Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2017-1792.Manna et al.19-01-24 DecisionCrown Employees Grievance Settlement Board Suite 600 180 Dundas St. West Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z8 Tel. (416) 326-1388 Fax (416) 326-1396 Commission de règlement des griefs des employés de la Couronne Bureau 600 180, rue Dundas Ouest Toronto (Ontario) M5G 1Z8 Tél. : (416) 326-1388 Téléc. : (416) 326-1396 GSB# 2017-1792 UNION# 2017-5112-0229 IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION Under THE CROWN EMPLOYEES COLLECTIVE BARGAINING ACT Before THE GRIEVANCE SETTLEMENT BOARD BETWEEN Ontario Public Service Employees Union (Manna et al) Union - and - The Crown in Right of Ontario (Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services) Employer BEFORE Dale Hewat Arbitrator FOR THE UNION Tim Hannigan Ryder Wright Blair & Holmes LLP Counsel FOR THE EMPLOYER Thomas Ayers Treasury Board Secretariat Legal Services Branch Counsel HEARING January 22, 2019 -2- DECISION [1] This Grievance came before me under s.22.16 of the Collective Agreement. The parties originally attended a mediation at the Grievance Settlement Board in July 2018 and decided to schedule a further day of mediation. On January 22, 2019 a second mediation was held during which it was decided that I would provide a Decision setting out an order for particulars. In addition, the parties agreed to attend a hearing on July 26, 2019 to deal with the preliminary issues identified below. [2] The Grievance dated August 25, 2017 (“the 2017 Grievance”) alleged that the Employer violated the Collective Agreement as well as other legislation including the Employment Standards Act, the College of Nurses of Ontario Professional Standards, R.2002, Registered Health Practitioners Act 1991 and the Nursing Act 1991, by requiring Registered Nurses at the Toronto South Detention Centre (TSDC) and the Toronto Intermittent Centre (TIC) to be available to respond to emergencies at all times including during their unpaid breaks. The grievors allege that this requirement resulted in the grievors not being compensated for time worked during an unpaid break and often resulted in their 12-hour shift being extended by 30 minutes. [3] During the mediation on January 22, 2019, the parties advised that they had reached a settlement of the 2017 Grievance, with the exception of the Union’s claim for retroactive compensation. A Memorandum of Settlement (the Settlement”) was signed on July 26, 2018 which provided that the Employer would change its scheduling practice with the result that the parties reached a Memorandum of Agreement, dated September 11, 2018 establishing a Compressed Work Week Arrangement. [4] In addition to the Union’s claim for retroactive compensation, it was brought to my attention that there is another outstanding Grievance (“the 2014 Grievance”) dealing with the same issue, dated June 12, 2014. The Union seeks to have that Grievance consolidated with the 2017 Grievance for the purpose of seeking retroactive compensation. [5] Before this case can be heard on the issue of retroactive compensatory damages, the Union is required to provide the following particulars regarding the 2017 Grievance to the Employer no later than May 17, 2019: a) A list of all shifts between July 25, 2017 or 30 days before the filing of the 2017 Grievance and July 26, 2018 (the Settlement date) listed by date where grievors were required to work during their unpaid breaks and were not compensated. b) Evidence of the grievors bringing the issue of working during an unpaid break during the time period listed in (a) to management’s attention. -3- c) Evidence during the time period listed in (a) of denials of compensation by management where the grievors were required to work during an unpaid break. [6] A hearing is scheduled on July 26, 2019 in order to deal with the following preliminary issues: a) To determine the scope of the grievors’ claim for retroactive compensation having regard to the particulars provided pursuant to paragraph 5. b) To determine whether the 2014 Grievance should be consolidated with the 2017 Grievance and the time-frame and scope for assessing retroactive compensation in the event that the two Grievances are consolidated. Dated at Toronto, Ontario this 24th day of January, 2019. “Dale Hewat” ______________________ Dale Hewat, Arbitrator