Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003-0991.Ryckman.03-12-16 Decision Crown Employees Commission de ~~ Grievance Settlement reglement des griefs Board des employes de la Couronne ~-,... Suite 600 Bureau 600 Ontario 180 Dundas Sl. West 180 rue Dundas Ouest Toronto Ontario M5G 1Z8 Toronto (Ontario) M5G 1Z8 Tel. (416) 326-1388 Tel. (416) 326-1388 Fax (416) 326-1396 Telec. (416) 326-1396 GSB# 2003-0991 UNION# 2003-0108-0021 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION Under THE CROWN EMPLOYEES COLLECTIVE BARGAINING ACT Before THE GRIEVANCE SETTLEMENT BOARD BETWEEN Ontano PublIc ServIce Employees Umon (Ryckman) Grievor - and - The Crown In RIght of Ontano (Mimstry of PublIc Safety and Secunty) Employer BEFORE Bram HerlIch Vice-Chair FOR THE UNION Jim Paul and Stephen GIles Gnevance Officers Ontano PublIc ServIce Employees Umon FOR THE EMPLOYER Greg GledhIll Staff RelatIOns Officer Mimstry of PublIc Safety and Secunty HEARING December 12, 2003 2 DECISION ThIS was one of many cases dealt wIth by the partIes on three days of medIatIOn held on December 10-12, 2003 to deal wIth outstandIng gnevances out of ElgIn Middlesex DetentIOn Centre Many of those cases were resolved by way of settlements or wIthdrawals Some wIll have to be advanced to the Board for further medIatIOn and/or arbItratIOn. There were, however a number of cases, lIke the Instant one, whIch the partIes agreed ought to be dIsposed of through the medIatIOn/arbItratIOn procedure contemplated under ArtIcle 22 16 To that end, the partIes agreed that I ought to make a final determInatIOn on the basIs of the InformatIOn provIded to me dunng the course of the medIatIOn process I also gave the partIes a full opportumty to make submIssIOns whIch I consIdered pnor to ISSUIng any rulIng. To further expedIte the process and In VIew of the lack of precedentIal value assocIated wIth thIS decIsIOn under the terms of ArtIcle 22 16 7 the partIes asked that I not Include any reasons In thIS decIsIOn. ThIS gnevance related to a claim of an Improper overtIme assIgnment. HavIng consIdered the InformatIOn and submIssIOns placed before I hereby dIrect as follows The gnevance IS allowed. The partIes IndIcated that there would be no dIspute between them as to the appropnate remedy In the event the gnevance was allowed. I thus remIt the matter to them and remaIn seIzed should they encounter any dIfficulty In ImplementIng the terms of thIS award. Dated at Toronto thIS 16th day of December 2003 ~~.rj 'M'i>iL~~~~l: - . ,.. . , " Bram HerlIch, Vice-Chairperson