Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007-3123.Butsch.08-01-30 Decision Commission de Crown Employees Grievance Settlement règlement des griefs Board des employés de la Couronne Suite 600 Bureau 600 180 Dundas St. West 180, rue Dundas Ouest Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z8 Toronto (Ontario) M5G 1Z8 Tel. (416) 326-1388 Tél. : (416) 326-1388 Fax (416) 326-1396 Téléc. : (416) 326-1396 GSB# 2007-3123 UNION# 2006-0368-0215 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION Under THE CROWN EMPLOYEES COLLECTIVE BARGAINING ACT Before THE GRIEVANCE SETTLEMENT BOARD BETWEEN Ontario Public Service Employees Union (Butsch) Union - and - The Crown in Right of Ontario (Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services) Employer BEFOREVice-Chair Felicity D. Briggs FOR THE UNION Stephen Giles Grievance Officer Ontario Public Service Employees Union FOR THE EMPLOYER Gary Wylie Staff Relations Officer Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services HEARING January 24, 2008. 2 Decision The Employer and the Union at the Central East Correctional Centre agreed to participate in the Expedited Mediation-Arbitration process in accordance with the negotiated Protocol. Most of the grievances were settled through that process. However, a few remained unresolved and therefore require a decision from this Board. The Protocol provides that decisions will be issued within a relatively short period of time after the actual mediation sessions and will be without reasons. Further, the decision is to be without prejudice and precedent. Mr. Butsch filed a grievance in 2006 that alleged his merit increase was improperly calculated and asked for a readjustment with monies owed retroactive to 2003. The Employer conceded that the grievance should be upheld but urged this Board that compensation should be awarded back only to twenty working days prior to the filing of the grievance. The Union submitted that the violation can only be fully redressed by an award of full compensation back to 2003. Having considered the submissions of the parties regarding jurisdiction and the Board?s jurisprudence regarding remedies, I must agree with the Employer. Accordingly, the grievance is upheld to the extent set out above. th Dated in Toronto this 30 day of January, 2008. Felicity D. Briggs Vice-Chair