HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985-0497.Anderson et al.87-02-10IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION
- Under -
THE CROWN EWLOYEES COLLECTIVE BARGAINING ACT
- Before -
THE GRIEVANCE SETTLRHENT BOARD
BETWEEN:
OPSEU (Anderson et al)
- and -
The Crown in Right of Ontario
(Ministry of Natural Resources)
BEFORE:
FOR THE GRIEVOR:
R. .I. Roberts
I. Freedman
A. Stapleton
ROSS Wells
Counsel
Cowling & Henderson
Barristers & Solicitors
FOR THE EHPLOYER: D. W. Brown, Q.C.
Counsel
Crown Law Office, Civil
Ministry of the Attorney General
HEARING: February 6, 1987
INTERIN DECISION
At the outset of the hearing in this matter the Board was advised by the
parties that management had recently reclassified the grie9or.s as Resource
Technicians 3 (Atypical). The Union indicated that the grievers did
not consider this to be a proper classification within the meaning OF
our award dated August 26, 1986. It was submitted that the Board retain
jurisdiction to review~this development.
Upon due consideration of the matter, the Board unanimously concluded
that it had jurisdiction. In our previous award, we stated, l*[$he matter
is remitted to the Ministry for purposes of establishing a proper classifi-
cation for the grievers. We will retain jurisdiction pending implementation
of the terms of this Award.” The submission of the Union amounted to
a claim that the award had not been properly implemented and obviously,
we have retained jurisdiction to review such a claim.
DATED at Toronto, Ontario thislOth day of February, 1987.
.+ A-- .I -. “/ 7./--
I
,. ,. R. J. R;$r&, ViceFrman
3 ,I ,,i
,.,’ ‘A
I. Freedman, Member
A. G. Stapleton, Member ’