HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007-2623.Trombley.10-01-05 Decision
Commission de Commission de
Crown Employeess
Grievance Grievance
règlement des griefs règlement des griefs
Settlement Board Settlement Board
des employés de la des employés de la
Couronne Couronne
Suite 600 Suite 600 Bureau 600 Bureau 600
180 Dundas St. West 180 Dundas St. West 180, rue Dundas Ouest 180, rue Dundas Ouest
Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z8 Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z8 Toronto (Ontario) M5G 1Z8 Toronto (Ontario) M5G 1Z8
Tel. (416) 326-1388 Tel. (416) 326-1388 Tél. : (416) 326-1388 Tél. : (416) 326-1388
Fax (416) 326-1396 Fax (416) 326-1396 Téléc. : (416) 326-1396 Téléc. : (416) 326-1396
GSB#2007-2623 GSB#2007-2623
UNION#UNION#2007-0467-00182007-0467-0018
IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION
UUnnddeerr
THE CROWN EMPLOYEES COLLECTHE CROWN EMPLOYEES COLLECTIVE BARGAINING ACT TIVE BARGAINING ACT
BBeeffoorree
THE GRIEVANCE SETTLEMENT BOARD THE GRIEVANCE SETTLEMENT BOARD
BETWEENBETWEEN
Ontario Public Service Employees Union
èÏÔÎÏ
(Trombley)
- and -
The Crown in Right of Ontario
(Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services)
Employer
BEFOREDeborah J.D. Leighton Vice-Chair
FOR THE UNIONAnastasios Zafiriadis
Grievance Officer
Ontario Public Service Employees Union
Frank Inglis
Grievance Officer
Ontario Public Service Employees Union
FOR THE EMPLOYERGary Wylie
Staff Relations Officer
Ministry of Community Safety and
Correctional Services
Brian Scott
Staff Relations Advisor
Ministry of Community Safety and
Correctional Services
HEARING
December 15, 2009.
- 2 -
DECISION
[1] Ms. Kim Trombley, a nurse in the unclassified service at Quinte Detention
Centre, when she grieved on November 20, 2007, alleged she should have been
assigned shifts when she made herself available for work on several days in a
seven week period. The employer denied that it had violated the collective
agreement.
[2] The parties referred this grievance to mediation/arbitration in accordance with
Article 22.16 of the collective agreement. At the outset of the hearing the parties
agreed that I had the jurisdiction to deal with this matter. They asked that I issue
a decision without precedent or prejudice, and without written reasons in accord
with the policy of the parties for expedited hearings under Article 22.16.
[3] Having carefully considered the submissions of the parties, as well as the
jurisprudence of the Board, I hereby deny this grievance.
th
Dated at Toronto this 5 day of January 2010.
Deborah J.D. Leighton, Vice-Chair