F or an employee who IS desIgnated to provIde essentIal serVIces and does so, when does he or she begIn to receIve the protectIOn of the collectIve agreement and when does that protectIOn cease? The absence of any temporallunItatIOn In the tlurd paragraph of artIcle C3a, together wIth the phrase "wIthout InterruptIOn" In the first, IndIcate that such an employee lS covered by the collectlve agreement from the first day of the work stoppage to the last (page 17, emphasIs added) 4 The apphcable collectIve agreement IS the 1999-2001 contract ArtIcle ADM 9 1 of that agreement deals wIth call-back pay for employees In the admInIstratIve bargaInIng umt An employee who leaves Ius or her place of work and IS subsequently called back to work pnor to the startIng tIme of hIS or her next scheduled ShIft shall be paid a mInunum of four (4) hours' pay at one and one-half (11;;) tunes Ius or her basIc hourly rate The call-back prOVISIOns for employees In other bargaInIng umts are IdentIcal III The apphcatIOn of the law to the facts at hand IS straightforward Ms Ducette was desIgnated to provIde essentIal servIces and dId provIde such servIces dunng the strike AccordIngly, she was covered by the collectIve agreement from the first day of the work stoppage to the last She left her place of work at the end of her scheduled ShIft on March 31, she was called back to work on Apnl 2, before her next scheduled shIft on Apnl4 In these cIrcumstances, she was entItled to call-back pay as specIfied In artIcle ADM 9 1 of the collectIve agreement Dated at Toronto thIS 5th day of June, 2003 ~~~--"""" RIchard Brown VIce-Chair