Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-1743.Punja.07-08-29 Decision Crown Employees Grievance Settlement Board Suite 600 180 Dundas Sl. West Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z8 Tel. (416) 326-1388 Fax (416) 326-1396 Commission de reglement des griefs des employes de la Couronne Nj ~ Ontario Bureau 600 180, rue Dundas Ouest Toronto (Ontario) M5G 1Z8 Tel. : (416) 326-1388 Telec. : (416) 326-1396 GSB# 2000-1743 UNION# 2000-0582-0042, 2000-0582-0043 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION Under THE CROWN EMPLOYEES COLLECTIVE BARGAINING ACT BETWEEN BEFORE FOR THE UNION FOR THE EMPLOYER HEARING Before THE GRIEVANCE SETTLEMENT BOARD Ontario Public Service Employees Union (Punja) - and - The Crown in Right of Ontario (Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services) Brian Keller Scott Andrews Grievance Officer Ontario Public Service Employees Union Pauline Jones Staff Relations Officer Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services August 28, 2007. Union Employer Vice-Chair 2 Decision The parties referred these grievances to mediation/arbitration in accordance with Article 22.16 of the Collective Agreement. The grievances were originally filed in 2000 and involve the issue of shift premiums while employed at the Toronto East Detention Centre. The parties came to a negotiated settlement on August 10th, 2006. The parties are in agreement that there were administrative delays regarding the payout of the settlement spanning several months. The grievor requests that the employer be directed to review all records to determine the exact quantum owed. In addition, the grievor is seeking interest back to the date of the first infraction. At the outset of the hearing, the parties agreed that I exercise my jurisdiction to decide this matter, and requested that I issue a decision, with abbreviated reasons. Having carefully reviewed the evidence presented and the submissions of the parties, I find as follows: The parties are to be commended for resolving the disputes at mediation. It is unfortunate that there were delays regarding the administration of this settlement. It would be inappropriate, however, to undermine the settlement but it is appropriate to compensate the grievor for the inconvenience of not being paid in a timely fashion following the settlement. In determining the appropriate amount of compensation, I also note the unwillingness of the grievor to attend at his former place of work to collect the cheque in January. Consequently, after considering the above, I order that the employer is to compensate the grievor in the sum of $580.00 net, without deductions. The employer is directed to pay the amount within 14 calendar days. Toronto, Ontario, this 29th day of August 2007. M. Brian Keller, Vice-Chair