HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-2165.Hanske.08-11-14 Decision
Commission de
Crown Employees
Grievance Settlement
règlement des griefs
Board
des employés de la
Couronne
Suite 600 Bureau 600
180 Dundas St. West 180, rue Dundas Ouest
Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z8 Toronto (Ontario) M5G 1Z8
Tel. (416) 326-1388 Tél. : (416) 326-1388
Fax (416) 326-1396 Téléc. : (416) 326-1396
GSB#2006-2165, 2006-2166, 2006-2355, 2006-2609, 2006-2625, 2006-2626, 2006-2627, 2007-0619,
2007-2851, 2007-3178, 2007-3513, 2008-1465
UNION#2006-0368-0165, 2006-0368-0166, 2006-0368-0199, 2006-0368-0213, 2007-0368-0014,
2007-0368-0015, 2007-0368-0016, 2007-0368-0052, 2007-0368-0165, 2007-0368-0181,
2006-0368-0216, 2008-0368-0071
IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION
Under
THE CROWN EMPLOYEES COLLECTIVE BARGAINING ACT
Before
THE GRIEVANCE SETTLEMENT BOARD
BETWEEN
Ontario Public Service Employees Union
(Hanske)
Union
- and -
The Crown in Right of Ontario
(Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services)
Employer
Vice-Chair
BEFOREFelicity D. Briggs
FOR THE UNION
Tim Mulhall
Grievance Officer
Ontario Public Service Employees Union
FOR THE EMPLOYERGary Wylie
Staff Relations Officer
Ministry of Community Safety and
Correctional Services
HEARINGOctober 15, 2008.
2
Decision
[1]The Employer and the Union at the Central East Correctional Centre agreed to participate
in the Expedited Mediation-Arbitration process in accordance with the negotiated Protocol.
Many of the grievances were settled through that process. However, a few remained
unresolved and therefore require a decision from this Board. The Protocol provides that
decisions will be issued within a relatively short period of time after the actual mediation
sessions and will be without reasons. Further, in accordance with the Protocol, this
decision is to be without prejudice and precedent.
[2]Mr. Raimund Hanske is a Recreation Officer who has filed a series of grievances alleging
various breaches of the Collective Agreement including but not limited to denial of travel
time and mileage; inaccurate job descriptions; differential treatment of Recreation Officer
from Correctional Officers; and missed overtime opportunities.
[3]I was given a document outlining the grievor?s facts and views of all of the grievances
before me. It was the Employer?s position that there has been no violation of the Collective
Agreement.
[4]After considering the facts and submissions of the parties I am of the view that there has
been no violation of the Collective Agreement and therefore these grievances must be
dismissed.
th
Dated at Toronto this 14 day of November, 2008.
Felicity D. Briggs, Vice-Chair